Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The relationship between the UK and the EU
The relationship between the UK and the EU
The relationship between Britain and the EU
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The relationship between the UK and the EU
The State of US-EU Relations
Good Morning Ladies and Gentlemen,
It is my pleasure to speak to you today on the unfortunately precarious state of affairs between the United States and Europe. As you all know, hegemonic power has shifted between European nations for centuries, while the United States did not emerge as such an influential entity until after World War II. Since these post-war reconstructive years, the United States has continued to grow in social, economic, political, and diplomatic strength, thus cementing its role as a major international power. Although Europe came out of the war battered and bruised, it rose up out of the ashes, and surpassed its former glory to start yet another chapter in its historical saga. After Europe got back on its feet, the European Union was created, which is undoubtedly a major modern success story. The US and the EU have achieved high levels of development and stability that have led them to take on both regional and global leadership roles. Representatives from both bodies work side by side in the creation and implementation of policy in organizations such as the UN and the OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development).
Unfortunately, this rosy picture of harmonious relations is more than a little bit idealistic. To say that there have not been times of tension and strife between the US and the EU would obviously be incorrect. Even to say, that the days of friction and discord are over would be a fallacy, because certain issues continue to put a strain on US-EU relations. In order to detail the “why” for the current state of US-EU relations, I will first talk about how past and present conflicts and failures of policy have been caused by fundamenta...
... middle of paper ...
...lliance has been a critical component of the international system for the past five decade… [but] the transatlantic relationship is now under serious strain…Cooperation across the Atlantic will remain critical for addressing the regional and increasingly global challenges likely to be central in the twenty-first century…Despite the forces pushing apart the two sides of the Atlantic, the United States and Europe still have compatible interests and complementary capabilities…[and] virtually every objective that Americans and Europeans seek will be easier to attain if they work together…”15
Thank you very much for allowing me to speak today on the Atlantic Rift and the State of US-EU Relations. I hope to see you all again, as the United States and the European Union work through their differences, and continue to come together at the global bargaining table.
Hook and Spanier describes the current relationship of U.S. with other countries as "ambivalent" and "erratic" with a "love-hate relationship with the world (p.20)". The authors also claimed that the Cold War and other pertinent historical events forward pertinent impacts to the current foreign policy scene.
Without understanding the importance of foreign relations the American people’s way of life could be at stake. Not only could the economic strength of the U.S. diminish, but the military might of the U.S. could also be compromised. Mead argues that without the centrality of foreign policy being evident in American politics the happiness of the world is at risk. “Since the United States has become the central power in a worldwide system of finance, communications, and trade, it is not only the American people whose happiness and security will be greatly affected by the quality of American foreign policy in coming years (Mead 176). I contend that without a strong emphasis on foreign policy, we could begin to see the end of American
...he basic concepts that should be the foundations of foreign policy. America's position in the world evolved from being a world power that was unconcerned about international security in 1900 to 1950 when America was still a world power, but Americans had to contend with the fear of annihilation by the Soviet Union. Williams states that the ultimate "tragedy of American diplomacy" was the failure of the Open Door Policy. This failure, according to the author, resulted not from its misapplication or inherent weaknesses, but rather its successes. This culminated into the Cold War, as Truman demanded resumption of the Open Door Policy without providing economic assistance to the Soviet Union. These perspectives have relevance in the contemporary international environment and could be utilized in an examination of American involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq.
One of the ends that is used in speech is “Peaceful and Secure Europe”. This is a very ambitious end and you have to allocate a lot of both ways and means to accomplish that. On the other hand you can always argue about what peaceful and secure means. In this case however I have to relate it to the current
World War II not only highlighted the tension between the USSR and the USA but also left Europe’s economy and land in a devastated state. (Source C). Europe required a
McCormick, John, and Jonathan Olsen. The European Union: Politics and Policies. Boulder, CO: Westview, 2014. Print.
