Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of doctor faustus
Critically comment on the conclusion of Dr faustus
Analysis of doctor faustus
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of doctor faustus
The two versions of Christopher Marlowe’s “Dr.Faustus” have similar storylines but different in the details, such as the university Faustus attended-Wittenberg in A-text, Württemberg in the B-text. In both texts, Faustus obnoxiously gains all of God’s knowledge within the universe by resorting to the Devil’s power. However, the A and B text versions of the play display a separation between radical Protestant and conservative Catholic views in the 1600’s. The most profound difference between the two versions of the play is Faustus’s dramatic death in the B-text versus his subtle exit with Mephistopheles and the Devil in the A-text. The divergence in the educational and astronomical references foreshadows Faustus’s punishment throughout each version of the play. It seems that Marlowe intended to provoke his audience by collectively developing a religious catharsis by utilizing blasphemy. English professor David Anderson explains how Marlowe achieves his audience’s reaction, “Marlowe works in a specifically religious register, playing upon religious difference, inflaming religious antagonism, and complicating the polarities and expectations of mainstream Protestant society” (Anderson 79). Does each version of Dr Faustus represent a response to a shift in religious ideology during the Elizabethan period? I may suggest that the differences between the A and B texts in the final scene reflect cultural tensions during the religious reformation in England. Marlowe resided in France while he served Queen Elizabeth and was witness to the French religious reformation of Catholicism; this may have influenced the B-text version, written in 1616. In the Norton Anthology of Drama, Shorter Edition, the editors stated, “This ‘service’ surely i... ... middle of paper ... ...eatre: A Journal Associated with the Records of Early English Drama 12 (2009): 141-49. MLA International Bibliography. Web. 6 Oct. 2013. . Robert Ornstein. “Marlowe and God: The Tragic Theology of Dr. Faustus”, PLMA Vol. 83, No. 5 (Oct. 1968): pp. 1378-1385. Modern Language Association.Web.2 Dec. 2013. < http://www.jstor.org/stable/1261310> Gainor, J. Ellen., Stanton B. Garner, and Martin Puchner. “The Norton Anthology of Drama, Shorter Edition”. New York: W. W. Norton &, 2010. Print. Duxfield, A. (2008), “Teaching & Learning Guide for: Modern Problems of Editing: The Two Texts of Marlowe's Doctor Faustus”. Literature Compass. Web.8.Dec.2013. 5: 681–684. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-4113.2008.00536.x Corp. Catholic Book Publishing. “The New American Bible”. Saint Joseph Edition. New York: NY Catholic Book Publishing, 1992. Print.
...yne A. The HarperCollins Study Bible New Revised Standard Edition . New York: HarperCollins Publishers, 1993. 1645-1722. Print.
Davidson, Stibbs, and Kevan The New Bible Commentary W M B WM B Eerdmands publishing company Copyright June 1965
Revised Standard Version Catholic Edition Bible. Eds. Dom Bernand Orchard, Rev. R. V. Fuller. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 1966. Print.
Mowat, Barbara A. and Paul Werstine, ed. Introduction. Shakespeare: Othello. New York: Washington Square Press, 1993.
Dutton, R., & Howard, J.E. (2003). A Companion to Shakespeare’s Works.(p. 9) Maiden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Clark, W. G. and Wright, W. Aldis , ed. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Vol. 1. New York: Nelson-Doubleday
Cohen, Walter, J.E. Howard, K. Eisaman Maus. The Norton Shakespeare. Vol. 2 Stephen Greenblatt, General Editor. New York, London. 2008. ISBN 978-0-393-92991-1
The Elizabethan Stage, 4 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1923. Clark, Eleanor G., 1941. Ralegh and Marlowe: A Study in Elizabethan Fustian.’ New.
Murray, John. The New International Commentary on the New Testament. The Epistle to the Romans. (Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1968)
Doctor Faustus is a doctor of theology that wants no limits on what he can know or see or do so he sells his soul to the devil to gain these desires. While reading or observing Marlowe's fascinating play the reader or observer should apply the "New Historicism Approach," and take in to consideration Marlowe's and the 1590s society's beliefs, habits of thought, and biases about various concepts of obtaining the "forbidden knowledge". Like the people of the 1590s, Doctor Faustus searches for the "forbidden knowledge", begins to deny God during his quest for greater knowledge, and gains nothing from his vain activities throughout his lifetime. After these listed characteristics have been established one can begin to visualize the relationship between Marlowe's, Doctor Faustus and the beliefs and thoughts of the people of the 1590s.
Bevington, David M; Rasmussen, Eric. “Doctor Faustus A- and B- texts (1604, 1616): Christopher Marlowe and his collaborator and revisers.” Manchester, England: Manchester University Press. (1962). Academic Search Complete. Web. 5 Dec. 2013 (Bevington)
Marlowe, Christopher. The Tragedy of Doctor Faustus. Ed. Louis B. Wright. New York: Washington Square Press, 1959.
Marlowe, Christopher. The Tragical History of D. Faustus. In Renaissance Drama: An Anthology of Plays and Entertainments. Edited by A.F. Kinney. Massachusetts: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 2002.
The. Marlowe, Christopher. The. Dr. Faustus. New York: Dover, 1994. Print.
Marlowe reflects ambition in the character of Faustus to deter the audience from being ambitious, and over-reaching their place in the laws of the church. Marlowe uses symbols of religion to fill the play such as the use of the dark arts, angles, demons, God, the Devil, quotes from the bible, the symbol of blood, and the use of the seven sins. With the use of these icons he humou...