Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Society in fahrenheit 451 vs modern society
Society analysis of brave new world by aldous huxley
Society in fahrenheit 451
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Society in fahrenheit 451 vs modern society
Today’s world is far from a utopia, or perfect world with no negative thoughts or feelings, but is that a good or a bad thing? Aldous Huxley’s, Brave New World, and Ray Bradbury’s, Fahrenheit 451, show several similar effects of what may happen to the human race if the government over-controls the countries’ citizens. In Brave New World the controlling government, or the “World State,” uses brainwashing and chemical persuasion to make the people of the country believe and follow the value of the society. In Fahrenheit 451, the government forbids the use of books to prevent the citizens from learning about the history of the world. The government goes from house to house burning every book in sight. Both of these types of governments cause a threat of physical, emotional, and mental abuse for those who disagree with the ways of the established group.
Both Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451 show the physical and mental abuse that a human may face if they go against the ways of a the government and society. In Fahrenheit 451, Montag begins to wonder about the reason for why he is burning books and what makes them so bad. When he is at the old women’s house, a book falls into his hands “like a white pigeon, wings fluttering, ” (Bradbury 37). Without thinking, Montag places the book inside his jacket. After getting home from work, he starts to suffer mental abuse from taking the book. Montag reads some of the book and begins to wonder and argue with Mildred, his wife, on why he is a fireman.
Montag starts a plot to destroy the system of firemen by placing books in their houses. The plan is soon broken up; Montag ends up burning his own house and his captain, Beatty. Montag is now facing a threat of physical abuse from the gove...
... middle of paper ...
...d from the over controlling government.
Brave New World and Fahrenheit 451 are great warning signs for today’s societies and one of the future. Negative things such as violence and the use of drugs may not be good, but going to great extents to prevent these may not be the solution. I believe the solution is to better enforce the laws created by the government and keep previous offenders off the streets for good.
Works Cited
Schmerl, Rudolf B. "Aldous Huxley's Social Criticism." Chicago Review (Winter-Spring, 1959): 37-58.
Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1932.
Huxley, A. (2004). Chemical Persuasion. In A. Huxley, Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited (pp. 296-303). New York: Harper Perenials.
Huxley, A. (2004). Brainwashing. In A. Huxley, Brave New World and Brave New World Revisited (pp. 287-295). New York: Harper Perenials.
In the book Fahrenheit 451 the theme is a society/world that revolves around being basically brain washed or programmed because of the lack of people not thinking for themselves concerning the loss of knowledge, and imagination from books that don't exist to them. In such stories as the Kurt Vonnegut's "You have insulted me letter" also involving censorship to better society from vulgarity and from certain aspects of life that could be seen as disruptive to day to day society which leads to censorship of language and books. Both stories deal with censorship and by that society is destructed in a certain way by the loss of knowledge from books.
Few books exemplify the consequences of misconceptions more than Farenheit 451. The book speaks of a world in which in citizens think they are living in a utopia, when in fact their world is constantly devoloving into a place where no human could ever flourish. This delusion along with the misconception that books are thing to be feared is the precise reason that the general populace is so easily controlled. The reason behind the propaganda campaign against books is so the people do not realize that their lives are unsatisfying and dull. In other words, this, misconception propagated by the governing force, fuels the illusion of a perfect world. The myth that the world...
Montag sits back and begins to question the ways of the world. Why are books perceived to be dangerous? Why are those that worship them considered dangerous? Motivated and looking for answers Guy steals a book from a house where is he sent to burn down. When asking the old owner of the collection to vacate the house she refuses. This makes Guy even more curious, making he wonder if her dedication shows that happiness can really be found in books. Forced and pressured by his peers he must eliminate the house and the old lady within. After returning home and Montag learns that he has lived his whole life a lie. Instead of serving the public like he...
Often, dystopian novels are written by an author to convey a world that doesn’t exist, but criticizes aspects of the present that could lead to this future. Ray Bradbury wrote Fahrenheit 451 in 1951 but discusses issues that have only increased over time. The encompassing issue that leads to the dystopic nature of this novel is censorship of books. The government creates a world in which it is illegal to have any books. Firemen are enforcers of this law by being the ones to burn the books and burn the buildings where the books were found. By censoring the knowledge found in books, the government attempts to rid the society of corruption caused by “the lies” books are filled with in hopes the people will never question. In Fahrenheit 451, censorship is a paradox.
The theme of Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451 can be viewed from several different angles. First and foremost, Bradbury's novel gives an anti-censorship message. Bradbury understood censorship to be a natural outcropping of an overly tolerant society. Once one group objects to something someone has written, that book is modified and censorship begins. Soon, another minority group objects to something else in the book, and it is again edited until eventually the book is banned altogether. In Bradbury's novel, society has evolved to such an extreme that all literature is illegal to possess. No longer can books be read, not only because they might offend someone, but because books raise questions that often lead to revolutions and even anarchy. The intellectual thinking that arises from reading books can often be dangerous, and the government doesn't want to put up with this danger. Yet this philosophy, according to Bradbury, completely ignores the benefits of knowledge. Yes, knowledge can cause disharmony, but in many ways, knowledge of the past, which is recorded in books, can prevent man from making similar mistakes in the present and future.
