The Socio-Economic Integration Of Migration

Integration
The integration of migrants is multidimensional process, and because it is a process of social change, it is difficult to clearly define. The term is often confused with terms such as incorporation, inclusion, adaptation, acculturation and adaptation, and sometimes assimilation. These variations can hardly replace the term integration, meaning of which is always associated with the ideal vision of the (national) society seen as a distinct whole. This meaning also implies the historical, political and social processes associated with the formation of the nation-state and the national self-understanding which affect the perception of immigrants, including the possibility of integrating them. (Givens and Luedtke, 145-147)
Integration

The key question is whether migrant workers and members of their families have equal rights and equal opportunities in the labor market as the domestic workers? Do they have guaranteed access to all the social rights and benefits such as the right to work, healthcare, education and housing?
The cultural dimension is concerned with the cultural and religious rights of immigrants, and particularly their perception and practice of diversity (in the cultural, ethnic and religious terms) in the society of the host country which can more or less accepting of cultural and religious diversity of migrant groups and accordingly to that creating its own policies regarding this area.
Although there are efforts to, as much as possible, equalize and standardize to the rights of immigrants and their position in the European Union there are still considerable differences in the formulation of the integration framework and policy making between different Member States. These differences are most often based on three historical archetypes (ethnicity, political community or immigration) by which one's belonging to the state-nation is

At the state level often a very fragmented framework of policies aimed at integration / inclusion of immigrants into society are made and the dynamics of their adoption and implementation are uneven. Although the successful inclusion of migrants in the host society is a result of interactions between institutional structures and the migrants themselves, it seems that the outcome of the integration process, still largely depends on the institutional structure and the relationship of members of the host society towards the immigrants than the other way around. In a modern pluralistic societies the integration of immigrants is not based on common values shared by all members of society, but rather implies the adoption of a "common orientation" defined in Western democracies as liberal civil rights. In making the integration framework key questions are: to what extent are integration policies open to the society of diversity? To what extent and how the right to be different is aligned with the required level of social cohesion? How different political and social actors perceive immigrants as well as they see the phenomenon of immigration as a whole? The answers to these questions will influence the adoption of specific integration policies and appropriate measures are needed if we are to implement them