Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
a thesis for ramayana
is ramayana faced with good and evil
a thesis for ramayana
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: a thesis for ramayana
The Ramayana is a summary of good and evil in society. It mentions the importance of gods, demigods, warriors, etc. and what roles they played during the time. Ramayana shows both the good and evil in all characters and shows the significant roles they had. The Ramayana talks about ideas, concepts and values that are still used in modern Hinduism.
The Ramayana takes place in the city of Ayodhya. King Dasharatha was the king and had three wives with whom he had sons. Ram and Lakshmana were brothers and throughout the story are mostly the main characters. The other brothers had roles too but not as significant as Ram and Lakshmana. Once a king and now a sage, Vishwamitra comes for help. He asks King Dashartha if he can take along Rama and Lakhsmana to fight against demons that have been disturbing societies throughout the city. The king is reluctant but then allows his sons to along this trip with Vishwamitra.
Ram and Lakshmana are presented as the good characters, while there more other as well. It has been said that Ram had come into earth as a reincarnation of Vishnu, who is to one of the most powerful gods mentioned in Hinduism. I will be explaining why I believe both Ram and Lakhsmana are strongly the good characters of the story with
…show more content…
He appeared to having ten heads. Each head represent something, six of them for the knowledge of Shastra’s (rules) and the other four for Vedas (religious texts). He was follower of Shiva, but someone who wished to overthrow the Devas (Brahmin, Vishnu, and Shiva). He takes revenge from Ram and Lakshmana for cutting the nose of his sister Shurpanakha by kidnaping Rama’s wife, Sita. As I was saying earlier, Lakshmana being naïve and listening to Sita’s request left her vulnerable to be kidnapped by Ravana (King of Lanka). It all happened because he disguised himself as a poor beggar and was able to take Sita captive as she passes the Lakshmana
If these characters were both purely evil, and had no guilt whatsoever, this would be simply a boring story of unhinged men. Adding both good and evil sides to an individual adds a little something extra to the story that distinguishes it from many other pieces of literature. Aside from adding to the storyline, these morally ambiguous characters give students a chance to practice their skill at analyzing characters and think for themselves, forming their own outlooks on the characters and the book as a whole.
This story contains an almost equal balance of good and evil, though it also raises questions of what is truly good. It blurs the line between good and selfish or thoughtless. Characters’ actions sometimes appear impure, but in the long run, are good.
It is a coming of age story that outlines a boy’s personal growth and triumphs. Being able to reflect on the significance of the events that have led to his triumphs is critical, as it helps the reader understand their impact on his life and where he is coming from in the decisions he makes in the story. Such reflection is very important; as it makes the situations in the story more clear to the reader, and the story is then more easy and enjoyable to read. First person is the best point of view, in this story, for recounting these events, as it allows for a more personal and thereby more insightful reflection on the importance of the experiences he has. For example, the reader only learns of the importance of Paresh to the main character when he reflects “if I hadn’t tagged along with my family [that] day, I wouldn’t have met him that first time”(109). This indicates to the reader that Paresh will be an important figure in the protagonist’s life, which helps guide the reader’s understanding of the situation. The reader recognizes that Paresh will play a critical role in the main character’s life, and this helps the reader anticipate what may happen
The epic hero’s journeys hold the hopes for future of ordinary people’s lives. The Epic of Gilgamesh was written in approximately 2000 B.C.E which is highly enriched with Ancient Mesopotamian religions, and The Ramayana was written by ancient Indians in around 1800 B.C.E. The stories were written in two different parts of the world. However, these two stories etched great evidence that show people from generation to generation that different cultures and religions are interconnected; they share ideas with each other. Both Gilgamesh and Rama traveled long journeys in these tales. These epic journeys played a role in the creation of different archetypes. We can clearly see that these two tales share similarities between these archetypes. Although
Professor’s Comment: This student was very wise not to summarize Tolkien's Lord of the Rings. The student’s primary intention was to describe the ethical themes that can be found in the book. The first part of this essay describes Tolkien's view on the nature of good and evil, while the second part deals with his ethics of individuals. Excellent work!
In Khaled Hosseini’s novel “The Kite Runner,” he illustrates a fine line between what is defined as morally good and evil. During their lives as kids, Amir and Hassan had always been close, but there had always been one problem. Amir was the son of a rich and powerful Pashtun man who was almost always given everything he wanted, while Hassan was a Hazara boy who had spent his life serving Amir and his family with his father. Although the two of them seemed to always be inseparable when they played games or flew kites, there was always the defining factor of who they really are, a servant and his master.
