Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Greek democracy research paper
Reading The Republic has been a great eye opener. Knowing that Plato and Socrates dabbled in philosophical thinking excited me even more to read the book. Although I disagree with the way in which the argument was carried out, I love how Socrates questioned many of the things that he noticed was wrong within his government as well as with the thinking process of his fellow citizens—I believe this whole time he was trying to tell his counterparts that the government in which they live is corrupted and there needs to be a change.
With that being said, there are many ideas and concepts Socrates mentioned that created serious dialogue within my thoughts and struck me as worth noting. Primarily, it was very significant for me when Socrates shone
…show more content…
“While I was contemplating on the logistics of the parable, I stumbled upon a thought: If the partially unrighteous and the perfectly righteous are allowed to enjoy the same reward, with one of the two categories being delayed by some time of punishment, what is the point of giving much effort in trying to be good? …It even goes against Socrates’ notion of the importance of the just man being completely good or else he is not just. It also clashes against the importance of pursuing the higher intellectual realm because even those who are not above that realm will enjoy the same “heavenly delights and visions of inconceivable beauty” that is the reward for those who do little to great good.” (quoted from my last assignment). When I noticed this contradiction, it became apparent to me that we must question the validity of everything “normal” in our society and our lives. I strongly believe that people who have grown up being spoon fed their thoughts and ideas would benefit greatly from noticing this quirk because they will find the purposefulness or the uselessness of many things in their lives that guide them in their daily crafts. I also think that people who have been surrounded by things that are far from the guide lines of normalcy would benefit from noticing this …show more content…
I relate to this because all my life, or at least for as long as I can remember, I have tried to be perfect at everything because that’s how I was raised to think—that I am “the best” and that anything that I have accomplished or that anyone has accomplished before me, I could do even better. Though this thought process is helpful in the sense that it led me to be a persistent child growing up, it also led to me wanting to be a perfectionist and having anxiety at times when I couldn’t achieve exactly what I had in mind. “In the text, Socrates gives an example of a hypothetical situation where a man who is a trader by nature forcibly becomes a warrior because of the potential benefits that may arrive with the obtainment of the duty. With his inadequacy, his decision places the citizens of the state in danger… when one gives themselves to their natural craft, they help the State and are actively contributing to keep it out of harm 's way.” (quoted from one of my reflections) This realization helped me to see that I am not meant to be everything and anything; I am not perfect and that’s okay. Though I shouldn’t give up my passions, I should narrow down what I would like to do in life to what I am skilled at and to what I enjoy. I believe people like me in the world would benefit from hearing that. Some people stress
Socrates put one’s quest for wisdom and the instruction of others above everything else in life. A simple man both in the way he talked and the wealth he owned, he believed that simplicity in whatever one did was the best way of acquiring knowledge and passing it unto others. He is famous for saying that “the unexplained life is not worth living.” He endeavored therefore to break down the arguments of those who talked with a flowery language and boasted of being experts in given subjects (Rhees 30). His aim was to show that the person making a claim on wisdom and knowledge was in fact a confused one whose clarity about a given subject was far from what they claimed. Socrates, in all his simplicity never advanced any theories of his own but rather aimed at bringing out the worst in his interlocutors.
Plato. Republic. Trans. G.M.A. Grube and C.D.C. Reeve. Plato Complete Works. Ed. John M. Cooper. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1997.
Destiny of the Republic by Candice Millard is a non fiction book on the killing of James
I believe that by Socrates complying with he sentence order by Athenians, he got his point across and he stood up for what he believe in and he never back down.
My fellow countrymen, I stand before you today in order to defend the necessity of small republics for democracy and liberty. Let us begin with Montesquieu’s simple thesis: Large republics are incapable of self-government because of the massive and inevitable diversity of their populations and of the interests of that population (153). This leads to a corruption of the principles of democracy and ends liberty. Using Montesquieu’s elegantly argued The Spirit of Laws as a framework to discuss and reflect upon the principles of a democratic republic and the necessity of a small republic, I hope to articulate herein the reasons you should come to see this most brilliant insight, honorable gentlemen.
Socrates lived such a private life that it lead to the most important revelation of his entire life. He would go about his life doing nothing but self-examination. In examining his life so strenuously others would come to him to be taught, or to have their children be taught by Socrates. They would offer him money and he would refuse. They would do whatever they could to learn anything Socrates had to teach. What they did not know is that Socrates was not teaching anyone he was simply going about his usual life and people just happened to learn from it. This was also why Socrates was put on trial. He was brought up on two charges, one of impiety and the other of corrupting the youth. These two charges set the course for the last month of his life.
Two great philosophers had individual concepts of tranny that both shared the idea that this form of government was flawed. The first philosopher is named Plato. Plato was born around the year 428 BCE in Athens. He began his philosophy journey when influenced by his mentor Socrates. Socrates was a Greek philosopher who greatly aided in creating what is known as the Western Political Thought. Socrates taught Plato to question all that was around him and go in search for answers. One of the concepts Plato was taught was to question the way that those in Athens were being ruled. Socrates taught Plato that ruling through oppression and force also known as tyranny was far from the correct way to govern. From Socrates learnings Plato developed his own ideas of tyranny. His form of expression,
The Republic is considered to be one of Plato’s most storied legacies. Plato recorded many different philosophical ideals in his writings. Addressing a wide variety of topics from justice in book one, to knowledge, enlightenment, and the senses as he does in book seven. In his seventh book, when discussing the concept of knowledge, he virtually addresses the cliché “seeing is believing”, while attempting to validate the roots of our knowledge. By his use of philosophical themes, Plato is able to further his points on enlightenment, knowledge, and education.
To begin with, Socrates is obviously a proud man, and when he declares that he will never give way to anyone for the sake of h...
Plato does not argue whether it is more moral to live justly, but rather whether it is more beneficial, whether the just life will make one happier.
Out of the confrontation with Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, Socrates emerges as a reflective individual searching for the rational foundation of morality and human excellence. The views presented by the three men are invalid and limited as they present a biased understanding of justice and require a re-examination of the terminology. The nature in which the faulty arguments are presented, leave the reader longing to search for the rational foundations of morality and human virtue.
Societies hold value in the respect and virtuous abilities over others often times put justice on a pedestal and hold tight to it. In the eyes of Socrates is Plato’s Republic, Book VI he states that “In a suitable one [constitution], his [a philosopher's] own growth will be fuller and he will save the community as well as himself” (Plato “Republic”, p. 177, 497a). When you break it down this quote means when abiding by the laws held by the community each man must try to pursue the most virtuous version of themselves. However, being only a “suitable constitution” (Plato “Republic”, p. 177, 497a) there is no true way to become completely virtuous. However, it describes that all men have the ability to try. This notion carries on to describe that said acts will have great purpose among one’s peers. One mans’ betterment can affect not only himself but also the imperfect justice system of the community in great ways.
The second book of the Republic shows the repressive quality of Plato’s society. Plato, talking through Socrates, wants
Socrates was a renowned philosopher in the ancient Grecian times. His peak was around the Peloponnesian War, when the Spartans defeated the Athenians and ended the Golden Age. The reason Socrates is one of histories most famous philosophers is largely due to Plato's writings. Two of Plato's famous works include The Apology and The Republic, both written about Socrates' views about the so called "wise philosophers" of his time. The two works hold unique views about government, as well as opening the eyes of the Grecian people to the world as they knew it.
Plato. The Republic. Trans. Sterling, Richard and Scott, William. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1985.