The South Was Not Responsible for the Civil War

694 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: slavery in the us its impact in culture

Josh Fox once said, “When you’re cornered, there are two things you can do: move or fight.” It is clear that the Southern states chose to fight rather than to move by seceding. However, it is unclear if the North is responsible for cornering the South and making the South have no choice but to fight. Was the Northern states responsible for cornering the Southern states that chose to fight? The South is responsible for the Civil War to a minuscule extent because the Northern states are responsible for cornering and escalating the difference between the Southern state who had no choice but to fight for their economy and livelihood. Therefore, the Southern states is not responsible for the secession which led to the Civil War. When the cotton gin is invented and the industrial revolution starts in the United States the Southern states had to change their way of living and their economy. They are forced to grow cotton to make money and cotton requires a lot of slaves. This becomes the difference that led to the Civil War. However, the Northern states doesn’t require slaves in their mills and factory which is a clear difference between the South and North that eventually leads to war. The South was greatly dependent toward slaves but the North didn’t have a reason to have slaves. Northern states are responsible for the blame of cornering the South because they disagree with slaves but is immensely dependent toward the South which is greatly dependent toward the slaves to harvest the cotton. It is not an exaggeration to say the North was hypocritical. Northern states were being stubborn and didn’t try to understand why the South wanted or needed the slaves when they used cotton which is harvested from the slaves to develop their econ... ... middle of paper ... ...North caused economical damage to the South. The escalation caused more problems between the two sides. Northern states tried to force their thoughts into the South by developing the Tariff of Abominations to their advantage. Southern states feels abandoned because this tariff because it seems like the federal government is on the Northern states’ side. The South is not responsible for the Civil War while the North is responsible for making differences and the escalation of the difference that leads to the war. The South was cornered or forced to secede and fight for their economy. Northern states are responsible for creating the difference of slaves with the Southern states and escalation of the difference or problem. Garcia, Jesus. Creating America: A History of the United States : Beginnings through World War 1. Evanston, IL: McDougal Littell, 2006. Print.

Show More
Related

  • Political Parties, Sectionalism and the Civil War

    1453 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sectionalism was the underlying cause of the Civil War. The North and South could not agree on anything which caused a lot of animosity between the North and South. The collapsing of the two party system and the rise of sectionalism started the Civil War. Every act and policy can be traced back to sectionalism. The South valued State’s Rights and always tried to use them against the North. The North tended to favor Central Government. The question of slavery was also a good example because neither side could collaborate and find the right answer. From the Tariff of 1832 to the Fugitive Slave Act neither North nor South was pleased at the same time. The Civil War was going to happen no matter what as long a sectionalism was an issue.

    Read More

  • What Caused The Civil War Dbq

    554 Words  | 2 Pages

    When the war began and the union blockaded all their ports the south was out of luck. They had very little industrial workers and manufactured goods compared to the north so during the blockade they could not make their own weapons or food other than corn. (Doc 2) The north had the advantage because they supplied the south with a lot of important items such as cotton-mills and steamships. (Doc 3) They also had better means of transportation. The north had better boats because they had factories equipped to make them and they also had more railroads to transfer weapons and equipment to soldiers. (Doc 1) The north was meant to win from the beginning and even though it took longer than expected they still beat the south and defeated slavery. No one document will tell you that slavery caused the Civil War, but if it had not been for slavery the war would have never

    Read More

  • Compromises between the North and the South

    518 Words  | 2 Pages

    The North had an industrial economy, and the South concentrated on a farming economy. This created many issues over what tariffs should be placed on. The South wanted tariffs to be placed on farming goods such as cotton, tobacco, etc. This contrasted the North because they wanted tariffs to be placed on manufactured goods to benefit the economy of the North. The North created a tariff called the Tariff of Abominations which made purchased goods from Europe more expensive. This angered the South because their main buyer for their exports was Europe, and this resulted in th...

