The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penalty
opinion Essay
1002 words
The Death Penalty
There are many debates over the problems of the death penalty, especially whether people who commit heinous crimes deserve the death penalty. Many western countries abolished this policy while some countries like China still carry out the death penalty. In present society, sometimes there are some heinous crimes happen, and the victims or their relatives think that imprisonment is not enough to punish the criminal. Debates occur in this case. However, many people do not agree with the death penalty due to sympathy for miscreant. Death penalty is very significant in that it relates to the criminal’s life in some cases and has many social impacts. The death penalty should be kept due to criminal’s introspection, deterrence for crime, humanitarianism and money.
There is an argument that the death penalty will give no chance for the criminal to introspect. Actually, we will find that the criminal who will receive the death penalty must have many sins, such as treason and first degree murder (Wiki).
…show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the death penalty should be kept due to criminal's introspection, deterrence for crime, humanitarianism, and money.
- Argues that the death penalty will give no chance for the criminal to introspect. han lei, who was sentenced to life imprisonment for theft, was arrested again in 2013.
- Opines that the death penalty can't stop criminal cases, since many criminals will consider the benefit and the loss before the crime.
- Argues that the death penalty does not conform to humanitarianism, and that it is crueler than death.
- Agrees that the death penalty should be kept because it can save a lot of money for the government.
- Concludes that the death penalty should be kept for miscreants because it is difficult for them to introspect because of the criminal record.
They consider that if an outlaw decides to kill someone, he will not care about paying a price, including his life. What I want to say is that not all people are outlaws. They will consider the benefit and the loss before the crime. Many criminals will give up the severe crime because they think it is not worth losing their lives. Also, the death warns the citizens not to commit a crime, or you will pay a price. For instance, the death penalty is very useful in China in that there are nearly 1.4 billion people in China, and the government must find a way to shock the people. Plus, the death penalty is a tradition in China, and it is commonly accepted by most Chinese people. The News shows that the number of criminals that deserve penalty becomes lower and lower from last ten years (NetEase), which means heinous crimes are fewer. We should keep the death penalty for
Related
- opinion
- analytical
- explanatory
- The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyopinion essay• Does the death penalty deter crime? If so, why are crime rates in the United States high compared to those in other nations? “The question of whether the death penalty is a more effective deterrent than long-term imprisonment has been debated for decades or longer by scholars, policy makers, and the general public” (Radelet & Lacock, 2009). When a defendant is convicted and sentenced to death, theoretically what follows is an execution.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the death penalty is a more effective deterrent than long-term imprisonment. the bureau of justice statistics reported that only 15% of people sentenced to death had been executed by the end of 2009.
- Argues that capital punishment deters individuals from committing murder. most people on death row committed their crimes in the heat of the moment, usually while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
- Explains that the united states has a higher murder rate than most western european nations that do not practice capital punishment. death sentences are racially discriminatory.
- Concludes that the american national academy of sciences national review council committee concluded that research on the effect of capital punishment on homicide is not informative.
- Opines that the death penalty should be legal and used when people are proven to be guilty with the more serious crimes.
- Opines that drug crimes are a serious problem but law enforcement will never be able to get drugs out of the streets.
- Explains that capital punishment protects society by preventing convicted individuals from committing another crime, including the murder of another inmate or prison official.
- Opines that capital punishment violates the eighth amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
- Explains that wrongful convictions can result from eyewitness misidentification, faulty forensic science, false confessions, government misconduct, informants, and inadequate legal counsel.
- Explains why youths who have been convicted of violent crimes should be subject to the death penalty. teenagers struggle to make good decisions, but their prefrontal cortex helps them think logically.
- Explains that the frontal lobe exercises restraint over impulsive behavior and when it is still in the process of maturing, it prevents adolescence from restraining themselves
- Explains that pre-mature prefrontal cortex impairs impulsivity and logical thinking, and affects risk management. poorly assessing risk may have underdeveloped regions.
- Explains the primary purpose of the juvenile justice system is to hold juvenile offenders accountable for delinquent acts while providing treatment, rehabilitative services, and programs designed to prevent future involvement in law-violating behavior.
- Opines that juveniles should only be tried as adults depending on the seriousness and type of offense and the manner in which it was committed; the sophistication and maturity of the juvenile determined by their home life, environment, emotional attitude, and pattern of living.
1128 wordsRead More - The Capital Punishmentopinion essayThe capital punishment or the death penalty is an action known to mankind since the binging of human civilization. It was sanction and legal and existed over the centuries. However, the look of modern punishment or penalty, no longer takes into account the seriousness of the facts from the trial by the accused, but also the impact it would have on the society in general and the accused, in particular, with careful thought as to whether the judgment is just or not. Especially, since every judgment is issued on behalf of the public will happen in the claims of preforming justice. It truly became a controversial topic which a single family can be torn and divided among its members. Jurists and legislators, as well, differed about retaining the death penalty for quit some time, which we can see reflected on various countries of the world. Some countries retained it, while we find some others who abolished it for all crimes except for specific ones such as war crimes. Some others, on the other hand, have kept it. An example of this is Saudi Arabia which is where I come from. In this paper I will argue for the capital punishment based on where I come from. I will talk about the advantages of capital punishments and the regulations that should be taken into considerations with this penalty.
