The Supreme Court
The Supreme Court has had many different places where it was located over the years. There has been a struggle to find a permanent home for the most powerful court of law. At first, the meetings were in the Merchant Exchange Building in New York City. The court then followed the nation's capitol to Philadelphia in 1790. In 1800 the court again relocated to Washington DC. At first they spent their time meeting in various places. The place to find the Supreme Court now is in Washington DC, on First Street located in Northeast.
The Supreme court was created during the Constitutional Convention of 1787 during which the delegates discussed the necessity of a Supreme Court. The two major reasons for the need of this type of court was going to be to settle the conflicts that may arise between states, and the fact that there would be a court that would have to maintain the uniformity of the federal law. Article III vested the judicial power in "one Supreme Court" , and such inferior courts as the Congress may form from time to time…"
The Supreme Court of the United States has several different types of cases which they generally hear. The first of these are controversies in which the United States is a party. Another categories of cases are ones in which there is a conflict between different states, as well as cases in which the parties involved are from different states. The federal question jurisdiction includes cases that are under the Constitution or federal statutes and or treaties. Cases that involve admiralty and maritime law are also heard by the Supreme Court. This court is considered to be the final arbitrator between the assertion of power and the restrictions on power derived fr...
... middle of paper ...
...listering dissent of the state court's 4-3 ruling upholding use of the chair last month.
The decision came less than an hour after the state Supreme Court granted Anthony Bryan a two-day stay to pursue federal appeals. Bryan was scheduled to go to the electric chair at 7 a.m. recently for the 1983 murder of a watchman abducted in Mississippi.
Bryan's lawyer, Andrew Thomas, called the decision "monumental." Gov. Jeb Bush was surprised and disappointed with the decision Florida House Speaker John Thrasher said he found the court's decision "terribly frustrating." This case is being heard by the Supreme Court and will be one, which will set a trend and a standard among the states with regards to the punishment of convicts. It will decide and define cruel and unusual punishment with regard to individuals convicted of crimes and sentenced to certain punishments.
Lower courts gave him no reprieve, though, and Hall petitioned the Supreme Court for relief based on Hitchcock v. Dugger (1987), a case in which the Court found that “all mitigating factors, not just statutory mitigation, should be considered by the judge and jury” . The Court did not find Hall to have an adequate claim, and the governor of Florida signed Hall’s second death warrant in September 1988. When Hall filed his second claim to the Court, again claiming procedural error under Hitchcock, it this time determined that an error had occurred and granted him a new sentencing proceeding. At the 1993 trial, the court found Hall mentally retarded yet competent enough to stand trial; it again sentenced him to death.
In the late 1700s, it was apparent that the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation did not establish the type of government needed to keep the nation together as a nation-state. The American people needed to find a more effective way to govern themselves and this was no easy feat. Most Americans had varying political thoughts in the 18th century. The challenge because how to best take care of the masses in a fair and equitable way. In May 1787, a group of delegated appointed by the state governments met in Philadelphia for The Constitutional Convention. This group decided they could not revise the Articles of Confederation and decided to create a reasonable national system. This
In United States, there is a dual court system. The dual court system is divided into Federal Courts and State Courts. Each hears different type of cases; neither is completely different of the other. The Constitution of the United States gives powers to the federal courts and reserves the rest for the state.
The Court created the power from the Constitution, since only certain cases can be brought to the Supreme Court, and when Congress said the
The present members of the Supreme Court are as follows: William Hubbs Rhenquist, Chief Justice: born 1924 in Wisconsin, graduated Stanford Law School. He was an assistant Attorney General from 1969 till 1971 when President Nixon appointed him to the Court. 1986 President Reagan appointed him Chief Jus...
The Supreme Court, which sees almost 150 petitions per week, called cert petitions, must carefully select the cases that they want to spend their time and effort on (Savage 981). If they didn’t select them carefully, the nine justices would quickly be overrun, so they have put in place a program to weed through the court cases to pick out the small number they will discuss. There are a few criteria that are used to judge whether or not a case will be tried. The first is whether or not the lower courts decided the case based on another one of the Supreme Court’s decisions for they will investigate these in order to withhold or draw back their conclusion that they made in their court case. Another is the case’s party alignment: sometimes the justices will pick cases that will align with their party beliefs, like trying to get a death row inmate off of his death sentence. They also make claims about the “life” of the case- the Supreme Court only hears “live” cases- they do not try to go back in time and re-mark a case that has long since been decided (Savage 981). Lastly, they like to take cases where the lower courts did not decide with one another -these cases can have t o do with interpretations of the law that have been left up to the lower courts and should be specifically defined by the Supreme Court (Savage 982).
