The Importance Of Self In Society

1393 Words3 Pages

One of the biggest areas of study in the class looks at the self. There are many situations that cause individuals to act differently. One of the biggest and repetitive is how individuals act in a fraternity house. No matter the gender, everyone acts very different in these houses then they would at church. Mead, Goffman and Hochschild look at the self through different lenses but they conclude that there is a lack of self. Everyday people conform to societies many situation which dictates individual’s actions while continuously stripping them of their own self. Mead starts off talking about the self, which he says it is not an identity but as self-consciousness that is capable of being object and object to one’s self that is possible because …show more content…

The first is physical stigma, like someone in a wheel chair. The second is character stigma, like someone who is dishonest. Finally, the third is tribal stigma, like someone who is born in a different country. These stigmas, for the most part, where not caused by the individual but sadly they must have a good adjustment to normal society. Goffman describes this transition as, “the stigmatized individual is asked to act so as to imply neither that his burden is heavy nor that bearing it has made him different from us” (Goffman 1963: 76). This shows that society has a big impact on how individuals act and if they hid their stigmas. Stigmatized individuals have to silently overcome their stigma or they will forever be branded with it since they do not fit society’s definition of normality. Goffman looks at the lack of self through the expectations of society, while Hochschild looks at how people’s emotions are shaped by …show more content…

Hochschild talks about emotional labor, or when a specific job requires a specific emotion that the worker has to give off. These emotions are regulated by their bosses and not the workers choosing. In Hochschild research, flight attendants have one specific way of acting during a flight. They must be professional no matter what. She can use surface acting, which is just painting a smile on for the interaction, or deep acting, which is changing the way she thinks about the person. At the end, she cannot cannot lose her calm in the air. This shows that she lacks the individuality to control her actions and emotions. Instead a man sitting in a small cubical controls her opinions and emotions because that is what they believe society thinks is professional. Emotional labor is shaped by society and causes a difference between emotions in public and private lives because society expects different emotions. She calls this Transmutation of an emotional system, and describes it as, “I mean to point out a link between a private act, such as attempting to enjoy a party, and a public act, such as summoning up good feeling for a customer” (Hochschild 2002: 302). Clearly, there is a difference between doing something at home and at work. Since at work individuals are not able to choose their emotions, instead they are forced have their managers tell them how to think. The control of emotions

Open Document