The Stamp Act Analysis

724 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Colonial resistance to British rule

My fellow members of Parliament,
I, Charles Cornwall, Member of Parliament, deeply believe that we shall quickly and effectively impose the Stamp Act on the colonies in America. This Stamp Act would help us greatly with our increasing debt from the cost for supplies and men during the war. This Act shall be imposed only because they owe us a great deal for helping their land and economy function, we doubled our national debt in order to fight a war that directly benefitted the Americans, therefore, we are entitled to some money for manufacturing all of their goods they use in everyday life. Do not forget we also give them much thought in Parliament! Britain will quickly rise out of debt and thrive if we impose this small fee on our colonies. …show more content…

When we fought in the war some years back, we were fighting for more land to give to the colonies. They are all very lucky and fortunate that we succeeded in defeating the French imperial ambitions. Because we were fighting for their greater good and because we sacrificed our lives for the better of the colonies, they should have no problem paying us this minuscule fee. The colonists are becoming greedy and entitled to many things because of our soft laws. We must act quickly and reinforce who their leaders are. If we are able to pass this act, we will rebuild quicker and be more glorious than ever. They act awfully selfish for being under rule by another country. A great example of their selfish acts would be the yankee motto of “No taxation without representation”. We represent them with both equality and fairness, making this foolish phrase invalid. They never know their place and argue they are only “virtually” represented in this great council of Parliament. Colonists do not deserve to be directly represented in such an honorable and major place because we all know they are nothing more than short-tempered, angry

Show More
Related

  • No Taxation Without Representation Dbq Analysis

    490 Words  | 1 Pages

    When we hear about the Revolutionary War, one of the most popular phrases to be tied to it is “no taxation without representation,” and was coined from the fact that the colonies were being directly taxed without democratic representation. The fact that the American people did not have representation in Parliament while being taxed was virtually universally disapproved and was an extremely big factor in driving the American people to protect their democratic ideals through war in the years prior to the revolution.

    Read More

  • The British and the American Colonists: Tension Prior to Revolutionary War

    1033 Words  | 3 Pages

    When the colonies were being formed, many colonists came from England to escape the restrictions placed upon them by the crown. Britain had laws for regulating trade and collecting taxes, but they were generally not enforced. The colonists had gotten used to being able to govern themselves. However, Britain sooned changed it’s colonial policy because of the piling debt due to four wars the British got into with the French and the Spanish. The most notable of these, the French and Indian War (or the Seven Years’ War), had immediate effects on the relationship between the colonies and Great Britain, leading to the concept of no taxation without representation becoming the motivating force for the American revolutionary movement and a great symbol for democracy amongst the colonies, as Britain tried to tighten their hold on the colonies through various acts and measures.

    Read More

  • Were the American Colonists Justified in Waging War and Breaking Wway from Britain?

    942 Words  | 2 Pages

    It was said, and is very true, that the British gave a lot to the colonists and we see such helpings as in the French and Indian war. The British gave up a lot of troops and money and numerous others in fighting that war, that the least that the colonist could do is to pay the taxes. Well they do have a good right to say that since they were the contributing factor in the colonists being safe from the French and Indians. The people, in the end should go about daily lives and pay the normal taxes, but you do have to draw the line somewhere. (DCT 1)

    Read More

  • British Contributions to the Development of American Identity Dbq

    1151 Words  | 3 Pages

    One such thing that American colonists united themselves upon was the misrepresentation across the Atlantic. British Parliament consisted of many members from many areas, but not one of those members was able to convey the message from the colonies because there were no such representatives. Many members of Parliament, such as Edmund Burke, led the rest of Britain and Parliament to believe that the colonists were simply tenants in their land and were to abide by the laws of the British constitution. [Doc B] This mere thought unified the colonists and presented a situation that they could not take their eyes off of.

