The Stanford Prison Experiment: Taking a Deeper Look

801 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: the controversial side of stanford prison experiment

A local newspaper ad reached out for volunteers to participate in a Psychological study, created by Philip G. Zimbardo and his research team, which sounded interesting for many individuals. Was it the best option to follow through with it? Volunteers were given a promise of being paid fifteen dollars a day of the study. Multiple members probably considered this a once in a life time event that could result in quick, easy money. Many may have heard about the Stanford Prison Experiment, but may not have been aware of the scars that it left upon the participants. Taking a deeper look into the study and the impacted outcomes on individuals will be elaborated on (Stanford Prison Experiment). On August 14, 1971, the Stanford Prison Experiment had begun. The volunteers who had replied to the ad in the newspaper just weeks before were arrested for the claims of Armed Robbery and Burglary. The volunteers were unaware of the process of the experiment, let alone what they were getting themselves into. They were in shock about what was happening to them. Once taken into the facility, the experimenters had set up as their own private jail system; the twenty-four volunteered individuals were split up into two different groups (Stanford Prison Experiment). By the flip of a coin, 12 members were assigned to act as prison guards and the other 12 members were assigned to act as the prisoners. According to the source Stanford Prison Experiment it states, “The guards were given no specific training on how to be guards.” The assigned guards were free at will, to do what they believed what needed to be done to keep order within the prison walls. The experiment contained three different types of guards that acted out in the experiment. One-third of... ... middle of paper ... ...of real-life prisons can encounter the same behavior, as the volunteers in just a Psychological study. Many may not know about the scars that were left upon the individuals in this study, but take a look at how a fake study can reenact such a real life experience for most. Works Cited Roller, B. (2008). A Quiet Rage, the Stanford Prison Experiment. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 58(3), 431-434. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/194771933?accountid=9609 Stanford Prison Experiment. (n.d.). The: A Simulation Study of the Psychology of Imprisonment. Retrieved from http://www.prisonexp.org/ Zimbardo, P. G. (2007). Revisiting the Sanford Prison Experiment: A lesson in the power of situation. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 53(30), B6-B7. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/214660796?accountid=9609

Show More
Related

  • The Power of Force: Human Behavior Under Pressure

    1026 Words  | 3 Pages

    In this study Zimbardo chose 21 participants from a pool of 75, all male college students, screened prior for mental illness, and paid $15 per day. He then gave roles. One being a prisoner and the other being a prison guard, there were 3 guards per 8 hour shift, and 9 total prisoners. Shortly after the prisoners were arrested from their homes they were taken to the local police station, booked, processed, given proper prison attire and issued numbers for identification. Before the study, Zimbardo concocted a prison setting in the basement of a Stanford building. It was as authentic as possible to the barred doors and plain white walls. The guards were also given proper guard attire minus guns. Shortly after starting the experiment the guards and prisoners starting naturally assuming their roles, Zimbardo had intended on the experiment lasting a fortnight. Within 36 hours one prisoner had to be released due to erratic behavior. This may have stemmed from the sadistic nature the guards had adopted rather quickly, dehumanizing the prisoners through verbal, physical, and mental abuse. The prisoners also assumed their own roles rather efficiently as well. They started to rat on the other prisoners, told stories to each other about the guards, and placated the orders from the guards. After deindividuaiton occurred from the prisoners it was not long the experiment completely broke down ethically. Zimbardo, who watched through cameras in an observation type room (warden), had to put an end to the experiment long before then he intended

    Read More

  • Comparison Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

    840 Words  | 2 Pages

    Phillip Zimbardo conducted the Stanford experiment where 24 physiologically and physically healthy males were randomly selected where half would be prisoners and the other half prisoner guards. To make the experiments as real as possible, they had the prisoner participants arrested at their homes. The experiment took place in the basement of the Stanford University into a temporary made prison.

