Having a parent consent makes a difference in a situation like this. If minors had to have a parental consent, there would be a drop in legal abortions. The reason a parent consent should be needed is because when teenagers are young they don’t really understand what to do in big situations like this. Without the consent of a parent, an abortion can harm the mother in many ways. Parents know things about their medical history that the minor may have questions about.
Otherwise, if the patient was alert and declined surgery, there was the end of it, as it is against the law to force a patient to take medications or accept treatments. However, patients who suffer from mental illness do not have much autonomy to decide for their treatments. In cases like this, the physicians and nurses take charge over the
Birth control is a major controversial issue for many reasons. Some may believe it should be a useful source to help not have an unwanted or surprised birth. Others may believe that it shouldn’t be allowed because a person should be responsible of their actions. It’s a good thing to use when not wanting to become pregnant but it can also be taken for advantage. Birth control is a good source to prevent teen pregnancy, regular pregnancy, and unprotected sex.
In health care, there are often times when the medical team and the patient disagree on the plan of care, but in pediatric health care, this becomes even more complex. This is because there are times where the decision made by the parents is deemed inappropriate by the health care team. What do you do if, as the caregiver, you do not agree with the decisions made for your patient by their surrogate decision-maker? It can be assumed that in most cases, parents only want what is best for their children. Research demonstrates, however, that parents do not always serve as the best voice for their child who is suffering, especially when the child is nearing the end of life.
Based on the situation, this case is legal, but may not be ethical. Although the parents have the legal right to consent to the new treatment for chemotherapy, they should also take their child’s desires into consideration before subjecting him to a more aggressive therapy. Legally the nurse must administer the medication that the physician has ordered and the parents have agreed upon, otherwise this would be considered a breach of duty. According to Guido (2010), a breach of duty is failure to perform a duty, causing a disturbance in treatment or cause a threatening act. The nurse functioned according to the standards of care an... ... middle of paper ... ... treatment, healthcare providers should think on legal and ethical terms and strive to avoid treatments that can be considered abusive to the patient.
Patients should be given this information because medicine is patient-centered, communication is necessary to build trust in a patient-doctor relationship, and withholding the truth seems to be more harmful to the patient in the long run. One crucial point that Lipkin fails to recognize is that medicine is patient-centered. Even though medicine has changed via technological advances, healthcare coverage, and ethics, one thing has remained constant – medicine provides care for the patient. More than that, medicine (especially primary care) emphasizes treating the patient as a person, not a diagnosis. In the story Being Mickey’s Doctor, the pediatrician who treats ten-year-old Mickey learns valuable lessons about being humanistic and compassionate.
Using semi-structured interviews, the authors explored, using inductive analysis, how parents cope with the moral burden of decision-making. The broad generalizations or themes generated are factors affecting parents’ decision-making. Parents of children with cancer are encumbered with many medical decisions. When parents experience decision-making, they are under very intense levels of stress. The research suggests this stress is not addressed with parents, and therefore, impedes their clarity when it is necessary to make decisions.
Should a doctor tell the truth directly to the patient regardless of the family’s wishes not to do that? Or in contrast, should the doctor simply tell the truth to the patient prior to his or her family? Ruiping Fan and Benfu Li’s journal article primarily focuses on whether or not a physician should tell truth to the patient. From a personal opinion, patients have the right to know their state of health. To be honest with a patient, despite his or her family's wishes, before telling the family ultimately depends on many things, such as the patient's age, medical conditions and circumstances, and religious beliefs.
Holvey states that the main reason physicians do not practice delayed cord clamping is because there is not enough research done about the risks it poses to infants and the mothers. In the event of an emergency, the time it takes for the extra blood to pass to the baby may be crucial. Early in the article Holvey answers the question she presents to the reader in the beginning, she gets to the point of her article early on which intrigues the
Doctors are not sure of information, because the doctor is this guy right help. Teen confidentiality concerns may be an important barrier to access to health services. Adolescents have the right to contraception confidentiality when it comes to contraception.