Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
exmine the imporyance of scarcity and choice in economics
scarcity and choice in economics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
There are three concepts i.e. scarcity, choice and opportunity cost that explains this view. The basic assumption is that people cannot get everything they want, and have to do without it. This scarcity results in a choice, which comes at a cost. This is the opportunity cost, which is the next best alternative declined. This cost is not measured in financial terms. The concept of scarcity choice and opportunity cost can be graphically depicted by using the production possibility frontier. The choice between either transport or cost for other goods and services (OGS) can be produced in finite quantities. In explaining the production possibility frontier, using the same content as above, If the cost of other goods and services increases from OGS1 to OGS 2 on the graph, transport cost decreased from T1 to T2. If the OGS decreases from OGS2 to OGS3, then transport cost increases from T1 to T2. The reduction represents the opportunity cost. Therefore point ‘g’ on the graph on the OGS axis is attainable. It presents a position of inefficiency as society is not utilizing the full potential...
Threat of Substitutes - Low – Buses, boats, trains and cars are substitutes but usually not cost or time effective substitutes for most consumers
Every society should answer three economic questions, which are what to produce? , how to produce? , for whom to produce? The reason why a society should choose what to produce is because a product of one society’s choice is not necessarily the choice of the other choice. A society should decide how to produce goods, it is due to the fact that not all societies have the same resources, some societies may have a lot of people in them so, if they want to produce a good, they can use their human resources to accomplished their task, in the other hand societies with a low populations but a high amount of machines, can use their resources to finish their task. Some countries may be able to provide items that other countries can not, because their economy is better than those countries.
In the article “Opportunity Cost Consideration”, Stephen Spiller aims at addressing the various issues that are involved in the decision making process of consumers. Spiller argues that buyers need to involve the concept of opportunity cost in their purchasing decisions so that they can manage to meet their unlimited wants using limited resources (Spiller 595). In relation to this, the article focuses on when buyers should embrace opportunity cost, individuals or parties that embrace opportunity cost, opportunity cost that spring into buyers’ minds and consequences involved in the consideration of the opportunity cost. The author accomplishes his goal by conducting several studies. These studies are fall under various categories such as application of multiple mechanisms in assessing opportunity cost consideration, self-reported consideration, thought listings and possibility of purchase. Thus, the author’s findings play a vital role in highlighting consumers’ need to embrace opportunity costs in their purchase decisions.
Scarcity implies that human needs for merchandise, goods, and services surpass what is available. Resources, for example, labor, apparatuses, land, and raw/crude materials are important to deliver the products and services we need yet they exist in constrained supply.
...s to raw materials. For example, a person might want to be a farmer. In order to do this in the original state of nature, he would need to acquire land, animals, and materials to build his farm. He would then only be able to produce as much as he could use and as would not infringe upon the ability to produce or acquire necessary property by others. However, with the introduction of money, even if he could not buy the land for his own farm, he could seek other economic endeavors that would be just as personally beneficial. Instead of owning his own small farm, he could work in a grocery store and obtain the same amount of relative personal property via his earned wages, and these could be used to purchase all of his necessities. Higher levels of industry encouraged by the use of money reduce the risk that individuals cannot meet the opportunities they are seeking,
...iolation of capitalistic having. The system of having is controlling our mind and way of life. If we as a capitalistic society were truly concerned about cost, we would give being more focus. Being is free and takes practice, but it saves a lot of money.
This essay will define what the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) or Gross National Product (GNP) is and how the circular flow chart is dependent on an equal flow in and out of the economy. The thesis for the essay is that society should not place the highest priority upon the pursuit of economic growth; this will be supported with evidence. It will also briefly argue the opponents side on why GDP should be the highest priority.