Fahrenheit 451’s relevance to today can be very detailed and prophetic when we take a deep look into our American society. Although we are not living in a communist setting with extreme war waging on, we have gained technologies similar to the ones Bradbury spoke of in Fahrenheit 451 and a stubborn civilization that holds an absence on the little things we should enjoy. Bradbury sees the future of America as a dystopia, yet we still hold problematic issues without the title of disaster, as it is well hidden under our Democracy today. Fahrenheit 451 is much like our world today which includes television, the loss of free speech, and the loss of the education and use of books.
In Bradbury’s dystopia, books are banned and are to be burned if found, because they cause people to become too intellectual. In The Giver, a supposed utopia, the government tells the members of the community what jobs they will have, and how many children are acceptable in each family. In each of the novels, the main characters, reveal their deep animosity towards the government and its policies. They work to end the prolonged oppression faced. The Hunger Games and Fahrenheit 451 attempt to change for the better; On the contrary The Giver takes a turn for the worst. Contemporary works, such as The Hunger Games, Fahrenheit 451, and The Giver, portray utopic and dystopic societies through the eyes of the narrators, and the properties of these societies are inverted as the government’s of each novel oppress the citizens. The elements of idealistic societies, generally develop into dystopias; Whereas dystopian societies begin to adapt to quixotic ideals as the narrators begin to see the world
In his novel Brave New World, Aldous Huxley illustrates ways in which government and advanced science control society. Through actual visualization of this Utopian society, the reader is able to see how this state affects Huxley’s characters. Throughout the book, the author deals with many different aspects of control. Whether it is of his subjects’ feelings and emotions or of the society’s restraint of population growth, Huxley depicts government’s and science’s role in the brave new world of tomorrow.
Throughout the book, many difficult questions about the nature of moral choices are raised. The plot is concentrated on the various abuses of power made possible by science. I believe that Huxley was not lashing out against science, but more offering a warning, the new world is not evil because of science, but because power hungry individuals have misused it maliciously. The theme of Brave New World is “not the advancement of science as such; it is the advancement of science as it affects human individuals” (Brave New World, page XI). The devastating affects through the misuse of science, philosophy and control are portrayed through this book.
This dream of forming and maintaining a utopian society was immortalized in two novels dealing with the same basic ideas, 1984 by George Orwell and Brave New World by Aldous Huxley. Both of these novels deal with the lives of main characters that inadvertently become subversives in a totalitarian government. These two books differ greatly however with the manner in which the government controls the population and the strictness of the measures taken to maintain this stability. This essay with compare and contrast the message and tone of each novel as well as consider whether the utopia is a positive or negative one.
Fahrenheit 451 illustrates a realistic future society where the definition of thought and reason are unknown. Books are banned because they contain too many conflicting ideas and therefore offer no actual value. Every moment of the citizens’ lives is full of stimulation, whether wall-sized interactive television, murdering strangers, or listening to music on wireless radio headsets. Everyone is taught not to ask questions or think beyond the decision of which show to watch. Being a pedestrian is something one can be arrested for and the concept of casually chatting or watching the world pass-by is considered suspicious activity.
In Fahrenheit 451, the government exercised censorship supposedly for the purpose of happiness. Through technology and media, the government was able to eliminate individuality by manipulating the mind of the people into believing the propaganda of what happiness is. The people’s ignorance made them obediently abide that they failed to realize how far technology and the media have taken control of their minds. The free thought of characters such as Montag and Clarisse collided with that of Captain Beatty, who strongly believe in and enforce the censorship, and the firemen, whose role was to burn illegal books; these clashes were Bradbury’s way
Dystopian novels like "Fahrenheit 451" contain themes and messages that cannot be suppressed. The value in not banning "Fahrenheit 451" substantially outweighs any reason to ban the book. In a world where "Fahrenheit 451" is banned, the population would not be able to see areas in society while require improvement and therefore, the individuals would be unable to incite change. Moreover, if the book was banned, the people would become monotonous and deficient in their ability to synthesize innovative ideas. Supporters of the ban often cite religious reservations as their reason to ban the book. The problems behind their argument is that their reservations are self-centered and inconsiderate of others considering the diversity and size of the nation. If "Fahrenheit 451" is banned, the results would be cataclysmic. Whether to ban a book is no easy decision, but in the case of "Fahrenheit 451", the answer is simple: not to ban "Fahrenheit
In the futuristic novel, the government orders the burning of all books and makes it illegal to read them. This burning of books in the story also allows more government control over the people by imposing a clamp over the flow of ideas that makes up our advancing society today. In the book, the people are like the puppets on strings in the hands of the government who acts as the puppeteer. The citizens of that time have no will of the their own but must believe what the government tells them.
This book can be a warning to humanity, telling society that brainwashing can become common and destroy the modern day world. This book makes the people of the modern day world think about what could happen in the near future if society decides to go farther and more into scientific research. Misuses in science could contribute to the making of man into an animal, not a smart, adapted, emotional connected human being. In “Brave New World,” Huxley creates a world that is complete and utterly disturbing to what humanity could become. The people in the World State are controlled through psychological conditioning on a ground breaking scale.