Was the intrusion based on a lawful objective, such as a valid arrest, detention, search, frisk, community warden guardian of mentally ill, defense of an officer or a citizen, or to prevent escape? If these answer yes then an officer may have legal ability to use the levels of force listed below to apprehend the suspect. Another list of things to consider when determining if it was a lawful use of force is; was the use of force relative to the person’s confrontation? Was there a crucial need to terminate the condition? Even though there is no duty to retreat, could the officer have used lesser force and still safely accomplish the lawful objective? These are the questions that the jury need to answer to determine if they should side with or against the officer in any court case brought to them that deals with such a controversial topic as this.
According to the Dictionary of Policing, “Force is the exercise of physical coercion by the police in the performance of their duties” (Rappert). While many believe that the use of force by police is not needed and only causes more problems, there are also people who support officers and their use of force in order to protect. Police should be able to use force without opposition to detain people trying to harm others, save their own lives, and stop escalating situations.
The purpose is to explain the necessity and the alternatives to deadly force. Necessity of deadly force will include laws that have been passed by the United States Supreme Court, training methods and policies of Federal, State and Local agencies Alternatives to deadly force are less-lethal weapons that are used by law enforcement today, TASERS, pepper spray, bean bag guns and batons. Does deadly force need to be used against violent suspects?
There are very few careers with as high demands for an ethical standard as law enforcement. Although there are many careers, which require a dedication to doing the right thing, it is undeniable that there is a tremendous degree of responsibility and expectations placed on the police officer. While most professions allow for careful thought and planning, a police officer is often thrust into a situation with little advanced intelligence about what is occurring. Often an officer is involved in a situation which has the potential to turn violent. Relying on training allows the officer to successfully navigate a variety of situations.
Deadly Force Applications
Sacramento Police Department: Besides talking about use of force in general, no specific mention of used of deadly force is mentioned.
San Bernardino Police Department: Again, very similar departments such as the one in Duluth, Minnesota, and Anaheim, California, the SBPD policy states that the use of deadly force is reasonable in the following scenarios: to keep peace officers, or others, safe from death or grave harm, to make an arrest of someone who is believed to have committed a felony and used or threatened deadly force, or to make an arrest of someone who is attempting to commit a felony and the officer believes the person may use deadly force if he/she is not captured. Moreover, use of deadly force towards a
With my research, one can see how this controversy has two very distinct sides, however, what facts that aren’t as evident in my writing fall into a grey area. I conducted my research by mainly shifting through several online journals and newspapers using the database called News Bank. Since this issue is very local I decided that the Albuquerque Journal would be the best source. Most of the journal articles were either supporting the idea of police abusing their power or defending the police’s right to self-defense, however, there were several periodicals that suggest a neutral ground between the two extremes. These articles suggested that it was solely biased on the situation in which each officer was in and to never assume that all situations in which an officer faces the decision to use deadly force will be identical or justified.
Each and every-day of our lives we are protected by men and women in the police force. Police officers must handle extremely dangerous situations like fights, robberies, or even riots. During riots police officers use many weapons to subdue rioters, but sometimes the less lethal weapons can be just as bad as the lethal ones.
When does deadly force cross the line and when does officer feels his/her life is grave danger and to escape has to use deadly force? What circumstances will justify the use of deadly force? Deadly Force depends on the officer discretion, when the officer makes the decision to investigate suspects. Also it depends on the how strongly the officers follow the Code of Ethics. In the Code of Ethics in paragraph 3 it reads “I will enforce the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will , never employing force or violence and never accepting gratuities.” So an officer who truly follows the Code of Ethics I think would be less likely to use deadly force, and the officer probably has a higher tolerance than a officer who doesn’t follow the Code of Ethics so closely. The Bureau of Justice statistics in 2001 reported nearly 400 felons died from use of deadly force. But also when an officer decides to use deadly force they must be thinking if their actions are going to be justifiable through the publics eye and their police department and so forth. So many things come into ...
Police are generally held to a slightly less stringent standard than civilians in light of the inherent danger of their occupation and the need to protect the public from dangerous individuals. Thus, police are generally able to use lethal force in any setting provided that they have a reasonable belief that a suspect poses a risk of imminent bodily harm to the officer or a member of the public. Police can’t use deadly force against someone who is they know to be unarmed in some situations where that person shows no immediate threat, such as a suspect who is fleeing or someone who has already been restrained
An officer may use deadly force in only five circumstances. The five circumstances go like this: self defense, defense of others, to prevent the theft from using nuclear weapons or explosives, special nuclear devices, and to prevent a suspect from escaping, but only if the officer has probable cause to believe that the suspect has committed any offenses that are listed above. Sixty nine percent of the victims of police brutality in the United States who are African-American/Black were suspected of a non-violent crime and were unarmed. People who are unarmed pose NO threat. “Police departments across the country too often use excessive force, injuring and occasionally killing people who pose little threat”