Economics is a science that examines how the individual side of people made a choice. Viewed with or without the use of means of exchange (money) in order to utilize scarce resources in producing a range of goods and services, and distribute it among them for consumption purposes, at present or in the future, among various individuals and community groups ( Samuelson, 1979). From the description of proficiency level, there is one thing that the main problem faced by humans in all fields of harnessing everything or scarcity. That's the main problem, was born two underlying reasons for the presence of economics as the study of human behavior. First, the limited resources for life, society, organizations and individuals. Second, the fact that the needs (needs) and desire
To much choice has more negatives than positives. For example, too much choice can cause paralysis instead of liberation. Due to too many options, people may not chose at all because it is too difficult. Also, if one does pick an option out of many, they will end up less satisfied because they believe that an alternative choice would’ve been a better option; this phenomenon is due to opportunity cost since much regret follows this dissatisfaction of one’s decision. Likewise, escalation of expectations arises because with the addition of options, people’s expectations increase but get less satisfaction with the results because they aren’t as good as they expected; therefore, the key to happiness is low expectations. This idea is why material affluence enables all choice in industrial societies; this is not prevalent in poor countries. Consequently, income redistribution makes everyone better off since surplus choice is bad for people. Overall, the Official dogma is incorrect because more choices doesn’t increase a person’s
Not everything that is expensive is better. Rich people can get everything they want, but middle class people need to think if they need it, or they can find the same thing cheaper. Most people try to find cheaper things, but some buy expensive things, because they think that it will help them to feel that they are rich. First, people buy those expensive things, and after that they are in debt. Expensive things need a lot of money, but people don’t have them, so they use credit cards to buy for that. According to the article “All that glitters is not gold” says that auto exhibition 32% of attendees bought a car and 56% of attendees reported they were going to buy a car in the near future. It shows that that people don’t have money, but they saw that other people bought the car, and they want it also. My parents just last week bought a new car, because our old one broke. My dad said that everyone has big, and new cars, so we need to buy a costly car like other people have. I thought that it was a stupid idea to look at expensive car, but anyway he found a good car, nor costly, nor cheap car. It is middle cost, and it is a wonderful car. Running after expansive things people forget to look of prices. They forget that they will need to pay for that thing for many years after they buy
Humans live in a world in which every day they encounter numerous choices. The way they decide and the outcomes of their decisions define their lives. Their day to day life essentially revolves around the choices they make. As a whole, a community benefits or suffers from the outcomes of its choices. Freedom of choice is the grant to an individual or community to make its own choices out of free will and without restrictions (Pereboom,2003). This is essay will discuss that though freedom choice leads to variety in life, it does not necessarily guarantee satisfaction. It will also argue that although some choice is undoubtedly better than none, more is not always better than less. It will then consider the implications of the paradox of choice for individuals in the market place and education, and for society in politics.
Finding ways to move goods from one point to another at a reasonable cost and within an acceptable time frame is a growing challenge for global businesses today. The costs and risks associated with transportation are increasing with the advent of globalization and low-cost-country sourcing. Even for companies with local operations only, they have to supply their products to various parts of a country which increases the costs and risks. Since the cost of gasoline has been on an upward trend, high level of efficiency in transportation is required to lower the costs involved and the risks associated with the costs. Costs concepts in transportation include economic, social and accounting costs. The risks and costs involved increases if the various modes of transport are used. There has been concern over many businesses failure to strategically think when they employ multimodal transportation services. Many businesses prefer the least expensive multimodal model instead of choosing the most effective; this trade-off is very expensive with hidden costs and risks increasing significantly (Molenaar, Anderson, Schexnayder, National Research Council (U.S.)., National Cooperative Highway Research Program., American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials., & United States, 2010).
- Heyne, P. (n.d.). Efficiency. Library of Economics and Liberty. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/Efficiency.html
...ll ensure general growth rate of given economy. It also shows the different opinions held by an individual or organization in a two-good model. By definition, all the curves have an efficient production, but depending on the nature of the market some will be more productive than others. The given equilibrium of an economy given PPF will be the combination of the given outputs that is most profitable. It basically shows the production possibilities in that economy over a given period of time. Factors such as market failure can at times arise, these may be due to imperfect competition or other externalities’ not taken into account. These can lead to wrong grouping of goods being produced hence wrong mixing and allocation of needed resources. These can be different to what the consumer really given what is consumable on the given production possibility frontier (PPF).
Do the poor in this country have a choice not to be poor? Do the less fortunate have the same access to opportunities as the middle and upper classes? Do government programs designed to help the impoverished actually keep them in the lower ranks? These are all difficult and controversial questions. Conservatives and Liberals constantly battle over these issues in our state and federal governments. Local and national news media provide limited insight to the root causes and effects of the nation’s poor. There is obviously no simple solution to resolve the plight of these often forgotten citizens. Most of us associate poor as being in a class below the poverty line. In fact there are many levels of poverty ranging from those with nothing, to those with enough to survive but too little to move up. I believe many of our nation’s poor are so by their own doing. I will share observations and personal experiences to support the argument that being poor often is a result of individual choice. One needs merely inspiration and perspiration to move up the socio-economic ladder in the United States. We live in the land of opportunity where anyone with the drive and determination to succeed often can.