    Read More

  • Social Psychology and the Stanford Prison Experiment by Philip Zimbardo

    2259 Words  | 5 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted in 1971 by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University. The purpose of the experiment was a landmark study of the human response to captivity, in particular, to the real world circumstances of prison life. In social psychology, this idea is known as “mundane realism”. Mundane realism refers to the ability to mirror the real world as much as possible, which is just what this study did. Twenty-four subjects were randomly assigned to play the role of "prisoner" or "guard" and they were made to conform to these roles.

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment

    1059 Words  | 3 Pages

    Zimbardo along with Craig Haney, and Curtis Banks placed an advertisement asking for male volunteers. There were twenty four subjects that participated in the experiment that were selected from a pool of seventy five respondents. (Zimbardo, Haney, Banks 1973.) Each of the respondents were asked to complete a very extensive questionnaire including family background, physical and mental health history, and prior involvements in crime. According to the chronicle of higher education Philip Zimbardo stated “First we established that all 24 participants were physically and mentally healthy, with no history of crime or violence, so as to be sure that initially they were all ‘good apples.’ They were paid $15 a day to participate. Each of the student volunteers was randomly assigned to play the role of prisoner or guard in a setting designed to convey a sense of the psychology of imprisonment” (Zimbardo, 2007, pB6-B7.) The subjects were white, Caucasian males with the exception of one Oriental subject, who were all in the Stanford area during the summer. The subjects were also from a middle socioeconomic class and were initially strangers. Dr. Philip Zimbardo also played an active part in the experiment, he was the prison superintendent and his two research assistants Craig Haney and Curtis Banks were wardens. The researchers chose human subjects because this experiment would not work on

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment by Philip Zimbardo

    1885 Words  | 4 Pages

    The ideas of social psychology mentioned above can be applied to the Stanford Prison Experiment; in which the environment, the participants, and construals brought about behaviors that may not have been how the participants actually would behave in real life.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment Review

    1090 Words  | 3 Pages

    Before commencing the study all participants were briefed on the roles pertaining to the experiment without actually being assigned roles. Once roles were determined and assigned each participant was given specific instruction to their roles whether it be the role of the Guard or Prisoner. The group assigned to the prisoner role were greater in number and were instructed to be available at a predetermined time, this was done to maintain the reality of the simulation. The prisoners were arrested and escorted by real-life law enforcement officials and processed as any detainee would be in a real situation. Upon completing the processing part of the experiment the students were then transferred to the simulated prison, which was housed in the basement of the university, and assigned identifying numbers, given demeaning clothing as uniform and placed in barren cells with no personalized

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Stanford Prison Experiment

    1279 Words  | 3 Pages

    Would you go into prison to get paid? Do you believe that you will come out the same or become different? Do not answer that. The Stanford Prison Experiment was an experiment that was conduct in 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. Seventy applicants answered the ad and were narrowed down to 24 college students, which half were assigned either to be guards or prisoners by random selection. Those 24 college students were picked out from the of 70 applicants by taking personality tests and given diagnostic interviews to remove any candidates with psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse. The experiment lasted six days but it was supposed to last two weeks, it was so traumatizing that it was cut short. Zimbardo was the lead researcher and also had a role in pretend prison. Zimbardo’s experiment was based on looking

    Read More

  • The Ethics of the Stanford Prison Experiment

    923 Words  | 2 Pages

    After only six days the Stanford Prison Experiment was stopped, after they originally planned it to last for two weeks. This was not because Zimbardo thought it should be, of the guards out of line behavior, or because outsiders thought so. The experiment finally stopped because of a graduate student was helping Zimbardo told him that it was out of control. I am very surprised from the results of the experiment. The power of situations was shown to be much more powerful than I ever would have thought. Because of the way the prisoners were treated, I do not think there will ever be another experiment like this ever again, even though a lot of valuable information was attained for conducting it.

