preview

The Rich Diversity of Meanings of the Pardoner's Tale

analytical Essay
5601 words
5601 words
bookmark

The Rich Diversity of Meanings of the Pardoner's Tale

Chaucer’s innovation in the Pardoner’s performance tests our concept of dramatic irony by suggesting information regarding the Pardoner’s sexuality, gender identity, and spirituality, major categories in the politics of identity, without confirming that information. Our presumed understanding of the Pardoner as a character lacks substantiation. As we learn about the Pardoner through the narrator’s eyes and ears, we look to fit the "noble ecclesiaste" (l. 708) into the figure shaped by our own prejudices and perceptions, as any active reader must do. But the Pardoner, ever aware of his audience, does not offer clear clues to his personality. This break between what the other characters say about the Pardoner and what the Pardoner says about himself has been a major source of tension for all readers of the Tales and especially critics who search for substantiation of their views beyond the Chaucer’s own language. The general tone of the Canterbury Tales is comic. After all, the pilgrims are traveling to the shrine St. Thomas Beckett in a public act of holy reverence, but the Tales take a darker turn when the Pardoner is brought to the foreground. The whole Canterbury Tales is a collected set of performances, stories told about telling stories. As Joseph Ganim has written, theatricality, by which he means "a governing sense of performance, an interplay among the author’s voice, his fictional characters, and his immediate audience," is "a paradigm for the Chaucerian poetic" (5). This paper shall endeavor to show that the major effect of the Pardoner’s presence in the Tales is to focus the reader’s attention to questions of performance and performativity, literary perception, ...

... middle of paper ...

...University of California Press, 1988.

Lochrie, Karma; McCracken, Peggy; Schultz, James A. Editors. Constructing Medieval Sexuality. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.

McAlpine, Monica E. “The Pardoner’s Homosexuality and How It Matters.” Geoffrey Chaucer’s The General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Ed. by Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1988. pp. 103-124.

Nevo, Ruth. “Chaucer: Motive and Mask in the General Prologue.” Geoffrey Chaucer’s The General Prologue to the Canterbury Tales. Ed. by Harold Bloom. New York: Chelsea House Publishers, 1988. pp. 9-20.

Ross, Thomas W. Chaucer’s Bawdy. New York: E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., 1972.

Sedgewick, G. G. “The Progress of Chaucer’s Pardoner, 1880-1940.” Chaucer: Modern Essays in Criticism. Ed. by Edward Wagnknecht. New York: Oxford University Press, 1959. pp. 126-158.

In this essay, the author

  • Analyzes how chaucer's innovation in the pardoner’s performance tests our concept of dramatic irony by suggesting information regarding his sexuality, gender identity, and spirituality.
  • Analyzes how the general prologue offers a first impression of the pardoner, which has affected his interpreted characterization to this day.
  • Analyzes the narrator's use of animal imagery in his portrait of the pardoner.
  • Argues that critics have accepted their comments as indicative of the pardoner's sexual deviance, either physical or social. the phrase "beel amy" of line 318 is regularly regarded as a homophobic jibe.
  • Argues that the text conveys some sense of sexual abnormality about the pardoner.
  • Argues that effeminacy connotes rambunctious heterosexuality in men, an excessive interest in and desire for women in medieval times.
  • Analyzes how chaucer's pardoner joins a list of fictional persons throughout western literature, whose vivacity and power lie in the tense relation of sexuality and morality that forms their characters.
  • Analyzes carolyn dinshaw's interpretation of the pardoner’s fashion consciousness as a critical trope for his deceptive appearance.
  • Analyzes how chaucer makes clear the nature of the pardoner's tale as a performance, not only as one of fifty-eight tales the pilgrims will tell on their journey to and from canterbury.
  • Analyzes how critics like harold bloom locate chaucer's strength as a poet in his vivid creation of character who create themselves through language.
  • Analyzes the dispute between linguistically-oriented interpretations of the characters as rhetorical effects of chaucer’s conscious manipulation of language and psychologically-oriened studies that treat the pilgrims as dramatic characters.
  • Argues that the pardoner's prologue and tale are melodramatic lamentations that icing the simple, yet effective story of the three rioters.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner's presentation lacks the substance necessary to achieve his desired results, so he turns to the delivery of the presentation itself.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner concludes the tale with the much-cited claim "i wol yow nat deceyve" (918), a deliberately ambiguous statement that perfectly fits his character and performance.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner's sermon and exemplum is manipulating the sermon tradition to cheat the "lewed" audience out of their money.
  • Analyzes how the tale is a vehicle for the pardoner's self-revelation and the evasion of identity through performance.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner makes his living by his ability to perform. he is a professional magician of words who suffers muted outrage when the truth of his conjuring is discovered.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner concludes the tale with the much-cited claim "i wol yow nat deceyve" (918), a deliberately ambiguous statement that perfectly fits his character and performance.
  • Analyzes how chaucer blesses the pardoner with a distinct performative style and technique. his abject, spectacular life offer the raw material for the emotional force of his tale.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner is a practical rhetorician, mastering diverse ways of persuading an audience to act as he wishes.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner adapts his presentation with each re-reading to the benefit of his audience.
  • Analyzes how the pardoner, his prologue, and his tale are evocative emotionally, spiritually, morally and aesthetically. chaucer's fictive power is his powerful hold over our imaginations as readers.
  • Explains benson, c. david, chaucer's drama of style: poetic variety and contrast in the canterbury tales.
  • Introduces harold bloom to geoffrey chaucer's the general prologue to the canterbury tales.
  • Describes bronson, bertrand h., "the pardoner's confession." twentieth century interpretations of the pargiver’s tale.
  • Introduces dewey r. faulkner in twentieth century interpretations of the pardoner’s tale: a collection of critical essays.
  • Explains that ginsberg, warren, and harold bloom have written geoffrey chaucer's the general prologue to the canterbury tales.
  • Explains green, richard firth, and lisa j. kiser's "the pardoner’s pants (and why they matter)."
  • Describes harrington, david v., "narrative speed in the pardoner's tale." twentieth century interpretations.
  • Explains that huppé, bernard f. a reading of the canterbury tales. albany: state university of new york, 1967.
  • Explains jordan, chaucer's poetics and the modern reader, berkeley: university of california press, 1987.
  • Explains koff, leonard michael. chaucer and the art of storytelling. berkeley: university of california press, 1988.
  • Describes lochrie, mccracken, and schultz, in constructing medieval sexuality.
  • Explains mcalpine, monica e., and bloom's the general prologue to the canterbury tales.
  • Describes geoffrey chaucer's the general prologue to the canterbury tales.
  • Explains sedgewick, g. g, and wagnknecht's chaucer: modern essays in criticism.
Get Access