The Rhetorical Analysis Of The Lowest Animal, By Mark Twain

1039 Words3 Pages

Mark Twain is one of the best-known writers of all time, writing things that are most commonly known for being humorous and relaxed. In “The Lowest Animal”, Twain discusses his final outcome after completing a series of experiments he undertook at the London Zoological Gardens. His end result is Charles Darwin’s theory that man evolved from earlier ancestors, but flipped completely upside down. This theory is widely known, but Twain argues a different one. In this essay, he uses affective reasoning and facts from his experiments to back up his claim, all while using Aristotle’s appeals and logical fallacies.
Before he goes on claiming, he states three things that he thinks should be said before everything else to make things clear: “1. That the human race is of one distinct species…. 2.That the quadrupeds (four footed animals) are a distinct family, also…. 3. That the other families—the birds, the fishes, the insects, the reptiles, etc.—are more or less distinct, also….” (Twain). I think the reasoning behind stating these is exactly what Twain said, to make things clear. He is trying to say that all of these groups of animals are a family, but each individual …show more content…

He uses the either/or fallacy, pretending that there are only two sides. He goes on to say, “Men keep harems, but it is by brute force, privileged by atrocious laws which the other sex was allowed no hand in making.” (Twain). The issue is men keeping a bunch of females around and he says that it is only because they force them to. He doesn’t give the other option that maybe it’s because some women do like that and decides to be with a man that has other female companions. By showing only one side, it manipulates the reader by giving them only one option, and thus making the man in a much lower place than the

Open Document