I will be comparing Jackie from “the busy blue jay” and the rabbit from “The Velveteen Rabbit”. The author in “the busy blue jay” is olive thorn miller. This story is about a blue jay that was abandoned by his parents then a girl found him and is now his owner. He is a very active bird he always finds something to do. That is a little bit about jakie from “the busy blue jay”. The author from the velveteen rabbit is Margery williams. This story is about a rabbit that is abandoned by his owner since he was shabby and full of germs. He was abandoned because they thought the bunny gave his owner the scarlet fever. That is a little about the rabbit from “the velveteen rabbit”. The two characters have many similarities and also have many differences. …show more content…
One similarity is that they both have human like emotions. One example is that the bunny feels lonely. He fells lonely because he was thrown away and now he is not with his owner.one human like emotion jakie feels is sadness. He might feel sad because in the story is states that he was abandoned by his parents and he might feel sad because of that. Another similarity is that they both can’t provide for themselves. One example is that jakie is a house pet which means that he has no outside world experience and that leads to him not being able to provide for himself. Rabbit can’t provide for himself because he is just a stuffed animal. He can’t move his body which leads to him not being able to provide for himself. Those are some similarities between the rabbit and jakie. Here are some differences between Jackie from the rabbit. One is that jakie is very annoying since he is always hiding his owner’s things. Also he is a very clean bird, He is always cleaning up his owner’s home. Jackie is a living bird, he has a fully functioning brain and organs. That last difference is that he was abandoned then loved. He was abandoned by his parents then his owner found his and now loves him. Those are some differences between jakie from the
To begin, Gene and Finny were similar in that they both had similar characteristics, both participated in athletics, and both were members of the Super Suicide Society of the Summer Session. First, Gene and Finny had similar physical characteristics. For example, Gene and Finny were both similar in weight and height. Finny told Gene, “…you’re the same
One similarity is that Dally and Johnny do not have very great homelives. For example, Dally parents do not seem to care for him. Dally does not live with his parents and stays anywhere he can. Dally was arrested at the age of ten, which shows that no one was looking for him. Dally says to Johnny, “‘Shoot, my old man don’t give a hang whether I’m in jail or dead in a car wreck
The first similarity is the conflict of the story. The conflict of this story is when the cobras, Nag and Nagaina, are trying to get rid of Rikki, the mongoose, the boy, Ted, and his parents. In the book the cobras said, “When there are no people in the Bungalow,did we have any mongoose in the garden? So long as the Bungalow is empty, we are king and queen of the garden.” Also in the show Nagaina says “Remember as soon as our eggs in the melon bed hatch, our children will need room and quiet.” Therefore if the baby
My grandmother grew up in Americus, GA, a rural town over 100 miles south of Atlanta. Her parents were of Cherokee descent, so I asked her about any herbal remedies passed down to her. She told me of several, but the one that she remembered with the most clarity was rabbit tobacco.
At first glance the characters Connie from “Where are you going? Where have you been?” and Little Red Riding Hood from the classic fairy tale “Little Red Riding Hood” may seem to have nothing in common. However, from the start one can compare how much they actually have in common. Though these two characters are very different they are the same in many ways. Their story, from beginning to end, is similar. It is easy to see how alike and different they are with the description of Connie and Little Red Riding Hood’s lives, the relationship with their wolves, and their tragic endings.
In the story the characters are described in their own certain way. Mama Johnson is a very hard working woman that has done everything that a man can could do. Dee is a very educated optimistic woman who has never liked living in the poor way her mother and her sister Maggie use to live. She is very stuck up and very presuming. She likes to make her mother and sister feel like their worthless compared to her. Maggie on the other hand is a very shy timid girl who has always lived with Mama Johnson, and is not used to having her mother stand up for her.
