Sculptures were one of the most important things in the Egyptian world. They were important because they had a very important function in the tombs as substitute for the mummification. These were made out of wood, clay, and other different materials, but the majority of the statues were made of stone. Some examples that are in the textbook of the sculptures are Khafe, and the seated scribe. Khafe was an enthroned divine ruler with a perfect body. The pose he is making is of complete stillness which showed off the body, this sculpture was made out of the stone called diorite which is a dark stone, it was hard to get as they had brought it 400 miles from the Nile River. The Seated Scribe was characterized as the portrait of the Egyptian god-kings didn’t extend to the portrayal of non-elite individuals. He had signs that he was aging which is a sign that is inappropriate for an Egyptian to age they should stay nice and young looking like Khafre did but the seated scribe was different then him. He seemed to be more relaxed and not worried about what he looked like but how he lived his life. The painting I thought was the most interesting was Goats treading seed and cattle fording a canal because it was showing how they used the Nile River for the passage to the afterlife and how they were combined with stereotypical poses for the human and aminals with unconventional postures and such detail to the
An analysis of Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II and Augustus of Primaporta, reveals that there are many similarities, but also many differences between these two pieces of sculpture. These similarities and differences are found in the subject, style, and function of both works of art.
The difference between an archaic statue such as Kroisos (fig. 5-11) and a classical statue such as Doryphoros (fig. 5-42) may not seem very great in a single glance. In fact, you may not notice any differences in that one glance. Yet, if you were to look at them closely, you can see that these two statues actually have very little in common.
This statue is the most well known sculpture, made during the transition period between the late archaic and classical period. It allows modern viewers to see the transition between the stoic Kouro and Kourai to the more sensual, defined and human-like figurines of the later periods Sculptures like Kritios Boy filled friezes in elite Roman villas and magnificent buildings like the Parenthon. It is seplucated that this statue was made between 400-480 BCE, by the artist Krito a philosopher, teacher and artist. They're many ideas relating to sculptures representation, most historians agree that it may represent the youth and virility of a victor returning from war. Due to the location the statue was found it is safe to assume that Athenians
These two statues are famous to the Egyptian art era. They represent the woman’s position and the man’s position at that day and age. Traditionally, the rulers of Egypt were male. So, when Hatshepsut, Dynasty 18, ca. 1473-1458 B.C., assumed the titles and functions of king she was portrayed in royal male costumes. Such representations were more for a political statement, rather than a reflection of the way she actually looked. In this sculpture, she sits upon a throne and wears the royal kilt and the striped nemes (NEM-iss) headdress with the uraeus (cobra) and is bare chested like a man. However, she does not wear the royal beard, and the proportions of her body are delicate and feminine.
Hemingway, S. 2007. "From Gods to Grotesques: Hellenistic Bronze Sculptures at the Metropolitan Museum." Apollo 166 (May): 50, 52, fig. 2.
sculpture of Dionysos, it tells us about a little bit of culture. The unclothed Dionysos indicate a common
...culpture does not represent somebody or something, we could conclude that the sculptor preferred to do candid works. This may seem somewhat contradictory to the sculpture itself because of its static and centered position, but since this piece comes from the earliest samples of Ancient Egyptian art, we could bend the standards in some way and arrive to this conclusion. Finally, what got my attention to this sculpture was the humanism involved that reminds me that we, as human-beings, have had the same ideas and values since the beginning of our race on Earth. This sculpture represented, represents and will represent the reason humans take time to make art: because we want to capture in a picture all of our essence and passion. For some people the Man and Wife in Traditional Clothes may seem as Ancient-Egypt art, but for me it is a reflection of ourselves in the past.
During the Ancient Egyptian times, sculptures were very important to the culture. Often times, people of the higher class had sculptures made to resemble themselves. Material of the sculpture usually told a lot about the importance of the person it portrayed. The Triad of King Mycerinus and Two Goddesses, for example, is made out of Greywacke. The reason why quality material was usually used on royalty sculptures is because it was believed to last for a long time. Judging by the condition of The Triad of King Mycerinus and Two Goddesses, this appears to be true. Having a strong sculpture symbolized the immortality and strength of the king. After death, the king is believed to live on forever in the afterlife with ...