The life of every American citizen, whether they realize it or not, is influenced by one entity--the United States Supreme Court. This part of government ensures that the freedoms of the American people are protected by checking the laws that are passed by Congress and the actions taken by the President. While the judicial branch may have developed later than its counterparts, many of the powers the Supreme Court exercises required years of deliberation to perfect. In the early years of the Supreme Court, one man’s judgement influenced the powers of the court systems for years to come. John Marshall was the chief justice of the Supreme Court from 1801 to 1835, and as the only lasting Federalist influence in a newly Democratic-Republican government, he and his fellow justices sought to perpetuate their Federalist principles in the United States’ court system. In one of the most memorable court cases of all time--the case of Marbury v. Madison-- Marshall established the idea of judicial review and strengthened the power of the judicial branch in the government. Abiding by his Federalist ideals, Marshall decided cases that would explicitly limit the power of the state government and broaden the strengths of the national government. Lastly, the Marshall Court was infamous for determining the results of cases that dealt with the interpretation of the Constitution and the importance of contracts in American society. The Marshall Court, over the span of a mere three decades, managed to influence the life of every American citizen even to this day by impacting the development of the judicial branch, establishing a boundary between the state and national government, and making declarations on the sanctity of contracts ("The Marshall Court"...
Before the adoption of the United States Constitution, the U.S. was governed by the Articles of Confederation. These articles stated that almost every function of the government was chartered by the legislature known as Congress. There was no distinction between legislative or executive powers. This was a major shortcoming in how the United States was governed as many leaders became dissatisfied with how the government was structured by the Articles of Confederation. They felt that the government was too weak to effectively deal with the upcoming challenges. In 1787, an agreement was made by delegates at the Constitutional Convention that a national judiciary needed to be established. This agreement became known as The Constitution of the United States, which explicitly granted certain powers to each of the three branches of the federal government, while reserving other powers exclusively to the states or to the people as individuals. It is, in its own words, “the supreme Law of the Land” (Shmoop Editorial Team).
The U.S. district courts are the case courts of the federal court system. “Federal district courts have original jurisdiction over all cases involving alleged violations of federal statutes.” A community can be branched into segments, and it can have many places where the court trials different cases. “U.S. district courts handle tens of thousands of cases per year (Schmalleger).”
The first congress understood that case would be different so that there needed to be a three tier system. Where if the plaintiff was not in favor of the district court decision then they can it appeal to the circuit court and so on so forth. This established the last tier and delegated the remaining court which was the Supreme
The US court system consists of a trial court, an appellate court, and a supreme or high court. The trial court is the first to hear the facts of a case and has original jurisdiction. The appellate court hears cases whose resolution is disputed by the losing party in the trial court. The supreme or high court hears cases whose outcome is disputed by the losing party in the appellate court. The supreme or high court chooses which cases warrant a hearing. The federal and the state court system have the same basic structure. Each consists of a trial court, an appellate court, and a supreme or high court. The Federal Court of Appeals has thirteen (13) circuits which cover most states except the District of Columbia. The federal system also has specialty courts such as the Court of Federal Claims and the United States Tax Court.
In transition, the Supreme Court of the United States has acquired a number of powers over the years. However, one power, in particular, is of great magnitude, judicial review. Judicial review is the judicial branch’s power to assess the legality of the actions of the legislative and executive branches of government, as well as the states.4 Accordingly, the federal judiciary determines the validity of such actions set by the Constitution of the United States. In brief, judicial review allows the court to determine whether or not legislation that is passed within government follows the guidelines of the United States Constitution. With this in mind, Judicial review proves to serve as an example of the separation of powers in the United States government.
The Supreme Court and Federal court have the same authority as in the Constitution. This system is called checks and balances which prevents the sole power of any one of the three branches. In addition, this power can be divided between the states and Federal government. The Federal government’s role in “domestic and foreign affairs and how they have grown” (Fe...
Trial courts, or district courts, the Appellate, or the circuit courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) which is the only court created from the constitution (Krutz, 498). The second part of this part was Judicial Review. The Judicial Branch of our government has a crucial part in making sure the other two branches, Legislative and Executive, both constitutionally follow their powers. Many of the instances, where their intentions are put into question, are through court cases (Krutz, 508). One of the main ones we discussed considering this subject matter was Murbury v. Madison during the election of 1800. While still in office, during his lame duck period, Adams knew he would lose his control of Congress, so he began to appoint judges, known as the "midnight appointed." However, one of those many he had appointed, and the Senate confirmed, William Murbury, did not get his commission. So, he began to start the journey to sue James Madison, Jefferson's Secretary of State, who was responsible for delivering the official piece of paper. Murbury tried to use a precedent to go straight to the SCOTUS; however, there are only two times when the Supreme Court will have original jurisdiction. That is only when the cases deal with foreign ambassadors and cases that have a state as a party (Krutz,
The significant impact Robert Dahl’s article, “Decision-Making in a Democracy: the Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker” created for our thought on the Supreme Court it that it thoroughly paved the way towards exemplifying the relationship between public opinion and the United States Supreme Court. Dahl significantly was able to provide linkages between the Supreme Court and the environment that surrounds it in order for others to better understand the fundamental aspects that link the two together and explore possible reasoning and potential outcomes of the Court.