The Rule of Law The Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights 1688 were attempts made by
people of the time to enforce the rule of law in Britain. The rule of
law is a set of values or principles that are the cornerstone of our
legal system. These principles are known or readily discoverable and
therefore do not change without notice; are reasonably clear; apply
prospectively, not retroactively; and enforced through public trials
based upon rational procedural rules before arbiters independent of
the state and all others. The purpose of the rule of law is to remove
both the reality of injustice and the sense of injustice, thus
preventing individuals from taking the law into their own hands as
would occur under natural law or anarchy. The rule of law advocates
that no one, not even Kings, politicians, government officials etc…
are above the law.
During the medieval period a transition took place in Britain that
moved the feudal belief that the King was subject to law to the King
being above the law. According to Clarke, the idea of Kings being
above the law was transmitted via Latin Christianity. Thus Catholic
monarchs took advantage of this belief to do as they pleased. In the
13th Century Britain, King John believed strongly in the divine right
of Kings and as such did much against custom eventually leading to his
forced signing of the Magna Carta in 1215AD by his barons. The idea
behind the Magna Carta being that the customary law was written and
agreed to by the King and thus their rights protected from the King's
arbitrariness. The...
... middle of paper ...
... private property against official
interference. At the same time, the remedy of habeas corpus was being
developed. Formal adherence to the law was one of the public values of
18th century Britain, though not all the people gained equally from
it."
Thus the case of Entick v. Carrington set a precedent whereby the rule
of law prevailed except where statute said otherwise.
In conclusion, the rule of law safeguards liberty for citizens against
arbitrary use of power by the government. The Magna Carta was a barely
enforceable document but put the rule of law out in the open for all
to see, and the Bill of Rights giving further power towards enforcing
the rule of law. Although the Magna Carta 1215 and the Bill of Rights
1688 may not have enforced the rule of law fully, they were indeed a
step in the right direction.
Today, we have freedom in many forms, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion. The Magna Carta and John Locke’s Second Treatise on Government laid the foundation for the freedom we enjoy today. The Magna Carta accomplished the liberty Englishmen currently enjoy by raising the status quo of peasants to commoner. This means those born to royalty will begin to treat the peasants as people, for instance the Magna Carta states, “(9) Neither we [feudal barons] nor our officials will seize any land or rent in payment of a debt, as long as the debtor has movable goods sufficient to discharge the debt.” Similarly to the U.S., which has three branches of government to limit power, executive, legislative and judicial; the Magna
The Magna Carta was the first document in which English subjects to force English king into power; granting and protecting the subjects’ rights. This was important since the king at the time could do anything that he so desired. However, in practice, this English legal charter did not limit the king’s power. The Magna Carta is the beginnings of American freedom. It is also the foundation of the American Constitution, reflecting English freedom and the power of the English government.
The Magna Carta developed through a tumultuous period of English History. Through the verge of a revolution, attack and civil war, all within 1215, a time where the Kings abused his power by excessive royal efforts which were funded by undue taxes that supported such endeavors. In determining whether the Magna Carta has legal nor symbolic significances, it is important to consider not only the history of the Magna Carta but the significance of the article, a review of its current legal meaning, its dominance towards the symbol of power in particularly the perspectives of the individual against the state which allowed for alternative perspectives on the article and one
the laws it chooses, 2. the rule of law, which says that laws must be
The Rule of Law has always been a widely discussed topic throughout the history of modern political thinking. It can be defined as, “the principle that all people and institutions are subject to and accountable to law that is fairly applied and enforced; the principle of government by law” (Dictionary.com). English philosopher John Locke and Genevan philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau have both developed well-rounded and detailed accounts on the Rule of Law and its crucial role in ensuring democracy and freedom in society. Despite the undeniable success and importance of their works and ideas, I believe ________ constructed a more persuasive and influential argument in explaining the extensive effects of the Rule of Law on government and society.