    Read More

  • Unfair Taxation: Catalyst for the American Revolution

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the war the British and the colonies worked side by side though after problems arose and the British wanted to take over the 13 colonies and gain there territory. British parliament in London also wanted to impose new laws and restrictions. This caused the colonists to feel that their freedom was being limited, though that is not the main cause that caused the tension between Britain and the colonies it was the series of unfair taxes that the British forced the consists to pay. There is many though the ones that are most important are the stamp act that began the protests, the Boston massacre which lead to the Boston tea party and then the intolerable acts, and lastly the first and second continental congress

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Intolerable Acts

    825 Words  | 2 Pages

    To those ready for change, as of mid-1776 our colonies have gone through drastic changes in over the past few years in order to unite and become a sovereign country. Following the Sons of Liberty’s Boston Tea Party incident, British Parliament passed a series of unacceptable laws, known as the Intolerable Acts, which clearly violated our human rights. The Boston harbor was shut down, a British Governor was appointed to Massachusetts, British soldiers are now being quartered in colonists’ homes, and a series of tax laws were placed on items which were previously essential to colonists. To top it off, this has taken place without the colonial men and women’s voice being represented overseas in Parliament. The Provincial Congress has been put together to vote on how to resolve the Intolerable Acts.

    Read More

  • Analysis of Patrick Henry's Speech to the Virginia Convention

    844 Words  | 2 Pages

    “Give me liberty or give me death!” This statement from Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention,” delivered to the House of Burgesses, has been quoted by many, becoming almost cliché. However, the declaration is truly understood by a select few. The unjust Stamp Act passed by the British crown in 1765, brought fame and notoriety to Henry as he spoke out against the unjust taxation without representation. Ten years later on the eve of revolution, Henry calls upon the Colonial government of which he is part, to act for the betterment of the people. Patrick Henry attempts to persuade the House of Burgesses to revolt and declare war against Britain by logically convincing them that it is their natural right to be free and calling on their patriotism and pride as leaders of colonial America.

    Read More

  • The Sense of Identity and Unity of the Colonists

    707 Words  | 2 Pages

    After the Great War for Empire, the British parliament began carrying out taxes on the colonists to help pay for the war. It was not long from the war that salutary neglect was brought on the colonies for an amount of time that gave the colonists a sense of independence and identity. A farmer had even wrote once: “Here individuals of all nations are melted into a new race of men, whose labours and posterity will one day cause great changes in the world” (Doc H). They recognized themselves as different than the British, so when parliament began passing bills to tax without representation there was an outcry of mistreatment. Edmund Burke, a man from parliament, sympathized with the colonists: “Govern America as you govern an English town which happens not to be represented in Parl...

    Read More

  • The Quartering Act Essay

    999 Words  | 2 Pages

    The colonists were required to pay for the veterans of a war that left Britain in debt so that British taxes could reduce, but colonial taxes would increase. “They also believed it was unjust to ask them to pay for the expenses of the British soldiers. They had no representatives in Parliament so they believed it was wrong for Parliament to pass any taxes on them. It was an age old principle of English law that taxation without representation was tyrannical.” The injustices brought on the colonists by the British government culminated in this act that required British soldiers to live in the homes of colonists. The colonists felt that the British were making the colonists pay for the debts of England. The resistance created by this led to strengthening colonial unity and the creation of revolutionary

    Read More

  • The Stamp Act of 1765

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the French and Indian War had started in 1763, it was assured that Great Britain was deeply in debt. During this battle, England had occupied much of Eastern American colonies. When the British had taken over the colonies it angered the workers, because many of them thought they had to leave their jobs and work for British side. In addition too, many colonists knew they were going to be taxed. This quote is directly from Benjamin Franklin’s Letter on the Stamp Act in July 01, 1765. “Idleness and pride tax with a heavier hand than kings and parliaments. If we can get rid of the former, we may easily bear the latter” (Franklin). If the colonists can get rid of the British Legislative branch, then they will have the freedom to sell, buy, and trade. However, many colonist believed they could do anything more, but not pay any taxes to the Parliament. Throughout the middle 1700s, many farmers faced this issue and were not able to ...