The Lady or the Tiger and The Monkey’s Paw have similarities more than differences, which even gives more reasons why they are close stories. The theme crime and punishment is what the Lady or the Tiger uses, and fate and greed is what The Monkey’s Paw uses. The stories are similar in their point of view, sensory details, and the symbolism. The stories both go around the development of events that is controlled by character/character’s. These stories are frequently not following the same events, but do have events that are similar. These stories are also not made to be similar, which is pretty obvious, but share the same elements that make the story similar. The symbolism in these stories are shared by one character determining a fate of the after events. The symbolism connects the two stories, because the symbolism leads the theme and story. The point of view are the same view, which is 3rd person omniscient point-of-view. If one story has a different point-of-view, then the stories would be completely different, and would be hard to compare. The sensory details are almost the same from both of the stories, because they both build suspense in the story. All of these literary conceits contribute that these stories can be similar from the splot, but from the
Both stories have similarities in how they approach the theme. In the stories, the protagonist and the antagonist don't like each other, but at the end of the story, the protagonists start to like the antagonists. In Enemy Pie, the narrator does not like Jeremy Ross, but then they become friends at the end., In Each Kindness, Chloe didn't like Maya, but then Chloe started liking her at the end of the story. Another similarity is that there is always a new person in town. This generates feelings for the main characters which contrasts the way they feel at the end of the story, In Each Kindness, Maya is new to Chloe's town. In Enemy Pie, Jeremy Ross is new to the narrator's town. These are important details which help build/approach the common theme.
Here are the flashbacks and foreshadowing. One of the similarities is they both had to do with animals and their parents telling them something. The other is that they have flashbacks of animals. Those are the similarities with flashbacks and foreshadowing.
In conclusion, Tom and Jabez are two different people but their stories creates similar themes. Those are the unique ways of how they relate to each other including how they dealt with the two
The Rabbits by John Marsden and Shaun Tan is a simple but revealing picture book that satirically depicts the historical tragedy of the past aboriginals during the first and last settlement of the Europeans and ridiculing the Europeans behaviour using animal illustrations. The book is set in an indigenous point of view with the specific use of words and illustrations, as the story is told and viewed by the unexpected arrival of an unknown species called “The Rabbits.” This gives the readers an insight of what the story will be about and by using such illustrations that portrays the two as animals will position the readers into showing the emotions felt by the indigenous and the destructive prowess of the Europeans.
The Tale of Peter Rabbit and Voices in the Park were published at either end of the twentieth century, a period which witnessed the creation of the modern picturebook for children. They are both extremely prestigious examples of picturebooks of their type, the one very traditional, the other surrealist and postmodern. The definition of ‘picturebook’ used here is Bader’s: ‘an art form [which] hinges on the interdependence of pictures and words, on the simultaneous display of two facing pages, and on the drama of the turning of the page’ (Bader, quoted in Montgomery, 2009, p. 211). In contrast with a simple illustrated book, the picturebook can use all of the technology available to it to produce an indistinguishable whole, the meaning and value of which is dependent on the interplay between all or any of these aspects. Moebius’s claim that they can ‘portray the intangible and invisible[…], ideas that escape easy definition in pictures or words’ is particularly relevant to these two works. Potter’s book is, beneath its didactic Victorian narrative, remarkably subtle and subversive in its attitudes towards childhood, and its message to its child readers. Browne’s Voices in the Park, on the other hand, dispenses with any textual narrative; by his use of the devices of postmodernism, visual intertextuality and metaphor, he creates a work of infinite interpretation, in which the active involvement of the reader is key.
Some similarities are revolve around the animals playing a big part in how the earth was formed and discovered. The animals in both stories were present first according to the stories.
The Tale of Peter Rabbit was a fictional story for children written by Beatrix Potter. The main character of the story was Peter Rabbit, who had three sisters by the names of Flopsy, Mopsy, and Cotton-tail. The four bunnies lived with their mother, Mrs. Rabbit, underneath a huge tree in the woods. All the characters displayed the element of anthropomorphic because they are dressed in human clothing and display human characteristics such as walking straight up on their hind legs. The three sisters were wearing a pink to reddish cloak, Peter Rabbit a blue jacket with brown shoes, and the mother a blue chambermaid dress. While Peter Rabbit’s sisters were obedient little bunnies who gathered blackberries, Peter Rabbit was a naughty, disobedient and mischievous young rabbit who gave into temptation rather than to listen to direction.
The biggest similarity between the two stories is the notion of moral decline; the beings start off as peaceful things that don’t need homes, food or anything. As time goes on they need those things and more. After a while they start stealing from each other and eventually hurt each other.