    Read More

  • What Did The North Cause The Civil War Essay

    1129 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are various explanations as to who and what really caused the Civil War. It is even fair to say that sometimes morals stand in the way when deciding who really started the war. Therefore, the facts must be analyzed clearly and in depth. It is true that the north played a major role in the Civil War, however, the south would not release their strict traditional beliefs of slavery. As time progressed, slavery debates pressured the South more and more to stand by their strict beliefs. Fugitive acts, Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Secession all showed how the south used brutal methods to preserve slavery. Therefore, since the popular sovereignty doctrine, the pro-slavery souths’ strict use of slavery and decisions to secede from the nation, angered the north, leading to a civil war.

    Read More

  • US Sectionalism

    938 Words  | 2 Pages

    From colonial times there were differences in geography that gave rise to variations in culture and economy in the United States. Due to the differing characteristics, a sectional economy molded the United States into two distinct regions: the north and the south. The north, a commercial society, which supported industry and commerce while the south, an agrarian civilization, flourished in the production of raw materials with use of slaves. The two economies were both self-supporting and capable to create a stronger, more productive nation. The regional differences sought to build America, in turn threatened to destroy it. Many Historians believe that the Civil War was constructed over the issue of slavery. However, the concerns of states' rights versus federal rights and the unfair legislation representation were the principal causes of the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Slavery: The Primary Cause Of The Civil War

    710 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Civil War was technically caused by the secession of the Southern States, but the secession was primarily about slavery. One can infer, then, that the Civil War was indirectly, but primarily, caused by Slavery. It is important to note that just because Slavery was the primary cause of the civil war does not mean that the war was only about slavery. The war was fought for a plethora of different reasons that surrounded the creation of a new and independent nation. These reasons include states’ rights (rights to maintain and spread slavery for the most part, however a state’s right to secede appeared to be heavily contested as well), the power of federal government (something the south wanted to weaken in order to maintain slavery), and economic and cultural differences, which had the south relying more heavily on slaves to work at plantations. While these reasons

    Read More

  • The Breakup of the Union

    841 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the years paving the way to the Civil War, both north and south were disagreeable with one another, creating the three “triggering” reasons for the war: the fanaticism on the slavery issue, the Kansas-Nebraska Act, and the separation of the Democratic Party. North being against the bondage of individuals and the South being for it, there was no real way to evade the clash. For the south slavery was a form of obtaining a living, without subjugation the economy might drop majorly if not disappear. In the North there were significant ethical issues with the issue of subjugation. Amazing measures to keep and dispose of subjugation were taken and there was never a genuine adjusted center for bargain. Despite the fact that there were a lot of seemingly insignificant issues, the fundamental thing that divided these two states was bondage and the flexibilities for it or against. With these significant extremes, for example, John Brown and Uncle Tom's Cabin, the south felt disdain towards the danger the Northerners were holding against their alleged flexibilities. The more hatred the South advanced, the more combative they were to anything the Northerners did. Northerners were irritated and it parted Democrats over the issue of bondage and made another Republican gathering, which included: Whigs, Free Soilers, Know Nothings and previous Democrats and brought about a split of segments and abbreviated the street to common war. Southerners loathed the insubordination of the north and started to address how they could stay with the Union.

    Read More

  • Differences Between the North and South that Led to the Civil War

    1460 Words  | 3 Pages

    Yes, slavery was the cause of the Civil War, half of the country thought it was wrong, and the other half just could not let it go or continue. The war was fought overall in different places, and the monetary and property loss cannot be calculated. Arguments about the causes and consequences of the Civil War, as well as the reasons for Northern victory, will continue as long as there are historians to wield the pen ? which is, perhaps even for this bloody conflict, mightier than the sword (Oates 388). The Civil War was a great waste in terms of human life and possible accomplishment and should be considered shameful. Before its first centennial, tragedy struck a new country and altered it for an eternity. It will never be forgotten, but adversity builds strength and the United States of America is now a much stronger nation (Oates 388).

