The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty

1379 Words3 Pages

What kind of crimes leads to the death penalty? Murder is what almost every state defines as capital punishment. If the death penalty is allowed, isn’t that define as murder too? What purpose does the death penalty serve or is it just an excuse? Regardless what kind of purpose it serves; a human life is taken away. It’s something that this country values and defines as wrongful. Allowing the death penalty means everyone is responsible for the life that’s been taken away.
Currently in the United States, there are19 states without the death penalty. Michigan abolished it in 1846 and Wisconsin in 1853. The most recent states to abolish it was Connecticut in 2012 and Nebraska 2015. On the website, “Death penalty information center,” a quote by …show more content…

In the article, “Death Penalty and Focus” it listed “From 2000-2007, there have been an average of 5 exonerations per year (1).” Since 1973, there have been a total of 151 death row exonerations in the USA. Some of the common causes of wrongful convictions are; government misconduct, eyewitness error, etc. What if a person was put down and then later it was found that that person was innocent? This is going to cause a lot of hurt and anger for the families of the person and the community. How is the system going to respond? Whatever they do, they can’t bring the person back. A life was taken away from that person’s will. It will just cost more …show more content…

A knife, needle, etc. Basically anything that can physically hurt a person. In this country, a human is not allow to physically hurt another human by any means. It is considered a crime. The news on television shows that any kind of physical harm to another is wrong. The methods that the system use to put someone on death row down are lethal injection, gas, electrocution, etc. Aren’t these considered weapons? Isn’t this label as harming a person? It is exactly that. The death penalty means we are allowing a human to hurt another human. The article, “Kill the Death Penalty: 10 Arguments Against Capital Punishment,” Brook stated, “With all of our advances in the sciences, sociology, psychology, education, technology, and so on, we should have more socially-effective, non-lethal, civilized techniques to punish (and rehabilitate) criminals, while protecting the rest of society” (1). A good example of this is having life imprisonment for the

Open Document