Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Herman Melville’s “Bartleby, the Scrivener,
Herman Melville’s “Bartleby, the Scrivener,
Herman Melville’s “Bartleby, the Scrivener,
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Herman Melville’s “Bartleby, the Scrivener,
The Struggle for Power and Control between Bartleby and the Lawyer In Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall-Street “Imprimis: I am a man who, from his youth upwards, has been filled with a profound conviction that the easiest way of life is best”- Melville Melville intends something less black and white with more gray shading. Melville uses dramatic irony and grim humor in “Bartleby, the Scrivener: A Story of Wall Street. This is to show the reader how the Lawyer assumes he is a safe, successful and powerful man with extensive control in his polite society until he hires a man named Bartleby. This relationship is slowly revealed to be quite a conundrum for the Lawyer and the reader. Melville shows how the Lawyer never had any power or control over Bartleby but quite the opposite; Bartleby held all the power and control in this relationship. I will explore the important of the power struggle and the fight to maintain control between the Lawyer and Bartleby. The Lawyer assumes he has all the power when he is dealing with Bartleby. He states “he is an elderly man” (http://www.bartleby.com/129, p. 1) and has practiced law for thirty years. The Lawyer assumes that his age and experiences make him a better judge of what is right or wrong with the people he employs. The Lawyer also worked for a prominent member of his community, John Jacob Astor, and would like to think he is on a similar level as his idol. So, if a reader had any question of his qualifications this should suffice. The Lawyer exerts his power over his employees like Turkey, an employee he gives a coat not because Turkey needed a coat but because the Lawyer believes he should be more presentable if Turkey is working for him. Turkey di... ... middle of paper ... ...ployer, and then he will be rudely treated, and perhaps driven forth miserably to starve”(p.8) Bartleby doesn’t want to be saved; Bartleby desires not to conform to the etiquette that the Lawyers society places upon him. Bartleby wins in the end because he goes to his death holding on to his convictions. Bartleby controlled the relationship to the end of it and beyond. We as human beings assume we have our lives under control and we can exert some power over the situations in our lives. The Lawyer believed in a natural assumption of having the power and control over what he considered a lower less sophisticated class of humanity hence his employees in this story. Bartleby created a situation for the Lawyer he has never experienced before. The Lawyer learns in the end after Bartleby’s death that his rules of society may not be right for all of humanity.
People one can never really tell how person is feeling or what their situation is behind closed doors or behind the façade of the life they lead. Two masterly crafted literary works present readers with characters that have two similar but very different stories that end in the same result. In Herman Melville’s story “Bartleby the Scrivener” readers are presented with Bartleby, an interesting and minimally deep character. In comparison to Gail Godwin’s work, “A Sorrowful Woman” we are presented with a nameless woman with a similar physiological state as Bartleby whom expresses her feelings of dissatisfaction of her life. Here, a deeper examination of these characters their situations and their ultimate fate will be pursued and delved into for a deeper understanding of the choice death for these characters.
Melville’s use of verbal irony allows for a deeper understanding of Bartleby’s character. Bartleby states that he would rather be assigned a position that is not as confined as a clerk; however, in reality, his behavior indicates that he prefers to be isolated. The narrator cannot understand why Bartleby expresses a disliking for confinement when he keeps to himself the majority of his time. As he
The author of the story presents the questions of what is valuable in society and how those that resist these values are dealt with and answers them through Bartleby's actions from his life to his death. Society values things such as money and working to make money where human things such as sentimentalities and emotions are not worth holding onto and when one refuses to work he is left with choices of imprisonment in a cell or imprisonment in a job where Bartleby instead chose to die, to be free of such a world that does not value freedoms and humanity.
Bartleby expresses the passion of not wanting to complete a duty by stating, "I prefer not to"(Melville 155.) This conveys the obviousness of Bartleby's utter rudeness, while, he still remains respectful to his fellow employees and employer. This repetitive statement encourages the reader to pursue an investigation of why Bartleby refuses to complete duties assigned to him; thus, the reader must read on, to break their confusion. It also indicates that Bartleby has no ambition: The narrator, Bartleby's employer, constantly request Bartleby to complete an assignment, Bartleby declines with his favorite statement, "I prefer not to," each time the narrator requests Bartleby to complete a task (Melville 155.) One can infer that Bartleby is unconcerned with his job and the requests made of him are of less concern. Instead, Bartleby is simply there to be present and nothing more. Bartleby no longer completes duties and sits in his excluded office area, by himself, all day, staring out of a dirty window. If one is interested in his job, they will complete the jobs required task diligently, to prov...
The lawyer, on the other hand, does view his demands as intrinsically valid. The lawyer represents society with all its requirements and demands. Society expects us to work for our living under the terms and conditions that it sets, but what if we choose not to? * The lawyer does not make much of Bartleby's choice of words, he does not recognize the real problem; namely, Bartleby is neither interested, nor subjected to the rules of society
The most significant aspect touched upon in the both essays is isolation, but they differ in how each character deals with the issue. The isolation of the main character In Bartleby is revealed in his refusal to fulfill the routine work. Bartleby’s stated response to his employer’s request to do work was usually, “I prefer not to” (Melville, p302) Time and time again, Bartleby uttered those words without repercussion. His employer seemed unable to do anything. “But there was something about Bartleby that not only strangely disarmed me, but in a wonderful manner, touched and disconcerted me. I began to reason with him”. (Melville, p 303) Bartleby chose at every turn to seclude himself from society and life in general. Throughout the essay, we see first, Bartleby's unwavering preoccupation with his employment, followed by his decision ...
