Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion on IT governance
Conclusion on IT governance
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion on IT governance
‘The responsibility of executives and the board of directors; consists of the leadership, organizational structures and processes that ensure that the enterprise’s IT sustains and extends the enterprise’s strategies and objectives’; what ISACA defines as IT governance. IT governance is something that should be executed in every business and even within decision-making within groups of individuals. As being apart of the United States Air Force, IT governance has definitely been adopted into my organization. With the military budgets tightening, the Air Force is cutting positions. Efficiencies gained from ever more powerful technology are a primary tool for more effectively accomplishing our mission despite having fewer airmen. Increased reliance on technology while budgets are tightening makes our investments in information technology all the more critical. With the reduction of personnel, we begin to rely more on the advances of technology to still success with our mission.
There are three levels of leadership starting that play a role in governing and deciding on the advances in the Air Force. Starting with the Headquarters of the Air Force (Air Staff) then to the Major Command (MAJCOM) and to the air force base level. Knowledgeable personnel were identified at each level to assist in completing the decision making matrix from their organization’s perspective. For the headquarters level, many different offices play a role in governing the various domains.
There was an agreement that the high-level role of IT within the AF was set by the Secretary of the AF and the Chief of Staff of the Air Force (CSAF). The CSAF Strategic Plan set out three primary goals for the Air Force: Win the Global War on Terror, Develop and Care for Airme...
... middle of paper ...
...ctive IT governance, but many more steps are required to get there.
I have focused on the Air Staff, MAJCOM, and base levels, but lots of IT decisions are made and big budgets are executed through System Program Offices. Tracing IT governance through the SPO structure might shed more light on how systems could more effectively be acquired so they integrate better into operations from the beginning.
The goals and architectures developed at the Air Staff tend to include the wide spectrum of IT capabilities from war fighting to home base business operations. The processes in place at MAJCOM and below are typically concerned with business operations with little emphasis on warfighting operations. Funding decisions ultimately drive which projects get pursued. With a clean sheet of paper, how could funding processes be designed to facilitate stronger governing practices?
...e days later Hewlett-Packard was awarded the largest federal IT government project of all time. This is a $3.5 billion contract working for the U.S. Navy on their communication systems. HP is in charge of the Navy’s communication systems until 2019, which includes over 800,000 intranet users. Due to HP’s success at doing what they’re supposed to do in their government contracts, they were given another contract in 2013 over several big companies. The contract is for three years and $56 million. HP’s task is to implement applications management services to provide complete security authority for military personnel, and Department of Defense employees and contractors. The last contract I found was one awarded to HP for around $548 million from the Department of Defense’s DMDC. Hewlett-Packard is to provide support services that are reliable and commercially available.
Do not let any one individual in your IT group become the sole point of failure. Correct assessment; ironically it was a knowledge management system that led to the crash of the network. Succession planning is key ingredient to success for businesses.
Sir, I am honored by the privilege to once again serve in 4th Armored Brigade Combat Team (ABCT). Over of the last 30 days, I had an opportunity to reconnect, and reflect on the current state of the Brigade. The 4th ABCT has a rich history of success and glory. It is my goal to put in place the systems and practices for this great organization to exceed all past and present accomplishments. As a result of my assessment, I identified three areas of focus that will improve our organization: a unit vision, a change in organizational culture and climate, and building organizational teams. I have no doubt that with the implementation of these three areas of focus, I will be the transformational leader that 4th ABCT needs as we prepare for the upcoming National Training Center (NTC) rotation and tackle the task of the Regionally Aligned Forces (RAF) mission.
As the Executive Officer for the 478th Aeronautical System Wing (478 AESW) I have a unique position of significant influence, ensuring the ability of the USAF to provide Air Dominance well into the 21st century. But, as you will see it has been a winding road that got me here, and a unique set of experiences that have prepared me to serve in this position.
Top companies need to develop a strong performance anatomy which allows them to continually pursue customer-valued innovations and differentiate from the competitors. And an increasingly important component of this strong performance anatomy is the company’s IT capability which allows a business focussed on high performance to create and act on customer and business insights in real time, create new products and services and transform business models. Likewise a strong and proactive IT governance model is also important which insures that business leaders are involved in planning and aligning IT initiatives with business priorities which is well understood by Accenture. And the company’s IT governance demands are particularly heavy as well being a heavily matrixed organization with five operating groups, 17 focused industry grou...
This paper focuses on the impact of Management of Information Systems (MIS) on Boeing. In this endeavor, it highlights the new technologies that will most likely impact on the organization and structure. In addition, the paper discusses possible impacts of new technological advancement on the company, to remain competitive in the face of the new technological developments. In this regard, the paper reflects on the possible strategies that Boeing is likely to adapt so that it remains competitive that is, by introducing new technological developments. Finally, with such a move of adapting or not adapting the new technology, this research paper looks at risks that are associated with both moves that the company might opt for.
The framework we will follow for the DoD is a descriptive control framework, which provides for governance at a high level. T...
Iskandar, M., & Salleh, N. A. M. (2010). IT Governance in Airline Industry: A Multiple Case Study. International Journal of Digital Society, 1(4), 308-314.
The United States of America is a powerful and well known force throughout the world. It has become a superpower of nations in just about three hundred years, being one of the newest nations in existence today. Its military reaches out into several countries in the globe and holds a presence as a peacekeeper and wielder of democracy. Of the US military’s five branches, the Air Force is the ruler of the skies, keeping control of the earth’s aerospace. Without the Air Force Special Operations, the military could not complete operations as effectively or efficiently as it potentially could. The United States Air Force is a key part of America’s mission to spread and assist democracy throughout the world.
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
As for their specialization in IT, they spearhead the planning for maximizing IT as a leverage point against competitors. In the case of government agencies, the Chief Information Officer is “highly responsible for strategic planning for all information and technology management functions—thus, the term information resources management (IRM) strategic planning” (44 U.S.C. 3506(b) (2)).
Whitman, M. & Mattord, H. (2010). Mangement of information security. (p. 339). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Not a blessed thing. As a UAS Tactical Operations Technician, my primary duties were Standardization Officer and Maintenance Officer. I directly supervised two Instructor Operators and two Quality Control NCOS. Was I responsible for the totality of each program? Of course, but I was not going to go TI a procedure. I was not going to go conduct an APART. I would directly supervise my direct subordinates, and so set the tone for those sections. As a Platoon Leader, I directly supervised, as well as partnered with, my Platoon Sergeant, my UAS Technician and my Maintenance Section Sergeant. What has remained my primary responsibility with all of these senior NCOs and WOs? Cultivation and development. The tactics you use to address issues may change, the level of organization may change, but your responsibility will never