The Transition to Postmodernism

The Transition to Postmodernism

Works Cited Not Included

Postmodernism is a difficult term to define, as it is evident in many different disciplines, such as art, literature, architecture, technology, and, the precise emerging moment of this movement is also hard to identify. In order to truly understand `Postmodernism,' one must first identify with `Modernism' and it's subsequent decline which led to the appearance of the Post-modern ear. It is often suggested that Postmodernity is simply a continuation or advancement of Modernity. For example, Bauman, (Crook, Pakulski, & Walters, 1992: p.2) claims that `Postmodernism is simply a replacement of "classical" Modern capitalist society'. However, this assumption has undergone much debate and criticism. Those who reject this notion, maintain that Postmodernism is in fact a historical movement in it's own right, generating a distinct society from that of Modernism. Perry Anderson is one such optimist. In my essay I wish to present a summary of Anderson's attempt to offer a historical account of the decline of modernism and the transition to Postmodernism. I will begin by paying some attention to Anderson's Modernity and Revolution, which pursues the path of Modernism from the onset. Following this, I will engage in examination of, The Origins of Postmodernity, (1998), in which he offers a comprehendable account and subtle critique of Postmodernism, observing it's origins and implications. These two texts combined will allow me to present Anderson's credible account of Modernism's closing stages and the succession of Postmodernism. Throughout the essay I resolve to propose my own opinion of Anderson's `persuasive' abilities.

Until the end of the modern capitalist period, society ...

... middle of paper ...

...notions of `periodization' or timing; when exactly Postmodernism emerged. It was here that I was concerned with the changing aspects of the bourgeoisie, the academic establishment (or avant-garde), technology, and, politics. I also focused on Anderson's `polarities'; the way in which Postmodernism transitioned itself in contrast to Modernism. He acknowledges the universally accepted features of the movements in general and presents them in a more explicable and comprehendable manner. He also evokes the help of renowned thinkers such as Berman and Jameson, which gives his report more validity and support, but he also exhibits the ability to respectfully pinpoint some of their omissions, i.e. Berman. It is for these reasons that I consider Anderson as offering offers a truly persuasive historical account of the decline of Modernism and the transition to Postmodernism.