In this essay, the author
- Argues for the capital punishment based on where they come from.
- Opines that the death penalty forms protection, order, and security in society.
- Opines that the death penalty ensures the right of the victims and their families.
- Opines that capital punishment should be limited to specific cases like terrorism, serial killing, pedophilia, etc.
- Opines that all family members have to agree on one decision. they suggest therapy and counselors for all the members where they can help them overcome their situation.
- Concludes that the death penalty is a deterrent, because people fear death, in result, it can minimize and restrain crimes like terrorism.
824 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayThe death penalty is the act of killing a person via the judicial system, and is meant as retribution for heinous crimes such as murder. The death penalty has been a source of controversy, raising many human rights and ethical questions. This controversy led to the death penalty being abolished when the United States Supreme Court suspended the death penalty in 1972 Furmen V Georgia. In 1976 the courts reinstated the death penalty and approved it constitutionally, as long as it was administered according to approved procedures. Today, the death penalty is being used as a form of punishment in about 58 countries. Peters, Jennifer (2001).
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the death penalty is the act of killing a person via the judicial system as retribution for heinous crimes such as murder.
- Argues that if the death penalty were abolished, there would be a rise in crime and increased amounts of homicides.
- Argues that the death penalty should be abolished for many reasons, such as wrongful convictions, inadequate legal representation, or police and prosecutor misconduct.
- Explains that there are other forms of execution that are prescribed and used in the united states of america, including electrocution, lethal gas, firing squad, and hanging.
- Explains that the cost of death is more expensive than that of keeping a person alive and imprisoned due to the sensitivity of the punishment.
- Opines that the death penalty is the most severe form of punishment and does nothing but turn us all into murderers.
1146 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayIn this paper I will ask three people four different questions about their views on the death penalty. The first question I asked was “Why do you feel the death penalty is wrong?” Question number two, “Does the death penalty help protect the public and discourage crime?” Question number three, “Do you consider the death penalty cruel and unusual?” The final question, “Is the death penalty economically justifiable and cost effective?”
In this essay, the author
- Explains that they will ask three people four different questions about their views on the death penalty.
- Interviews irven box, a 76-year-old attorney who has arrested, prosecuted, and defended people on various criminal offences.
- Analyzes how elise box, a 52-year-old legal secretary, answers questions differently from her first interview.
- Interviews shawn mcgill, a 40-year-old children's director at heritage baptist church, and asks her why she felt it was wrong and if it helped better the public and discourage crime.
- Explains that the three interviewees came from different backgrounds and have different educations. the only question that had different answers was the first one.
798 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyexplanatory essayThe technology and methods involved in state-run executions have evolved greatly over the years. For the first 150 years of the country’s existence, prisoners were executed either through hanging or by the firing squad. Electrocution became the standard method for executions until 1982, when lethal injection was used for the first time. According to Thomas Reuters “8 people were executed by electrocution, 1 by firing squad, and rest were executed by lethal injection“(“Facts About the Death Penalty”). In the US 31 states have the death penalty, and 19 states and DC abolished the death penalty.
In this essay, the author
- Explains the technology and methods involved in state-run executions have evolved greatly over the years. in the us 31 states have the death penalty, and 19 states and dc abolished it.
- Explains the danger of innocent people being executed because of errors in the criminal justice system. more than 150 men and women have been released from death row since the reinstatement.
- Explains that the americans' view on the death penalty is one of the most comprehensive studies ever piloted.
- Explains the five types of executions in the united states: hanging, firing squad, gas chamber, lethal injection, and the electric chair.
- Explains that the electric chair became popular in 1898, seeking a more humane method of execution than hanging. the inmate is strapped to the chair with heavy duty belts across the chest, groin, legs, and arms.
- Explains that nevada introduced the gas chamber in 1924, seeing a more human way of executing the states inmates.
- Explains the firing squad method, which started being a main execution method back in the late 1990's and early 2000’s. five shooters are armed with.30 caliber rifles loaded with single rounds.
- Explains that oklahoma became the first state to adopt lethal injection as an execution method in 1997.
- Recounts how clayton lockett, a 38-year-old male sentenced to the death penalty, shot stephanie neiman in 1999.
1246 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyexplanatory essay“I support the death penalty because I believe, if administered swiftly and justly, and capital punishment is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives”- George W. Bush (16 Pro, 2015). Everyone has different views on death penalty, whether they believe it is constitutional or unconstitutional. In some circumstances the issue can violate the eighth amendment. This amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments. The amendment is a “go to” source for the courts because it shapes the procedure for how the death is done, to determine if it fits the proportionality requirements. Being on death row, the court has to decide if it is considered a cruel and unusual punishment. They look at the objective factors and do
In this essay, the author
- States that they support the death penalty because they believe it is a deterrent against future violence and will save other innocent lives.
- Explains that lethal injection is the most common method of execution, and states that the justice system is to hold teenagers accountable for their actions.
- Explains that the eighth amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishment, the death penalty can be constitutional or unconstitutional.