    Read More

  • The Stanford Prison Experiment Summary

    457 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted in 1971 by psychologist Philip Zimbardo explored the moral impact of becoming a prisoner or prison guard. Zimbardo, a former classmate of Stanley Milgram who conducted his own obedience experiment (The Milgram Obedience Study), looked to expand upon Milgram's research. He sought to further investigate the impact of situational variables on human behavior. The main question the researchers asked was, how the participants would react when placed in a simulated prison environment. The participants that were chosen were undergraduate students who were physically healthy with no history of mental illness or a criminal record. They would be selected to fill either the role of prisoner or prison guard. The main question was “Would those good people,

    Read More

  • Ethical Issues In The Stanford Prison Experiment By Zimbardo

    728 Words  | 2 Pages

    After watching the video on the Stanford Prison Experiment, there are substantial amounts of ethical concerns that are seen with the way this study was conducted from beginning to the very end. The first ethical issue perceived to be one of the leading concern in this experiment which was that this experiment overall was gone too far there wasn’t appropriate control or limitation made to this experiment, I think this was mainly was because of the role Zimbardo played in the experiment being an administrator of the prison as well as the doctor who was conducting the study and cause of this he didn’t know where to stop and end his experiment when it was going too far because he became a part of the study.

    Read More

  • Summary Of A Prison Experiment

    1086 Words  | 3 Pages

    These strict guidelines along with over 10 others helped shape the prison. The guards at the beginning of the experiment formed these guidelines. Their authority, from the start, was absolute. They did not allow prisoners to speak, eat or even use the restroom without permission. Sometimes, unimaginably, the inmates were not granted permission. Day one of the experiment was full of confusion and learning for everyone involved. The events

    Read More

  • To Kill A Mockingbird Essays: The Stanford Prison Experiment

    70 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Stanford Prison Experiment took place in 1971. Young male students were divided into the roles of Prisoner and Guard and put in a prison-like environment beneath the Psychology Department at Stanford University (lab conditions). The study was meant to last a fortnight. But the ruthless conduct of the prison Guards and the suffering of the Prisoners was so to much that it had to be terminated after six

    Read More

  • The Education of a Torturer

    589 Words  | 2 Pages

    The experiment took ordinary college students and had some agree to be prisoners and the rest would be guards for the prisoners. Both groups received no training on what to do or act like. They had to get all of their knowledge of what to do from outside sources, such as television and movies. The guards were given uniforms and night sticks and told to act like an ordinary guard would. The prisoners were treated like normal criminals. They were finger printed and booked, after that they were told to put on prison uniforms and then they were thrown into the slammer (in this case a simulated cellblock in the basement was used). All of the participants in this experiment at first were thought to be similar in behavior but after one week, all of that changed. The prisoners became "passive, dependent, and helpless." The guards on the other hand were the exact opposite. They became "aggressive and abusive within the prison, insulting and bullying the prisoners."

    Read More

  • Stanford Prison Experiment 1970

    557 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Stanford prison experiment was conducted by Dr. Zimbardo. Two groups of people were paid to be a part of the Stanford Experiment, one group fake prisoners and the other were fake guards. Dr. Zimbardo’s goal for the experiment was to understand the psychological aspects of being a prisoner and a guard with higher authority. The duration of the experiment lasted for six days in total due to the extreme amounts of abuse and sadistic tendencies of the people who pretended to be guards in the experiment. In relation to American history, it was one of the most popular experiments done by Stanford University.

    Read More

  • Social Roles in Society

    724 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Prison Simulation, studied by Haney, Banks & Zimbardo is quite impressive as to how extensive the study actually is. Due to lack of length in this paper the synopsis dealing with this study will be brief. The experiment consisted of 24 voluntary men who were divided into two groups: Guards and Inmates. Both groups were given uniforms to encourage their roles in the prison scenario. The subjects immediately began to take on rolls as to how they thought they should act. The prison had a much greater impact on all persons than could have been anticipated. The study was supposed to last 14 days, but due to extreme emotional depression the study ended after 6 days. In the spring of 1998, my Law a...

    Read More

More about The Stanford Prison Experiment: Taking a Deeper Look

Open Document