    Read More

  • Was the taxation of the colonists justified?

    607 Words  | 2 Pages

    One of the many repercussions of the French and Indian war was that Great Britain had accumulated an enormous amount of war debt. The British needed to pay this off and thought it would only be fair if the Colonies repaid the war debt. The settlers in the Colonies were the ones who had caused the war and were the ones who benefited from it the most so the decision to implement taxes on the people of the colonies was completely justified. These taxes not only helped repay the war debt but also protect the Colonies from the deleterious natives who often attacked settlers moving west. The colonists were simply not ready for change because for much of the past the Colonies acted as sovereign nations, each with its own individual rules and taxes. The colonists had grown to love the lack of regulation that England had not placed upon them for many years prior. So much so that when Parliament did enforce new laws the colonists became extremely angry because all of the benefits from the lack of regulation and taxes were soon going to be gone. The purpose of the Colonies was to benefit Great...

    Read More

  • American Revolution: The Journey to Independence

    506 Words  | 2 Pages

    The british passed a law called the stamp act which meant that we had to put a stamp on everything and pay taxes on it. The colonist were not very happy in document 1 Patrick Henry says “we should not be taxed if we do not have say in parliament because it was

    Read More

  • The Boston Tea Party

    1265 Words  | 3 Pages

    The war had been enormously expensive, and the British government’s attempts to impose taxes on colonists to help cover these expenses resulted in chaos. English leaders, were not satisfied with the financial and military help they had received from the colonists during the war. In a desperate attempt to gain control over the colonies as well as the additional revenue to pay off the war debt, Britain began to force taxes on the colonies. Which resulted in The Stamp Act, passed by parliament and signed by the king in March 1765. The Stamp Act created an excise tax on legal documents, custom papers, newspapers, almanacs, college diplomas, playing cards, and even dice. Obviously the colonist resented the Stamp Act and the assumption that parliament could tax them whenever and however they could without their direct representation in parliament. Most colonials believed that taxation without their consent was a violation of their constitutional rights as Englishmen. Which is where the slogan “No Taxation without Representation” comes

    Read More

  • Stamp Act

    624 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the Virginia Stamp Act Resolutions of 1765 the Virginia colonists state their grievances against the newly charged Stamp Act issued by Parliament. Patrick Henry creates a set of resolves against the Stamp Act to deem it formally unconstitutional in the colonist’s eyes. Henrys resolves address the issue of Parliament unjustly taxing the colonists. The five resolves state that the colonists should be treated as fellow Britons in the mother country and they should have the same “liberties, privileges, and immunities.” They are Englishmen and should be treated as such. The Virginia Resolutions to the Stamp Act were crucial in the development of the idea of independence for the American Colonists because it created the principle of no taxation without representation and the understanding that Parliament was running unconstitutionally.

    Read More

  • Atlantic Revolutions

    1803 Words  | 4 Pages

    The American Revolution was marked by the colonies’ independence from Britain. This separation pronounced a new age marked by a decisive political change in the colonies because of the implementation of the Enlightenment ideals and the continuation of English liberties. However, the American Revolution was considered a conservative movement because it “originated from an effort to preserve the existing liberties of the colonies rather than create new ones” (Strayer, 782). Furthermore, the revolution occurred not on the issue of taxation, but on the issue of representation. The colonists believed autonomy was part of their birthright and as Englishmen along with their economic rights and their “natural rights to life, liberty, and property” (Kramnick, Lockean Liberalism). These two sentiments can be seen in their famous slogan “No taxation without representation”. By challenging their economic interests, their established traditions of local autonomy, and their identity as true Englishmen, the colonists were truly infuriated. Thus the American Revolution didn’t grow out of the social tensions within the colonies but rather from an unexpected effort by the British government to tighten its control over the colonies and ex...

    Read More

More about The Stamp Act Analysis

Open Document