This dismantles Friedman’s view of the United States using NATO to spread western influence in a noninvasive way to gain control of more parts of the world. Although not allies nor enemies, it shows that countries are willing to come together to create balance not for one country but for the world regardless of their agendas. Friedman fights that delocalization is a failure of the
When World War II ended the final remnants of the old European order lay in ruins. With such devastation wrought upon the continent twice in less than fifty years, it was remarkable that Europe managed to recover. What is even more remarkable is the Phoenix that rose from these ashes, and the new feelings of unity that accompanied the ending of the war. Those nations of western Europe began to do what decades ago had been unthinkable: develop the blueprints for a common system of the United Europe.
Schlesinger portrays the US as ideological warriors defending the American values of freedom and democracy. The passage portrays an America opposed to spheres of influence approach and instead favouring universalism whereby every nation shares common interests. Schlesinger highlights how the US distanced itself from the UK when Churchill went ahead with sphere of influence agreements highlighting its opposition to such measures. The article strongly contrasts to Williams, as the source rejects any imperialist role by the US. The article does not acknowledge the creation of any economic sphere of influence and states that “the US must not permit Britain and Russia to revert to these bad old ways [spheres of influence].” The source depicts the
...area, it is nigh impossible to completely avoid conflict. However, as the years have passed on, Europe has become far less varied in its ideologies, and now consists of constitutional republics. Though once extremely divided, Europe has grown closer as one as time has gone by.
Europe will not run the 21st century because of a combination of economic, institutional, and cultural factors. However, for the purpose of this paper, I will focus on the economic aspects of European society that will impede EU ascendency. I do not believe that the EU will cease to exist in the coming century, but I do believe it will become obsolete because it will be unable to make the necessary changes to their demographic problems, defense policies, and economic culture in response to the increasing American ascendency. Europe has long been known as the continent home to the great powers of the world. From Caesar to Napoleon to the British Empire, the European empires have continuously been at the helm of the ship of progress. The wars of the 20th century however, left Europe in a wake of destruction and chaos period before. The continent was devastated and had little hope to recover. In this new era of European descent, the great American Era came into existence. The US, one of the remaining superpowers, became the helping hand that Europe needed. With the aid allocated by the Marshall Plan and the creation of programs and institutions, Europe had a future. The creation of the European Union (EU) united the European countries over the common goal of preventing war another war. The United States intended for these programs to be a stepping-stone to build the economic and institutional powers of Europe, because a stronger Europe was good for the US. However, instead of using these as a springboard to create self-reliant union, the EU remains reliant on US military and hard power to support them their social efforts.
Over two-hundred years ago, Europe was a vastly different place. To the modern eye, the Europe of the 18th Century would be unrecognizable compared to its current state. However, the road to this new Europe has been not been all kicks and giggles, but a rather rough and tumble journey. Due to the introduction of new ways of thinking, the occurrences of multiple revolutions, changes in government style and leadership, which led to the creation and extinction of numerous countries as well as rearrangement of boundary lines, and the formation of a European Union, Europe today is hardly comparable to the Europe in our history books. The transformation that Europe experienced spanned a period of more than two-hundred years and made it into the more unified 21st Century powerhouse that we know today.
Eurozone crisis can be seen as the most important economic problem of the European Union in the history. Because of that crisis the currency union have faced the possibility of separation which is an extremely critical issue not only economically but also politically. Until the subprime crisis which became prominent by the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008, the economic level of the EU members were similar. When the bankruptcy occurred those countries started to differentiate in a very significant way. Total government debt and also problems of banking sector lead many countries to negative GDP growth, high unemployment rates and more importantly social unrest.
Senior, Nello Susan. "Chapters:4,15." The European Union: Economics, Policies and History. London: McGraw-Hill, 2009. Print.
With the above treaty (new peace-building mandate) now is a particularly good time for the EU to take the lead. Its immediate neighbours are observed in political, economic and social unrest. Those countries in this crucial stage of the history of a solid support. Launching its new and ambitious neighbourhood policy, the EU has shown willingness and have to be an example to lead peacebuilding process (in peace-building - works show more than words).