The Right to Carry

679 Words3 Pages
Skeptics have begun questioning the value of cellphone ownership as the number of unfortunate incidents regarding improper private phone use increases. Doubts emerge as to whether carrying a mobile phone is worth the trouble. Distraction and thoughtlessness run rampant among most of the country’s current citizens. Notwithstanding these certain details, mobile phones perform many valuable functions, with very little effort required, all in a moment’s time. Whether in dire situations where cellphone availability may save lives, or in everyday activities, these devices assist in pick-up and drop-off arrangements and scheduling changes. Cellphones benefit the user by way of communication, convenient access, and relief of safety concerns. Accordingly, with the ever-excelling advance of modern technology, general communication has altered greatly in the current era. Verbal expression by way of cellphone use is currently the most reliable form of connection despite separation. Wireless connections and services allow anyone to make a call from anyplace at anytime. Of course there are cases of abuse when acquaintances relentlessly dial their friends, leaving no time of peace no matter the circumstances. Nevertheless, unlike telephones, mobile phone users can turn their devices off or place the unit on silent and vibrate modes, limiting disruption. Parental objections toward children associating by cellphone stem from concerns toward failure to engage in direct human interaction. Text messaging from phones has gradually increased in popularity over the years. Although a legitimate issue, parents have the option to limit or prevent texting from their child’s phone with blocking and service plan modification. Meanwhile, communic... ... middle of paper ... ...e or hindrance arises, undeniably eases anxiety. After stopping to consider the advantages of cellphone ownership, disagreement remains futile. Mobile phones create security, stabilize uniform correspondence, and conserve discrete connection. While misuse, over dependency, and personal disconnection may occur from thoughtless behavior, the operator’s status of maturity is the only disputable issue: not the usefulness and advantageous functionality of the device. Conversation builds interconnection in a powerful manner, developing an unfaltering pathway for freedom and civility. Overall, protection and dependability should never be carelessly disregarded, despite all risks. Cellphones adequately supply limitless opportunities for vast improvement in everyday life, and thus personal possession should not be suppressed for common interest and welfare of the user.
Open Document