The State as One Actor Amongst Many

1999 Words8 Pages
The sovereign nature of states is a topic that has come into question towards the end of the last century. Many advancements and changes, both within and outside borders, have brought into some doubt whether the state is indeed as strong an actor within its borders as it once was. By analysing internal and external influences on the governments of the UK and USA in the twentieth century, it is possible to judge how the nature of power has changed. I will argue that a gradual progression of events, in particular marketisation of the economy and growing dependence on supranational bodies such as the EU and the international economy, have clearly reduced the state to an actor that still retains some control, but is struggling for sovereignty against external interference and internal competition. There are two competing schools of thought at work, each with underlying principles and answers to the aforementioned question. Postmodernists agree that the state has become “one actor amongst many”. Postmodernism “depends upon a radical rejection of the past and of all attempts to use the past to understand the present,” and rejects “that history can be interpreted as moving towards a definite goal.” (Gamble, 2000:20-21) Postmodernists also see the decision-making process as pluralistic, spread across departments and organisations with different goals and specialisations, and no one group having absolute power. This means that they see the state as increasingly “hollow”, with recent political changes, due to the delegation of responsibility and use of multiple actors. Late modernity, on the other hand, is the theory that we are still in a state of modernity; that society is developing in a unilinear and purposeful way with clear hierarchy.... ... middle of paper ... ...R.D. (1980). Free to choose. San Diego: Harvest Book. pp. 54–64. Gamble, A. (2000). Politics and fate. Cambridge, UK: Polity. pp. 20-21. Hague, R. & Harrop, M. (2010). Comparative government and politics, eighth edition. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan. p. 80. Hood, C. (1991). ‘A public management for all seasons?’, Public Administration, 69(1). pp. 3–19. Ohmae, K. (1990). The borderless world. London, UK: HarperCollins. pp. 17–20. Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government: how the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. pp. 30¬–34. Schumpeter, J.A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper. pp. 269–283. Smith, M. (2009). Power and the state. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 89–108 Strange, S. (1996). The retreat of the state. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 82–87.
Open Document