Viewing the Lansdowne Hermes with a naked eye and what you will see is a larger than life-size statue depicting a man with an ideal body leaning with the majority of his weight on his right foot. His right arm is resting on his right buttock in an almost effortless pose. The left side of his body tells a different story. His left foot has barely any weight on it, and his left arm is supporting a pretty large portion of cloth wrapped so it perfectly wraps around the shoulder and rests just above the wrist. It appears that he was at one time holding some sort of sword or stick. To the naked eye that is what this sculpture seems to be, accepting a sculpture as a piece of art. Glancing at the Lansdowne Hermes you can appreciate beauty of art for beauty of art. However the sculptor had much more in mind when he created this figure from a large unscathed piece of marble.
Many art works such as statues are placed throughout the world in different settings. The most common setting for statues is found in funerary settings. The importance of statues in funerary settings is that they are use to project the power the person had before his death. The seated statue of Khafre enthroned from Gizeh, Egypt, illustrates the idealized pharaoh. Another sculpture is Kouros, from Anavysos, Greece that depicts the heroism of Kroisos dying in battle. The Kouros and Khafre are similar in the way that they both radiate power and serve the purpose of honoring the dead men, yet Khafre has a greater significance because it illustrates the pharaoh in a flawless form and the audience can tell that he was a great ruler by the perfect cut sculpture.
The layout of the museum makes it very easy to find works of art from different time periods. Since I have always been fascinated with ancient Greece and Rome, I knew exactly where to start my search. The Indian Triumph of Dionysus is on display directly at the top of the staircase leading up to the second floor. It is surrounded by many other artifacts from ancient Greece and Rome. As your eyes move across the room, catching a glint of gold here and pearly white marble there, it’s very easy to become overwhelmed for a moment. As I reached the top of the stairs, it was evident that the staging of this magnificent piece was carefully planned. The staff of the museum undoubtedly wants this piece seen by each and every visitor. The exhibit itself is well done. If you stand directly in front of The Indian Triumph of Dionysus, everything around you seems to fade away and tunnel vision sets in. As I stood in front of The Indian Triumph of Dionysus, diligently taking notes since photos are not allowed, I experienced an extreme spiritual connection to the past. I tried to put myself into the shoes of the author. What was his purpose? What d...
It depicts a ruler and a queen in their ideal youthful form. Menkaure is portrayed as a relatively ordinary person (only recognizable by the nemes and the false beard), being gently but firmly embraced by his significant other. Both the king and the queen are roughly the same size, and nothing in the statue demonstrates the king’s inclination to violence or his significant dominance over the queen. They are both shown to be taking a step forward – the queen taking a smaller step, and letting the king lead. Both figures are shown to have slight smiles on their faces, giving the sculpture even a greater sense of peace and
The statue is made of marble, instead of the bronze statue. This statue is one of the earliest marble statues of a human figure carved in Attica. The statue is a kind of symbol; he does not in any way a likeness. This is my first expression when I saw the statue: the statue is showing me a simple, clear action that was used by Greek youth sculptures throughout this period. Looking at this statue, he expanded into 3D space, because he is standing straight and facing forward without any exaggerated movements, thus the post makes him look closed-off and a column his limbs are locked in space. Therefore, the standing posture, the decorations on his body, his hair and knee’s texture and how the Egyptians impact Greek art, is what makes me interested in it. A question that has always been in my mind is
As you enter the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, remember to bring an open mind with you because inside this museum, located on 5th Avenue and 82nd Street, you’ll discover and learn that there is a specific story behind every piece of artwork you see. One could not just walk around the museum uninterested without having the urge to ask, “Who’s this?” about a particular statue standing before them, it’s just impossible! So, this is why it’s great to be curious and understand that there is always a meaning behind everything, especially in Greek and Roman Art. Now, the experience of seeing such beautiful artwork is different when you’re a college student studying Mythology during your Spring 2016 semester and can actually put a face