The film “Sita Sings the Blues” and “Ramayana the Epic” are two versions of the Ramayana but were portrayed in different ways. “Sita Sings the Blues” was presented by Nina Paley based on Valmiki 's version of the Ramayana and she showed the side that many people don 't know and fail to accept about the Ramayana, Sitas side of the story. She doesn 't portray Rama to be the ideal husband although he goes through the trouble of saving Sita. In the film “Sita Sings the Blues” Nina Paley did not show Lakshmana throughout the whole journey of Rama leaving Ayodhya and trying to finding Sita. Also, Rama himself ends up killing Ravana which was different in the film “Ramayana the Epic.” In the film “Ramayana the Epic,” Rama was portrayed as the ideal
Characters can be described or defined as the people, animals or divine beings in a story or a plot. Firstly, the character that was defined best was Moses because the character was represented accurately and some changes were made for the purpose of keeping 1 main character. Moreover, a difference between the movie and the bible is that Moses and all of the other characters never seem to age. Throughout the movie he stays the same but I believe this to be the producers making sure that Moses was the main character. Another difference was, Moses was a very bad speaker in the bible. He told God this in the burning bush scene and God said let Aaron speak for you but in the movie purely because it was his movie and keeping him central he was made as a good public speaker and confronted Ramesses alone. The final difference between the bible and the movie is that during the movie Moses grew up with his non-biological brother Ramses who soon became the pharaoh who would deny the freedom of the Hebrews after Moses realised that his non-biological father who was the old pharaoh was throwing babies into the river. In the bible there is no mention of a non-biological brother and the same pharaoh stayed in power throughout the entire book. Therefor the characters are quite accurately portrayed but overall they were average.
In a lifetime, one will face an abundance of personal battles in their decision making. When bad decisions result negatively, people find peace mentally in redeeming themselves of their sin through redemption. In Khaled Hosseini’s “The Kite Runner”, the main character, Amir, commits a sin and goes through great lengths to find redemption. Using metaphors, personification, and irony Hosseini expresses the theme of sin, suffering and redemption. Achieving redemption is a long journey people seek after suffering the consequences of sin.
William Golding’s Lord of the Flies is an author’s painting of the evil that resides in all of the human race. The tropical island setting presents an environment free from civil order introducing a battle ground for the war of good and evil. Showing different side of human nature one can ponder the question “What would I do?” Golding explains the good, bad and balance of human nature, revealing that in times of despair man can easily regress to a primitive state, leaving the strong willed to promote civil order, but often be extremely out numbered.
the bad. The main characters on the good side are Harry Potter and his two friends, Ron Weasley and Hermione Granger, and on the bad the main character is Lord Voldomort. Harry Potter is a courageous, brave, and kind person. The whole series revolves around Harry Potter and Lord Voldomort. Ron Weasley is Harry’s closest friend and is not always the brightest but he is a good person who always stands with Harry no matter the situation. Hermione Granger is a book worm, straight A student who turns every assignment in on time and always does whatever her teachers tell her to do, and because of her skill and knowledge she has helped the trio out of several tight situations. Lord Voldomort is the most evil of the evil. His goal is to rule the world, kill every muggle (non magical people) so that only wizards are left and, most importantly, to conquer death. Through out the entire series Voldomort has tried to kill Harry a total of eight times but has failed all because of his short-sightedness and un-willingness to admit to his weaknesses.
The Ramayana is the most famous and well-known of all Indian epics, originally based on an epic poem it has taken many variations and forms over the centuries. Traditionally the story centers on the hero Prince Rama, who is the embodiment of virtue and perseverance, as he is wrongfully denied his birthright of being crowned king and instead is unjustly exiled into the forest where he encounters his fair share of dilemma. In R. K. Narayan’s condensed, modern version of The Ramayana the classic conflict of duality is a predominant theme, as Rama faces many instances of uncertainty and trivial chaos which are eventually balanced by order and goodness under the laws of karmic causation and dharma alike which he virtuously strives to uphold. Nina
The Epic of Gilgamesh is a moving tale of the friendship between Gilgamesh, the demigod king of Uruk, and the wild man Enkidu. Accepting ones own mortality is the overarching theme of the epic as Gilgamesh and Enkidu find their highest purpose in the pursuit of eternal life.
Vikas Swarup illustrates several significant catalysts that lead to dramatic changes in Ram's life, from slum dog to becoming a billionaire. The dreams to believe it can happen and to want a better life, the ability to form important relationships and love to want to change, and the ability to acquire important character traits such as helping others and empathy. This story teaches us to always be good to other people when they are in need, no matter the circumstances. Ram was always good to people and always did the right thing and in the end it payed off and he won one billion rupees.
In R.K. Narayan’s version of The Ramayana, Rama used dharma to represent the ideal qualities of kingship by adhering to the social conventions of constructs like caste, class, gender, and race, and set an example for all as to how to form a cohesive society.