Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Leadership theory influence essay
Leadership styles
Key concepts of situational leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Situational Leadership Model
Situational leadership is interplay between the amounts of direction
that a leader allows in: 1) the amount of directive (task) behavior
and 2) the amount of relationship behavior (supportive behavior). What
this means is that when an individual first begins a new task they
require a lot of direction and managerial guidance. As they learn more
about the task, the amount of direction decreases until they can make
many of the decisions with the manager providing little input. The
situational leadership model developed and refined by Paul Hersey and
Ken Blanchard divides the model into four quadrants. An explanation of
the four segments is below.
Envision starting a new job with many assigned tasks. Fear of the
unknown takes hold and feelings of self-doubt rise. How am I going to
learn all of this? The situational leadership model, if followed by
your new manager, can provide him/her direction to ensure positive
reinforced learning.
The model is described as a four-block diagram with text inside with
an X-axis (bottom) and Y-axis (left) and more text. Below the X-axis
is a rectangular object with arrows pointing to the left with more
text. Does not mean much yet, but wait for a clearer explanation.
The situational leadership model consists of four leadership styles:
1) S1, directing; 2) S2, coaching; 3) S3, supporting; and 4) S4,
delegating. An X-axis and Y-axis provide direction on the type of
behavior used. The X-axis and Y-axis represent directive or supportive
behavior, respectively. The D1, D2, D3, and D4 in the lower
...
... middle of paper ...
...e/she was the dishes after every meal. Motivation
was high and began to decrease.
This is the shift to the supporting quadrant, where the follower is
able to perform but the motivation (willingness) is falling off.
Through the support, encouragement, and praise from the leader
motivation returns upon crossing into the delegating stage. Here we
have the follower fully motivated and able to perform.
In summary, the situational leadership model provides a leader a
shifting process for teaching a follower through their varying
learning phases. As the follower learns a skill and gains the
confidence to perform it alone, the leader reduces the amount of
direction and support provide. Both the leader and the follower
undergo changes during the learning but the adaptability of each will
determine the degree of success.
“Transformational leadership builds on top of transactional leadership and produces levels of follower effort and performance that go beyond what would occur with a transactional approach alone” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 419). Since a transformational leader applauds resourcefulness, I aspire toward this leadership. Although the Fielder contingency model was “the first comprehensive contingency model for leadership” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 392), “Fielder has reconceptualized his original theory” (Robbins & Judge, 2009, p. 395). In Fielder’s original theory decisions were based on context and changed according to the situation (Fischer). Interestingly, his advanced theory, cognitive resource theory, asserts “it’s the level of stress
According to Dr. Karlene Kerfoot, “research tells us that the leadership traits of the person in charge work either as a magnet to attract, retain, and inspire or as a force that repels” (Kerfoot 2006, p. 25) and in support of this statement she makes reference to the fact that many persons go to work for a specific company with enthusiasm and eagerness and ultimately leave disappointed because of the management. “People are generally hungry for personalized leadership that speaks to their hearts”, says Dr.Kerfoot and this type of leadership motivates them to accomplish task and complete projects they deem difficult or impossible (Kerfoot 2006, p. 25)
A situational leader is the one who will use a different leadership style according to the need and specific situation at the moments.
The third type of leadership style is described as situational leadership. Situational leaders assess the environment and the readiness of the employee before assigning a task (Giltinane, 2013, Grimm, 2010). Situational leaders provide direction and support based on the need at the time. Thus if an employee needs more direction than others, situational leader is able to identify the employees need and provide support accordingly. According to Giltinane (2013) situational leaders relationship with their subordinates and provide guidance and direction as needed.
The situational leadership theory states that leaders use different styles and strategies depending on the situation. There are two models that support this theory. The Fiedler’s Contingency Model of Leadership Effectiveness states that an “effective leadership occurs only when there is an ideal match between the leader’s style and the group’s work situation” (pg
Introduction Through identification and ongoing assessment of her leadership style and ability, this leader is able to develop and understand her own strengths and limitations in order to grow and develop into a more effective leader. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of servant leadership, contingency, and path-goal styles of leadership to gain an understanding of current leadership models, identify this author’s style of leadership, and explore why leadership is important to organizations, society, and this author. A Personal Model of Leadership Servant leadership was a term that was first used by Keifner Greenleaf (1970) in his first essay, The Servant as Leader (as cited by Crippen, C., 2005). Greenleaf based his essay on his belief that a servant leader is a servant first, and explained that it would begin with the natural urge to serve and then the leader would make a conscious choice to become a leader, in doing so he makes the choice to ensure that others needs are met first (2005 ). As a servant leader develops he should always keep aware of those who he serves and strive to ensure that they are becoming healthier, wiser, freer, have an increase in autonomy, and become more like servants themselves (2005).