In English history, ideas about political rights and good government were rooted in documents and events. For example, the Magna Carta indicated that the king and nobles must respect the law, while the English Bill of Rights stated the Parliament alone had the power to make levy taxes and government rules. Another document that created lasting changes was the Declaration of Independence, which gave people the right to overthrow an unjust government and replace it. It allowed colonists to rebel against colonial rule and declare indepe...
During this time, the Magna Carta was written and signed. This limited the power of the king and he had to earn approval by the lords before he could make a decision. It also made it so a law can only be passed if it doesn’t go against the Magna Carta. It also implies religion by helping with giving the Church full rights that allows
There is a Centuries long debate as to why our Nation’s Founding Fathers chose for us to be ruled under rule of law instead of rule of man. Our Founding Fathers founded this nation on a promotion “We the People”. They ruled that we should be led under the rule of law rather than the rule of man for multiple reasons. Our government now though is stipulating whether or not the old American government made the right choice, when compared to other foreign countries. At the beginning of our country the Constitution was not meant to be read as a collection a suggestions rather as a way to get men away from their old tendencies. Those were the days where the rights of the average man were the top priority of the government. Today however we need to remember that the rule of the law is supposed to focus on the rights of the citizens and not on who is wearing what in Hollywood. Over the years we have ruined our government, even Woodrow Wilson said, “I have unwillingly ruined my government.” The factors now included in Rule of Law are a little different from they were 250 years ago. To find out why the Founding Fathers Chose Rule of Law we need to look at several reasons why our nations’ officials like or don’t like the rule of law. We must also look at whether the factors are too much at this point for our nations to change and go another way with our leadership and the way we run our country.
-Common Law: the “law of the land”(Pool 127), which was built up over many centuries
In "a view from the Bridge", justice and law are not presented as being synonymous.
The rule of law, simply put, is a principle that no one is above the law. This means that there should be no leniency for a person because of peerage, sex, religion or financial standing. England and Wales do not have a written constitution therefore the Rule of Law, which along with the parliamentary Sovereignty was regarded by legal analyst A.C Dicey, as the pillars of the UK Constitution. The Rule of Law was said to be adopted as the “unwritten constitution of Great Britain”.
support, the power to destroy, and most importantly the power to inform. The legislative branch
...(4) Sources: (1) http://www.lawteacher.net/administrative-law/essays/the-magna-carta-and-english-law-administrative-law-essay.php (2) http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/magna_carta.htm (3) http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm (4) http://www.law.berkeley.edu/library/robbins/CommonLawCivilLawTraditions.html (5) http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/featured_documents/magna_carta/ (6) http://www.skwirk.com/p-c_s-1_u-105_t-279_c-929/causes-and-effects-of-the-magna-carta/nsw/hsie/introduction-to-democracy/democratic-development (7) http://www.historyextra.com/feature/magna-carta-turning-point-english-history (8)
Law is a tool in society as it helps to maintain social control, promoting social justice. The way law functions in society and its social institution provide a mechanism for solutions. There are many different theories of the function of law in relation to society in considering the insight they bring to different socio-legal and criminological problems. In the discussion of law’s role in social theory, Leon Petrażycki and Eugen Ehrlich share similar beliefs in the jurisprudence of society. They focused their work on the experience of individuals in establishing meaning in their legal relations with others based on the question of what it means to be a participant in law. Jürgen Habermas presents a relationship between law and morality. From a certain standpoint, law is a key steering mechanism in society as it plays an educational role in promoting conducts, a mean of communication and it
The clash between good and evil perpetually permeates humanity. Balance of these forces through equality and tranquility is a goal sought after to amend injustice. Impartiality creates balance within a society. In addition, fairness through the application of law is a cornerstone of countless civilizations. The members of civilizations taught moralities through the tenets of religion heavily influence their integrity. The many manifestations and interpretations of righteousness confirm the eternal goal of civilization to do good unto others. Justice restores and perpetuates humanity’s high moral standing.