Robin Mather's Article: The Threats From Genetically Modified Food

1215 Words3 Pages

Considering an argument as valid requires critical analysis of several aspects and providing strong evidence. Robin Mather, a journalist who “has passion for food and its sources, has worked at major metropolitan newspapers (the Detroit News, the Chicago Tribune)”(86), argues that GMOs have risks and hazards to human health and threats to wildlife and environment in her article “The Threats from Genetically Modified Foods”, whereas Entine, a colleague at the Genetic Literacy Project, and Wendel, a science writer(82), claim that GMOs are safe to eat and no harm to people or animals in their article “2000+Reasons Why GMOs are Safe to Eat and Environmentally Sustainable” Both articles’ authors state their ideas clearly for whether GMOs could be eaten or not. However, Mather provides more solid …show more content…

She provides some excellent examples to analyze logically and solid evidence to persuade readers to agree with her views, such as she begins with Roundup-Ready which could cause cancer and damage to DNA that would catch readers’ attention wondering how. Then follows the definition of GMOs and how they perform which may cause unpredictable harm and hazard to humans for the Bt crops can damage the ileum and kill beneficial insects, Roundup causes effects on environment and damage soil, GM milk raises the high level of risk of breast and prostate cancer, and GMOs can’t help to end hunger. All of those statements are proved by the solid evidence that Mather gives. Mather also gives the historical events to support her ideas effectively, and she ends of some suggestions about what consumers should do, such as GMOs labeling, growing own food, buying organic, etc. Clearly, Mather has a convincing argument by providing the solid evidence and logical analysis throughout her

Open Document