While ensuring sovereignty to individual states, the overwhelmingly weak initiative proved to endanger the nation as a rising democracy. Without a strong centralized government, the states’ loosely tied union resulted in a multitude of problems that contested the legitimacy of the nation as a new and free state. Shay’s Rebellion alone revealed the country’s inability to placate a legion of riled up debtors consisting of farmers. ** and also “ source that mentions that foreign threats were legitimate “ . ** Thus began the need for a new constitution .
In America, the states existed first, and they struggled to create a national government. Confideracy had been tried by the thirteen states under the Articles of confederation, and was found to be lacking, in that it did not provide adequate cohesiveness between the individual nation-states. The Articles of confederation establish a government but, limit the powers of the central government. This was a crucial flaw with the Articles of confederation, the central government had no power of national taxation, no power to control trade, and it provided for a comparatively weak executive. Therefore it could not enforce legislation or make states honor national obligations.
The Continental Congress controlled public affairs, but the Articles of Confederation neglected to grant the Congress power to enforce laws or unify the States. Under the Articles, the United States lacked a solid monetary system to ensure that taxes would be paid and to protect commerce, both nationally and foreign trade. Also, without leading national figure, the strong unity America gained during the Revolutionary War began to diminish along with the nations overall strength. Being that Congress had only the power to recommend actions to the states, the Articles were incompetent. Law and recommendations could not be further enforced by Congress.
How could the founding fathers save the Union and “secure the Blessing of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity?” (Constitution) They designed the constitution to rejected the democratic Articles to embrace a constitutional form of a republic government. So that the freedom of the people would be ensured by protecting their liberty from the corruptible nature of man. Any form of “Constitutional degeneration was the technical definition of ‘corruption’...corruption was the normal direction of constitutional change” ( Banning, 174) “Pride of independence deep and dangerous hold on the hearts of many of the state politicians” ( Bennett, 112) The leadership under the Articles at the state level was more democratic. However, was heading towards oligarchy, because these men who were in power often only concern themselfs with their own state, and competing with other states to benefit their state or goals. The politicians were using their power to .
...It is obvious that the Articles formed an ineffective government which is evident in Document H. It asks the question of whether the Articles should be revised or totally thrown out. The founding fathers felt that it was the best course of action to totally throw out the Articles, although it must be noted that the Articles were the basis for the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Articles, without a doubt, formed an unstable government which was destructive of markets, democracy, and life, and was impoverishing Americans. The effects are mostly rooted in the inability to recover from war debts. The strong central government was the only way to protect liberty while still having the ability to impose taxes.
As far as American people know, the Supreme Court is the representative of the law justice, upheld principle that all men are equal before the law in the case of United States v. Nixon. Nowadays, this case has already been a precedent to show that maybe everyone is not created equal, but people made the law to protect them to be equal. In addition, everyone cannot rely on the position of society standard or any exploits for avoiding the punishment of the law if they violate the law, including the president. So, United States v. Nixon is so important because it demonstrates that nobody or nothing will not be treated differently before the law, and the law is sacred that nobody could be above it, including the U.S president.
B. Overall justification: America wasn’t a world power, and thus it was a poor idea to provoke Britain and France. Also, war would have an extremely negative effect on the farmers and merchants which made up the party. IV. Democratic-Republican position’s impact on nation Constituencies of party were employed in the tasks of most of the nation (farming, mercantilism, etc.)
The New Jersey plan was introduced and was to protect the power of small states and it preferred a weak executive. The scopes of presidential power, veto power, relationship to congress are parts of the debates. “The national government had so little power to control the states that the confederation seemed to be but a ‘cobweb’. Congress did not even have the authority to regulate commerce among states”(page 5). Under the Articles of confederation, Congress had little or no power to regulate states, which led the country to a dire economic situation.
The central government lacked authority; the national government could not collect taxes or force states to comply with their laws. The lack of a strong central government made it difficult for states to operate effectively as one single nation. The state legislatures had too much power under the Articles, so Madison’s goal was to restrain the power of the states. Madison, Jay, and Hamilton, wrote the Federalist Papers to encourage the citizens to support the ratification of the Constitution. Federalist No.10 and No.