For this assignment, I will analyze and explain a proactive crime prevention strategy that will likely decrease victimization in Centerville substantially. In addition, I will analyze and justify the victimology theory that best fits my strategy and explained how it does. Lastly, I will explain how the crime rate is determined and what the dark figure of crime is.
This paper is based on the analysis of the United States crime prevention programs that are being implemented at the state level, law enforcement authorities, government authorities or both. In this essay, I have critically analyzed the effectiveness of some crime prevention strategies. The effort and societies attempt to reduce victimization and stop criminal acts and crimes are known as crime prevention.
This essay will talk about what Situational Crime Prevention( SCP) is, it will also discuss the theoretical assumptions that underpin this approach, for example, the nature of the offender as well as examining how the SCP strategy has been used to deal with crime as well as the general pros and cons of such an approach.
Primarily, the publics’ perceptions that private security agencies and its employees have no legal authority, therefore, tends to disrespect them or not adhered to the directives or comply to the enforcement they intend to implement. The main goal of most private security agencies and guards are the same, protecting life and property, however this is an unyielding task for those in this profession. Another great challenge for private security lies in the supplies and demands of the community in which they serve. Economic environments tend to determine how successful private security can be. Most private security agencies rely on the demands of the company, the level of security they require, the length of the contract or assignment, and lastly, the budget in which the company has allowed for these services.
Security has been a common topic of controversy since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and even before then it was a constant subject. The image of buildings collapsing and billowing smoke has been engraved into the minds of Americans and will remain there for years to come. Security is an issue that we encounter everyday. Whether it is driving down the freeway or walking into the grocery store; we are cautious of what is going on around us. Men and women across this country are dedicated to enforcing laws; laws that are designed to ensure the security of our communities and our nation. In an effort to project a feeling of security, the government has set up a department whose sole purpose is to protect; the department of Homeland Security. We install surveillance cameras in banks, stores, restaurants, and homes. Those that we feel need more protection, such as celebrities and politicians, are constantly surrounded by body guards. One cannot work with children without having a detailed background check and receiving priority clearance. If one is willing to look hard enough or spend enough money, they can retrieve information on any specific person, and barely break a sweat.
An enduring debate exists in law enforcement regarding its true impact. Some agree while others disagree that the primary impact is displacement and diffusion of criminal activity when crime prevention efforts are used. The following discussion takes a closer look at this debate.
The Truth about Crime Prevention The truth about crime prevention is more complicated –less utopian than some liberals would like, but far more promising than conservatives will admit. Prevention can work and that it can be far less costly, in every sense, than continuing to rely on incarceration as out first defense against violent crimes. Instead of simply insisting that prevention is better than incarceration, then, we need to pinpoint more clearly what kinds of prevention work—and why some programs work and others do not, the most encouraging efforts share important characteristics; there are reasons why they work, whether the ‘target’ population is abusive families, vulnerable teens, or serious juvenile offenders who’ve already broken the law. Likewise, there are reasons why other programs fail, no matter how fashionable or popular they may be. Given what we’ve learned about crime prevention in recent years, four priorities seem especially critical: preventing child abuse and neglect, enhancing children’s intellectual and social development, providing support and guidance to vulnerable adolescents and working intensively with juvenile offenders.
Welcome to the United States, where we have a larger number of detainees than teachers, and that must say a great deal in regards to our framework. Wrongdoing is an issue that has influenced the United States and different parts of the world since the start of time. For the United States, the equity framework utilizes discipline as a technique to diminishing wrongdoing the nation over, however would it say it is truly meeting expectations? Some might say that discipline is the best manifestation of forestalling wrongdoing since it keeps the lawbreakers withdrawn from the world. Since the crooks are bolted up and serving their time, then that will be a route for the criminal to not precede their vicious demonstrations once he or she is back in this present reality. Be that as it may, this strategy is raising inquiries since over a large portion of the culprits who complete their detainment time submit an alternate crime that send them once more to jail. The same might strive for adolescents who begin with little criminal practices and develop to a greater lawful offense. So what is the solution? One approach to avert wrongdoing is to look past simply the wrongdoing carried out and discover the wellspring of the demonstration, which descends to the criminal and their youth or childhood. By having projects that have serious mediations around youngsters and grown-up lawbreakers at danger of submitting an alternate crime, I accept we might have the capacity to counteract further brutality. An alternate approach to lower wrongdoing rates is to have "hot spot policing", or more police compel in ranges where wrongdoing rates are the most elevated.
Fire Protection Handbook. 20thth ed. N.p.: National Fire Protection Association, 2008. N. pag. Web. 5 Feb. 2014. .
In most cases, law enforcement involves investigation of all forms of suspected, potential or actual criminal activities and presenting evidence arising from investigation to the courts for determination of criminal culpability and subsequent punishment. Law enforcement is also concerned with detaining criminal suspects pending further investigation or judicial action. These, however, are not the only responsibilities or functions of law enforcement. Law enforcement is also concerned with deterrence and prevention of crime as well as enforcement of all the orders given by the law courts such as writs or warrants. In addition, law enforcement play an important role in ensuring public safety, maintaining public order, operating c...