It’s also important because it showed how slavery was a sin and that the South and North wouldn’t have did anything if it wasn’t for this Address. Another reason is that Lincoln wrote this address to call on the attention of the nation. He wanted the nation to build up again. Another question you may ask is, what is the main purpose why Abraham Lincoln wrote this address? The first purpose is to say Abraham Lincoln’s plan to have peace or reconcile with the nation after the civil war.
DiLorenzo says that, “… Lincoln stated over and over that he was opposed to racial equality” (11). Before his reign as governor of Illinois and presidency, Lincoln ... ... middle of paper ... ...k, The Real Lincoln, was written to change one’s ideas about the man that Abraham Lincoln really was. Lincoln is very often regarded as the man who fought to end slavery and secure the rights of man. However, DiLorenzo makes strong arguments that Lincoln did not fight the war to combat slavery, and only wanted to expand the size of the federal government. DiLorenzo uses numerous sources, including comments Lincoln himself made, in order to prove his point.
DiLorenzo wrote this book to discredited Lincoln’s good name. He wanted to show Lincoln as a racist politician who had a set agenda to have a centralized government that our founding fathers feared and did not want to happen. He portrays Lincoln has a president who abandoned the constitution and moral code and waged war on civilians. This book describes how Lincoln may have saved the Union, but in doing so he destroyed the idea of the Union and all it stood for. Works Cited Gamble, Richard M. “The Real Lincoln.” Indepent Review 7, no.4(Spring 2003):611.
His accomplishments in preserving the Union, abolish slavery, establishing the Republican Party, enforcing the first income tax, and the construction transcontinental railroad all helped in establishing who Abraham Lincoln was. References Bailey, B., Blight, D., Katzman, D., Logevall, F., Norton, M., Paterson, T., & Tuttle, W., (2007). A people and a nation. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston, MA. Davis, C. K.. Don’t know much about History: Everything you need to know about American history.
In fact, evidence from the speeches of leaders on both sides proves that each side had a very different meaning for the war and wished to achieve very different outcomes. Contrary to what I originally believed this war much more than the issue of slavery. While the South was very concerned with the possibility of abolishing slavery, securing their rights and obtaining sovereignty was their main driving factor. The North did not simply want to end slavery either. President Lincoln was much more concerned with keeping the Union together because once one state left it would lead to others and eventually the “United States of America” would become the “Sovereign States of America.” That’s not to say that slavery was not a huge player in the Civil War though.
To understand how a future civil war is possible, you first have to examine the causes and conditions that led this country to its first civil war. When asked what the main cause of the civil war was, one might say slavery, and they would be correct. But the American Civil War was much more than a fight over slavery, because in reality plenty of southerners did not own slaves, and numerous northerners participated in the owning of slaves as well. At t... ... middle of paper ... ...le to meet the needs everyone wants to believe they have. Thus, it will cause an American Civil War, and as Lieutenant Colonel Patterson says, “the results would probably not be pretty, we would become a policed country, which is bad, basically you would see soldiers everywhere and you could only go to certain places at certain times, you wouldn’t want to see that our country” (Patterson, Lt. Col.Vincent).
The Truth in the Civil War The Civil War started in 1861, and though it was more than a century ago, there is still controversy and many questions arising about the subject. What were they really fighting over? Should the South have been able to succeed? What were the South’s true reasons for succeeding? Was the North’s only reason to go to war to free the slaves?
DiLorenzo, Thomas J. The Real Lincoln: A New Look at Abraham Lincoln, His Agenda, and an Unnessecary War. New York, NY: Three Rivers Press, 2002. Abraham Lincoln was elected as sixteenth president of the United States of America in 1861 and served until his assassination in 1865. He is viewed as a popular political figure and is known as the “Great Emancipator” for his role in freeing the slaves during the 1860s (Columbia University Press 2013, 1).
Neely does an outstanding job of relating and explaining Lincoln's Whig viewpoint, his regard to trade and industry development through industrialization, his anti-slavery feelings as well as his move to the Republican Party in 1856. He believes Lincoln made a cognizant decision to stay in New Salem after being overwhelmed for the state government in 1832 since it gave him a foundation to work from if he could stumble on a way to make ends get together until the next election. Lincoln, by means of the third person accent, said he stayed in New Salem as ... ... middle of paper ... ...civil freedoms were not rationally reliable but formulated with a analysis to win the war. He efficiently confronts modern allege that Lincoln punished critics by locking them up prior to elections. Lots of those under arrest were associate refugees or blockade runners from England individuals who could not take part in an election.