    Read More

  • The End Of The Antebellum Era

    838 Words  | 2 Pages

    Near the end of the Antebellum Era, tensions and sectionalism increased as the states argued over what was constitutional. The South had later seceded from the United States and had become the Confederacy of America while the North had remained as the Union. The South had fully supported states’ rights while the north had strongly disapproved it. However, westward expansion, southern anger with the abolitionists, and the secession of the South that had destroyed the feeling of unity in the country because of the disagreement over slavery had been the main factors to the cause of the Civil War. Therefore, since slavery was the primary reason for the discontent in the country, it had been the primary cause of the Civil War.

    Read More

  • Who Was To Blame For The Civil War

    886 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Union is to blame for the civil war, particularly the northern states because the federal union’s goal was to not promote conformity, but to permit diversity within the orderly confines of any socialized community (Niven 311). The union could easily be considered a haven for all types of people, not just slaves. From 1830 until 1860, relatively few immigrants settled in the South (Meyers). The Northern states had a different vision of what they wanted America to be and strongly opposed how the South ran things. The southern states thrived off slavery and is mainly how people made a living in that region. Slavery is the cornerstone of a social order that protected individual liberty and equality for the white population in the south (Niven 311). Meaning that the North had way more resources, workers, and support in comparison to the South, so slavery was a way for the Southern states to at least stay relevant in the United States of America. The North’s feelings about how slavery was tearing the country and the union apart was the spark for the Civil War.

    Read More

  • The Beginning of Something Terrible

    824 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Civil War was known as The war between the States, because it put father against son, brother against brother, friend against friend and even slave against slave. The Civil War was the deadliest war that was ever fought on American soil. About 620,000 soldiers were killed, millions more were injured and in the south the population went down by a ton. The War ended in Confederate surrender in 1865. The war wasn’t only just about slavery it was also about economics. In the mid 19th century there was trouble brewing between the north and the south over farms, the farms in the north were smaller then the huge slave driven plantations in the south. The number of abolitionist in the north was expanding at a rapid rate. Whenever slavery went into a more western state the north fought it hard. The growing number of abolitionists and the fight over westward expansion of slavery led the south to be worried that slavery was close to being outlawed, which would destroy the South’s way of life. When the Kansas-Nebraska act was passed in 1854 it allowed the territories that America was gaining to become slave states. ...

    Read More

  • Civil War: Inevitable or Avoidable

    1841 Words  | 4 Pages

    ... Those states, seven total, respond by separating from the nation and creating the Confederate States of America. The Confederates then became the one that “make” the war. President Lincoln was not the sole motivation for the war. The long and continuous conflicting views on slavery between the North and South grouped with the political power struggles over the new western territories was only further fueled with their economical and social differences. To state that the Civil War was avoidable would be just be a plain lie. The war meant to take place and it did.

    Read More

  • Why Slavery Prospered in the South but not in the North

    1172 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Northerners were extremely aggravated with the Southerners’ position on slavery. Not only did they disagree that the Southerners did not have to pay the people who worked for them, but they also violated the African Americans’ human rights. People in the North didn’t rely on slavery. They were independent and their work force did not require outside labor. Two main occupations in the North included working in factories and mills. The Northerners were able to do these jobs themselves. If there had been more agricultural jobs...

    Read More

  • Why The North Won the Civil War

    1524 Words  | 4 Pages

    The North was just simply better at maintaining the two most important elements to win a war: men and weapons. They did not have better tactics or leadership, they just had more men. Therefore, the North won the American Civil War due to their possession of greater manpower and resources although the South maintained more stable and efficient military leaders and strategies.

    Read More

  • The Cotton Gin

    740 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...hat Britain didn’t need as much cotton from the south. The problem was that the South only had two markets that bought cotton from them, the North and Britain. Since Britain didn’t need that much cotton at all, the South’s only buyer was the North. So they were depending on the North to buy their goods. The North took advantage of this, since the South had no other way of making a substantial amount of money besides cotton farming. The North decided that they could haggle the price of cotton down low. This made the south very very mad. This and combined with the slave issue eventually led to the Civil War.

    Read More

More about The South Was Not Responsible for the Civil War

Open Document