- Explains that not everyone believes in the death penalty, as there are always two sides for everything. the inmates wait twelve years between their sentencing date and their execution date.
- Explains that the death penalty can be unconstitutional or constitutional depending on the view of congress and legislatures. there have been 35 executions since 2014.
1019 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayDeath penalty has always been a topic of controversy. Interchangeably known as capital punishment, death penalty legalizes the authorization to sentence the execution of a criminal. Controversy that rise from death penalty involve the notion of ethics and epistemology. Many people questions whether it is morally right to take another person’s life, tieing into the 8th amendment that prohibits people from suffering from a certain type of punishment. Another factor is that what exactly determines whether a person deserves execution or not. The justice system has the legal dilemma of properly determining to what extent of a crime committed is reprehensible enough to face death or if it is not as grave and more suitable with merely a life sentence.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the controversy surrounding the death penalty, stating that the 8th amendment prohibits people from suffering from a certain type of punishment.
- Explains that the supreme court, the legislative court and the families of both parties are involved in a death penalty case.
- Explains that each state or country has its preferred method of execution, but in the united states, lethal injection is most common.
- Explains that the death penalty remains an issue of discussion in the united states. dylann roof, a 57-year-old black man convicted of robbing and murdering, with 2 other accomplices, is being reconsidered due to mitigating factors.
- Explains that capital punishment was abolished in 1972 after the supreme court of george reviewed the case of furman v. georgia.
- Explains that although clemency is rare in death penalty cases, there are occasional ones.
- Explains that the controversy of death penalty isn't just in the united states, but other countries also have death penalties.
- Opines that the 8th amendment is vague and ambiguous, and that it is up to the country, state, or jury to decide which actions are most appropriate for the person who committed the crime.
2142 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayHaskins The Death Penalty The death penalty should be abolished because it is cruel and unusual punishment, it does not deter crime and it is costly. The death penalty is also known as capital punishment. This death by execution is ordered by the court to people convicted for a capital crime. Capital punishment is an issue that has been argued in the United States for years.
In this essay, the author
- Argues that the death penalty should be abolished because it is cruel and unusual punishment, does not deter crime, and is costly.
- Explains that the majority of americans are in favor of the death penalty but the numbers are declining.
- Argues that capital punishment is cruel and unusual punishment, but there is no evidence that it is a deterrent of crime.
- Explains that the cost of capital punishment is very expensive. death row inmates are housed in solitary confinement, which costs more than being placed in the general population.
- Explains that the justice system has made the mistake of taking the life of an innocent person.
- Explains that racial prejudice, insufficient legal representation, police misconduct, and pressure to solve the case are other reasons for being wrongfully convicted.
- Explains that lethal injection is the most commonly used method for the death penalty.
- Argues that the death penalty is a horrible, inhumane and uncivilized way to prosecute human beings, and it goes against the eight amendment to the united states constitution.
1360 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyexplanatory essayThe death penalty was around for many years, though we do not really hear much about it today. The death penalty was used as a way of punishment for committing the most serious crimes. This punishment was executed in various ways, all of them leading to the death of the person being executed. However, there are reasons why this punishment is no longer being used today.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that new york was the second state to carry out the most executions from 1608 to 1972, after virginia.
- Explains that the cost of the death penalty has increased dramatically due to the replacement of sodium thiopental with a more expensive substitute, pentobarbital.
- Opines that the death penalty is not proven to be a successful form of deterrence for crime.
- Explains that due to the high cost of the drugs used for lethal injection, us death row states turn to other substitute drugs that are less costly and this leads to various botched executions.
- Explains that the death penalty was used as a way of punishment for committing the most serious crimes, including drowning, burning alive, crucifixion, beating, and hanging.
- Explains that the death penalty was abolished and reinstated several times in new york until it was declared unconstitutional by the state's high court.
- Opines that the death penalty should be abolished everywhere, as it is a waste of money, time, and inhumane.
1590 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of The Death Penaltyanalytical essayAlbert Camus, a French-born author, journalist, and philosopher once wrote, “For centuries the death penalty, often accompanied by barbarous refinements, has been trying to hold crime in check; yet crime persists (Albert Camus Quotes). ” This might illustrate that even nowadays condemning people to death may not decrease crimes. The death penalty is a legal process whereby a person is put to death as a punishment for a crime. Some people argue that capital punishment is the easiest way to prevent people to commit murder.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that a life sentence without parole is cheaper than to execute criminals, and the judicial process to condemn them to death can take more than ten years.
- Argues that the death penalty should not be abolished because it is the best tactic to deter heinous crimes.
- Concludes that the death penalty should be abolished because innocent people could be condemned to die by mistake.
- Argues that the death penalty should be abolished because some innocent people could be condemned to die and a life sentence may be better.
- Explains the risk of executing innocent people has always existed in any justice system. a chicago tribune investigation revealed that texas may have executed an innocent man in 1989.
- Explains that deluna claimed that carlos hernandez killed wanda lopez, while liebman's investigation found that hernandez spent years saying that it was him and not his namesake and 'twin'
1300 wordsRead More