Dear Professor, I read Week Two Discussion Board...see below. Having a tough time trying to put into words that explains both sides of the question. Having a hard time on finding solid resources to answer this question! I’m not sure I am on the right track, and wanted your opinion on what I have so far. Are there any resources that you could point to or recommend without telling me the answers? Could I propose this question to the discussion board without embarrassing myself? I feel way out of my league on trying to answer this discussion board. Week 2: Discussions The IP protocol provides a best effort, unreliable service. Due to its nature, several items like quality of service (QoS) and complex network usage billing are not possible to obtain or can only be obtained with some limitations. IP’s very simple design, on the other hand, is an advantage, which allows it to be very fast, limits complexity on the devices that connect using it, and is easy to implement. Some people believe having a simple network protocol is optimal, while others believe that complexity in a network infrastructure achieves smarter networks. What do you think of this debate? Let’s hear both sides of the subject. I think for decades now, the complication of networks has remained unchanged. Network services are even more complex and being impacted by new challenges with the advent of Social Media, VOIP, Video, virtualization, Cloud Computing, and MPLS. Todays business trends include globalization, the emergence of virtual computing, teleworking, BYOD, and mobility have lead to the spread of connected devices and an explosion in the address space, putting even more pressure on these services. Furthermore, Smartphones outnumber computers 2-1 and ... ... middle of paper ... ... their productivity and return on investments and offer enhanced services to their customers.” I find it hard to believe that statement. My experience in the Army started in 1983 thru 2003, then eight more years to 2013 in the Federal Government. I watched and experienced technologies come and go along with their complexity e.g. Token Ring, Bus, to a Star Mesh/Hybrid, Lan manager, ADSL, windows 3.1 to Server 2008, Linux and Unix. The landscape is changing due to the impact of the explosive expansion of the Internet and IP as the selected medium. Additionally, the adoption of Broadband, 3,4, and 5G technologies, wireless technologies such as 802.11ac (Gigabit Speeds), WIMAX and the adoption of IPv6. I believe we are moving to a state of “Everything over IP” (EOIP). Only by creating or having solid Standards in place will help in simplifying network infrastructures.
(In the sources cited, I could pick a few sentences from each and claim them as my own to make a splendid presentation. But they are not my own, and the question is pretty simple as is the answer. I could also research this for hours upon hours, as I have been known to do, and surely make it my own. This time, I will follow the advice one of my instructors said to his class here at CCC: “Keep it simple, stupid”).
-Support your answer in 2-3 sentences, give specific examples from lectures and readings -Tie your language to the language of the question
Technology will continue to improve therefore each organization has the opportunity to advance and take advantage of the new techniques and methods that are being used by successful organization that has proven themselves by continuing to provide excellent services for the community and each employee. Now when you see an organization that didn 't make it you ask yourself the question were they ready did they do all that could have been done to save the business, did they hire the correct people, was training offered to all employees, The factors that were stated will make and break an organization if these steps aren 't followed it could lead to failure in the organization.
What are the main points of contention surrounding this issue? Be sure to thoroughly discuss contrasting perspectives and the underlying reasons explaining the different positions people take on this topic.
Choose one of the following topics and write a well-organized essay with evidence supporting the statements you set forth. Your response should be two pages, double spaced with a 12 font in Times New Roman:
In about ½ of a page (single-spaced), please state whether you agree, disagree, or have a mixed opinion regarding the following statement and argue, via evidence and claims from what you have learned in class, why you have picked your stated position. Be sure to comprehensively explain and support your reasoning.
Information technology has advanced in multiple ways in society, where organizations has implement the structure into their work environment. Industries have outsource their manufacturing to other places in the world and rely on telecommunication to keep the marketing. The geographic distribution has changed significantly by reducing the distance it takes to complete an operation, due to information technology. These are just a couple of examples of how this advanced technology has reshape our society and continuing.
The history of the internet takes us back to the pioneering of the network and the development of capable technologies. The explosion of the internet’s popularity of the 1990’s was large and dramatic, boosting our economy and then helped to bring it into a major recession. One can only hope that the explosion becomes organized and slightly standardized in the interest of the general public. Despite all of these conjectures and speculations only time can tell the future of the largest network in the world.
This essay will explain both sides of the views and using critical thinking will uncover the real message the author intended to portray.
Technology will always continue to advance and doors will begin to open. In the text “Our Future Selves” by Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen they discuss as technology advances the positive outcome of connectivity. Greater connectivity will make the wold a better place because it will help the world be more efficient in sharing and discussing ideas and discoveries. Economically the world can find ways to enlarge their businesses and become more efficient to maximize profits. Sharing data is another advantage businesses can
The following essay is an attempt to critically compare and contrast these two approaches from various aspects, and deduce which one is more encompassing.
After researching the arguments given from both the opponents and proponents and analyzing the evidence each side has presented I will now dissect each sides reasonings to determine whether the evidence and arguments given are sound.
A network engineer must gather information such as projected traffic patterns and determine if there is a potential for bottlenecks. If this is the case, the design might require multiple communication paths to resources or the implementation of clustered servers with replicated data for load balancing. Also, the job functions of the clients must be studied. What are their jobs and work patterns and how does this affect the placement of servers, high-bandwidth links, and other physical components? Furthermore, a networ...
...y owned mega-networks. Servers will merge to form hyper-servers run on supercomputers. The number of ISPs will be considerably diminished.
The Internet has changed the way people interact with each other and entertain themselves. It has changed the way business is done. It has also changed the way people date, commit crime, and interview for jobs, it has even changed health care, among many other things. Technology and the Internet are not going away and the need for people to adapt is prominent. Internet is so prominent in Management Information systems. There are Internet based information systems. These systems are important because they can improve company efficiency. These systems can house data with extreme efficiency. Internet based information systems leave the possibilities of efficiency unlimited. Technology is only going to expand farther and new ways to communicate digitally will be introduced into businesses. It has already altered the way we interact with one another, and consumers to suppliers.