...ience with Bartleby. It is doubtful that the lawyer at the beginning of the story, as he pictured himself, could have imagined such personal tragedies. Here we see the denouement. The culmination of the change that Bartleby has affected in the lawyer.
...n himself and the lawyer, a fact that the lawyer is oblivious to. In spite of his late efforts to resurrect Bartleby, so to speak – to mend the suffering and break down the self-created walls that exist between himself and the scrivener (and all of humankind, for that matter) – Bartleby’s demise is inevitable. The lawyer has already proven his inability to communicate with anything human, and when he wants a chance to rectify the situation, it is too late. Look at, then, his final words on the subject: "Ah Bartleby! Ah humanity!" (2427) Here the lawyer condemns the irony of the dehumanized society that he himself is not only a part of, but, early on in the story, admittedly searching for. After all, it was he who so cherished Bartleby’s machine-like functions, and he who now fails to realize the tragedy of the situation, despite his seemingly profound exclamation.
The story of Bartleby was a very interesting story open for many different interpretations. Melville does and excellent job building suspension towards different thoughts as to what caused Bartleby to become an emotionless incapable worker. Here is evidence throughout the story to reflect the kindheartedness of the narrator. After reading this work the last quote “Ah Bartleby, Ah humanity” stood out as a cry of sadness for failing to understand and further assist Bartleby. After the numerous attempts He describes himself an elder lawyer that has his own office with a total of four employees including Bartleby. The narrator takes the time to learn the qualities of each individual not just on a performance basis however, personally as well.
Another interesting characteristic of Bartleby is his living habits, which we find out about later in the story. He apparently lives at the office (originally unbeknownst to the narrator). He sleeps, washes, and works in the same place. What makes this even more interesting is that he refuses (or states that he would “prefer not”) to change his living arrangements. When the narrator moves his business, and Bartleby refuses to vacate the premises after the new tenant arrives, the narrator is taken to be responsible for Bartleby, simply because he is the only person who is even close to knowing him. After a lengthy process that ends with Bartleby in prison, who seemingly regards the narrator as the reason for his being there, the story quickly closes with the demise and death of Bartleby, and the strange introduction of the “grub man” (who seems as though he has some deeper importance in the story which I cannot place).
The narrator also separates Bartleby into confinement. "Still further to a satisfactory arrangement, I procured a high green folding screen, which might entirely isolate Bartleby from my sight, though not remove him from my voice" (118). The reader can see that the narrator likes to have a set way of doing tasks through his actions and interactions with the other characters. The narrator is obviously not one whose demands are often ignored. He does not quite seem to know how to react when Bartleby "prefers" not to comply with the narrator’s wishes. "I staggered to my desk, and sat there in a deep study… Was there any other thing in which I could procure myself to be ignominiously repulsed by this lean, penniless wight? – my hired clerk?" (122). Another one of the narrator’s qualities is being pompous. He seems to have an overblown image of himself and puts himself above others.
One man against the majority population is never a fair match, which brings into question the future of Bartleby. Once before we have questioned the Lawyers actions in the basis of moral and ethical values. The lawyer being the mayor leader in this “story world” that Melville has created, has the final say in Bartleby’s faith. John Matteson in his journal discusses this same issue and explains Bartleby’s faith with the following analysis:
Also bartleby makes countless mistakes by not obeying his boss not doing his job. He repeatedly replies “I would prefer not to” which angers the layer. Bartley also refuses to leave the office after the layer has moved out this is another mistake that leads to his imprisonment. In prison he makes the clear mistake of starving himself. He also allows himself to be cut off by all human contact. Bartleby must have had a significant past that led him to the conclusion of death. He also allows himself to be tormented by the other
His efforts though are fruitless because he was not able to get to Bartleby and never truly understood him, even in prison as the man eventually dies of starvation. Although after his death the lawyer does learn of Bartleby’s previous and listless job at a ‘Dead Letter Office’ which made the lawyer sympathize for him and wonder if that job is what made Bartleby so distant. Bartleby was a loner who distanced himself from everyone, even in death, he was aloof and never interacted with anyone which is not considered normal human behavior because humans are supposed to be social. This story went a little deeper and gave the idea of humanity as a whole being apathetic towards each other, because only the lawyer showed any sort of humane concern for Bartleby while the others cared less. Bartleby himself displayed apathetic behavior as he showed little to no care for how his behavior affected others or even himself. Outside in the world, many people who are stressed out and constantly working tend to only focus on themselves and have little to no care for other people most of the time. It’s another negative view on humanity, but at the same time it’s not that wrong, as society made by humans also makes others so busy and stuck in tedious schedules that they gradually become more jaded and some even become distant and
Bartleby who is part of the name of the story is not even considered the “chief character” of the story, but the lawyer (Melville 1484). The narrator repeatedly references different sources such as Cicero, “his biblical evocations” as well as Trinity Church, “his pride of association with John Jacob Astor” (Dilworth 49). He uses them as ways to explain what he did which may interpret “the guilt the lawyer feels”, if that is what he really feels (Dilworth 50). He may or may not feel guilt, but his actions clearly show his selfishness. The lawyer helps Bartleby because he feels pity, he helps him to feel better and to fulfill his self-interest to go to heaven. He was “predestinated from eternity” and Bartleby was his test (Melville 1502). That must clearly be the reason why the “chief character” of the story tries to help Bartleby. He is a business man seeking profit, he may know he ...