The Voting System In Australia's Electoral System Of Democracy

1853 Words4 Pages

“Voting is part of democracy to protect the best interests of the people no matter what is their race, gender, political opinion or religion” (United Nation, 2005). The word democracy came from the Greek words “demos” which means people, and “craters” which means provided or rules. (Museum of Australian dictionary, 2012) Therefore, democracy is about rule and people. Democracy is a system of governance which allows every citizen to get an equal chance to speak and join in political society. This essay will begin by examining three different voting systems and how Australia’s electoral system can be improved to make it more democratic. I recommend that our electoral system should be changed to a proportional system because this system does not produce wasted votes as much as other systems. Wasted votes are votes which went for an elected candidate. If the rate of wasted votes is high, public opinion becomes less likely to be reflected in a political system. Therefore if we want to have a more democratic society, we need a system which does not produce many wasted votes. I chose Canada and NZ to compare with Australia because they have similar GDP’s and cultural values. They are also …show more content…

At the first count, the chosen candidate was Mr. Scullin (ALP) who got 42.5 per cent of votes. H would have won if Australia was using an FPTP system, but he did not get more than 50 per cent of first preferences and the procedure occurred as following the rule of a preferential system. In this case, the elimination of candidate was continued until the last. At the last distribution, Mr. Scullin got 43.7 per cent and Mr. Gibson (VFU) who was the second at the beginning, he got 56.3 per cent , and which means that Mr. Gibson won with a majority. The votes for Sculin (ALP) were rejected, however if Australia was using a FPTP system, it would have rejected more

Open Document