The Role Of Self-Government In British North America

700 Words2 Pages

Prior to the distinct, recognizable points of conflict that can be pinpointed between the colonists and Britain, the Crown confided in their superiority and felt the need to assert it onto the colonies, that their government is supreme above all interjections. The British bureaucracy installed multiple acts to spread their administrators, government, and justice system to their colonies: the Administration of Justice Act, the Massachusetts Government Act and the Quebec Act. All of these Acts appointed councils, governors and juries, that were of course, chosen by the Crown. Essentially, any right of self-government that the people created and molded for themselves was simply thrown to the chosen governor, or betterly worded: dictator. Enhancements and Crown …show more content…

Deeply rooted in our American maple, we find consent and individualism as a foundation they built upon. British North America had refined their government “palette” to a refreshing, yet progressing democracy, and it was all tugged away. Hushed. It is not difficult to see where the colonists felt oppressed, to a point where the trust in their mother country dipped. The colonies of British North America were tied to the crown, nevertheless, they had no representation within the crown, no official to translate their needs only, they had to rely on the illogical system of “virtual representation.” A basic right of the Englishman was freedom from taxation without consent, so in an extension of Britain, it is rational that the colonists benefit from the British constitution. The colonists had only elected representatives to their regional governments, with no say in representatives that were elected to the House of Commons, automatically no consent. The colonists, deep rooted in this principle, expected their “superiors” to comply

Open Document