Hoy, W. K., & Tarter, C. J. (2010). A Theory of Leadership: A Situational Approach. Retrieved January 28, 2014, from http://www.waynekhoy.com/pdfs/theory_of_leadership.pdf
ideals of leadership which could apply in a general case. This model emphasizes the fact that most leadership occurs in interpersonal interaction over an exposition to a large crowd. According to Scholl who performed a study at Jr. Labor Research Center, because leadership is constantly being evaluated by organizational members, superiors, and the public, there are always groups involved in the process as opposed to having a “formal leader” take charge (Scholl, 2003, pp. 2). He goes on to state that even though leadership assigns value to the individual role, there is never a point where the leader in that specific role exerts an absolute sphere of influence without competing claims (Scholl, 2003, pp.3). The process of exercising this type of leadership is inclusive and ethical because it gives an agency to everyone who is a part of the organization (Komives, 2007, p.74). Each person is a part of the leadership process because just be being a follower under a leader there is a relationship attached to oneself. This model is not descriptive but rather prescriptive. It tells one how to act and how to effectively lead rather than simply describe a process which can be observed in nature. The components of leadership involved include inclusivity of others views, the empowerment of those involved, being purposeful with one's goal and aligning others with that goal, and being ethical with good morals. As part of this model each component of this model must be part of a process which includes knowing, being, and doing (Komives, 2007, p.76). Knowing, being, and doing is an interrelated process which influences the leaders thinking and behavior. Knowing i...
Sims Jr., H. P., Faraj, S., & Yun, S. (2009). When should a leader be directive or empowering? How to develop your own situational theory of leadership. Business Horizons, 52, 149-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.10.002
To determine managers leadership style, Fiedler developed a test known as the “Least Preferred Coworker Scale” (LPC). The test is not on the person you dislike personally but the person you have the most difficult getting the job done with.
Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) asserts that a leader’s effectiveness is dependent upon the readiness, or ability and willingness, of the leader’s followers to complete a task. This leadership style is an amalgamation of task-oriented and relationship-oriented characteristics that are employed depending upon the situation and the followers involved. According to the SLT, as followers increase in readiness the leader’s style is to adapt accordingly (Kinicki & Kreitner, 2009).
My biggest personal leadership failure occurred earlier this year when I worked at Einstein Bros Bagels at Coffman Union. I stayed there from January until April making and serving bagels to customers. However, I had the morning shift, the busiest period of the day. Long lines would form every time I was there, and sometimes I couldn’t catch up. One day in April, my co-worker, a veteran making bagels, was absent, and someone who didn’t have as much experience replaced her. What followed was a mess. My team chemistry with the replacement was dreadful, and a ton of people had to wait a while for their orders. My manager saw the incident, and after my shift was over, he gave me the option of leaving my job. I accepted, but my self-confidence was in a state that was beyond repair. It was one of the first times that I felt I let others down with my work performance. I learned that I shouldn’t expect to be great at everything and that I should analyze my weaknesses before taking on something challenging.
Contingency theory and situational view. Contingency theory, developed by Fiedler (1967), is similar to situational theory, in that the leader applies various leadership methods; however, the similarities end there. Rather than adapting to situations, the contingency leader adapts least favored-worker concept to draw the disinterested or less skilled worker into the environment (Fiedler, 1967). Contingent reward offers a kind of acknowledgement or feedback that motivates the quality of affiliation between transactional leaders and their followers. The contingent reward style delivers optimistic support by identifying or gratifying a follower when he or she achieves targeted objectives (Bass, 1985; Hater & Bass, 1988).
...adership Practices in Relation to Productivity and Morale." In D. Cartwright and A. Zander, Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd ed. (Elmsford, NY: Row, Paterson, 1960)
The Situational Theories of leadership explain how leadership style must be tailored to the demands of the task and the qualities of subordinates.