The Social Democratic Party: The Green Party Of Germany

369 Words1 Page
bulb-icon

Recommended: Green party

The Green Party of Germany is a peace movement that has been here a while. It has worked In the parliament for 30 years helping with the protection of the environment and sustainable Development. The party has also worked on social justice, peace, and human rights. The Green Party played a big role in establishing Germany as a well trusted partner for development and Peace. The party formed the Federal Government and the Social Democratic Party for about two terms. There was a lot of positive things that came with the party, but of course some negative with it. The party was torn by disagreements from the Realist and the Fundamentalist. The realist favored compromise and saw it as a positive and helpful thing. The Fundamentalist Discouraged

Show More
Related

  • The Changing Political fortunes of the Nazi Party

    1529 Words  | 4 Pages

    "Account for the changing political fortunes of the Nazi Party from November, 1923 until January, 1933."

    Read More

  • Analysis of Shaara´s Killer Angels

    1185 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...neration of politicians that were too dedicated to their own cause and system of beliefs.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of President Roosevelt V. Roosevelt

    1609 Words  | 4 Pages

    He decided to break his promise of not running for a third term of being president so Taft couldn’t spend another term in office. When he realized that he wouldn’t be able to win the Republican Party candidate, he decided to break away and create his own party called the Bull Moose Party because Roosevelt felt as strong as a bull moose. The platform of the Bull Moose party was described as “new nationalism”. The platform consisted of “a minimum wage for women; an eight-hour workday; a social security system; a national health service; a federal securities commission; and direct election of U.S. senators” (Miller Center, sec. 4.

    Read More

  • The Day The 60's Died Analysis

    1788 Words  | 4 Pages

    Roosevelt was the Democratic president from 1933 through 1945. During this time there were two wings of the Democrat party. The first wing were the southern, native-born, white, rural Protestants. The second wing were the northern, immigrant, urban, Catholics. Even though the Democrat party was divided, both sides were united than ever under Roosevelt. The Republican Party, however, began to believe government was the problem, not the solution.

    Read More

  • The Labour Government and Its Success in Achieving Its Aims in 1924

    842 Words  | 2 Pages

    for the split in 1931. It was also not easy for the labour party when

    Read More

  • Sectionalism And The Breakup Of The U.s

    1030 Words  | 3 Pages

    These parties were the federalists and the republicans. They had very few geographical divisions, and views were mixed on both sides. See the best example of this in the Maysville Road article. There was a dispute over the proposed road, and whether or not it should be built. federal money.

    Read More

  • James Madison Political Party Analysis

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    Political parties can mobilize the nation as a movement for change. Zeal can be too emotional and partisan, but it can be good if used toward republican ideals. Madison believed that the creation of the Jeffersonian-Republican Party was a good thing because it fought for republican ideals. The Federalists, whom he called Anti-republicans, he charged with deserting true republican principles (Reichley 49). Most political societies will have two natural societies, he explained, the haves and the have-nots. The haves supported those who had power and money and would protect their power and money, using power and force, thinking that the have-nots were incapable of governing themselves. The Jeffersonian-Republican Party represented the have-nots, the great body of the people (Reichley 43). Since the party that Madison helped create was representing the majority of the people, it supports his argument in Federalist No. 51 ¨a coalition of a majority of the whole could seldom take place on any other principles than those of justice and the general good.” The majority of people are normally right, so if the majority of people were against the Federalists, then the Jeffersonian-Republicans were filling a republican

    Read More

  • Federalist Vs Democratic-Republicans Essay

    433 Words  | 1 Pages

    As stated above, the party’s doctrine was based on more than three ideologies. The Democratic-Republicans called for extensive radicalism and nationalism. They dreamt about the country made of people with radical views who knew their rights. Their procedures are very democratic, fair, and transparent.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Federalist And Democratic-Republicans

    492 Words  | 1 Pages

    On the flip side, the Democratic-Republicans wanted their agricultural nation because it caused less power for the federal government and more power for the states. In conclusion, the parties were different than similar, but still were similar none the less. The Federalists stood for manufacturing for the nation because with the manufacturing would come wealth and that was the goal with the Federalists. However, the Democratic-Republicans stood for agriculture because they thought that, that would make the nation holier, and Thomas thought that in doing so America would be the chosen people of God. Even though Thomas had a good intentionality, I would side with Hamilton because he thought things through in the long run.

    Read More

  • The Third Reich: The German Worker's Party

    423 Words  | 1 Pages

    Beginning in 1933, the Third Reich was a name coined by Adolf Hitler to label his realm of rein, and the name was commonly used for Nazi propaganda. It was often referred to as the “Thousand Year Reich”, as Hitler wanted for it to last for a thousand years. The Nazi’s were a polotical party, whose beliefs included the need for Germany to expand, and the destroying of the Treaty of Versailles (a document formed after World War I). They also believed in the supremacy of the Aryan race- blonde hair and blue eyes and anti-Semitism. The Nazis wanted the destruction of Communists and Jews. Before Hitler took over as leader in July 1921, the Nazi’s were called the German Worker’s Party (founded in 1919). The purpose of the Third Reich was German hegemony

    Read More

  • Germany's Influence on The United States Education System

    2006 Words  | 5 Pages

    the culture of the German communities was designed to build and maintain the German heritage in the new country

    Read More

  • Differences Between Democrats And Republicans

    753 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...cedence in immigration improvement. The Democrat Party was in agreement with President Obama executive decision on immigration.

    Read More

  • The Nazi Parties: The Nazi Parties

    303 Words  | 1 Pages

    There are over 14 european nations that have banned Nazi parties.This hate group follow a cause that has a very dark history.Neo nazis, skinheads and others nazi parties are still here today committing hate crimes.

    Read More

  • Transition to Democracy: A UK Success Story

    503 Words  | 2 Pages

    and became a threat to the Conservative and Labour Parties. Slowly, more and more smaller parties

    Read More

  • Idealism and Realism

    1783 Words  | 4 Pages

    “In the place where idealism and realism meet, that is where there is the greatest evolutionary tension.” Idealism prioritizes ideals, social reforms and morals, by wanting to benefit not just yourself, but the world around you, believing people are generally good. On the contrary, realism gives priority to national interest and security with emphasis on promoting one’s own power and influence by assuming that people are egocentric by nature. Based on the definitions stated above, idealism and realism are significantly different from each other and their divergence of thought is more apparent when various proponents of each such as Woodrow Wilson, Henry Lodge, Barack Obama and George W. Bush have varied outlooks on comparable issues in politics. Subsequently, an idealist’s reaction to a particular issue would be a lot different than a realist’s response. Therefore, idealism deals with normative ideas and allows for improvements in the progress of not only a single state, but the whole world, however realism solely focuses on the benefits of one’s own nation.

    Read More

More about The Social Democratic Party: The Green Party Of Germany

Open Document