What Is Anita Hill's View Of Sexual Violence Against Women

1172 Words3 Pages

Women face myriad forms of violence today and throughout history. Both Anita Hill and Nafissa Diallo were forced to experience this violence in the form of sexual harassment and rape. Their cases did not follow the same pattern any other criminal case would, it turned into a circus of “he said, she said” for both women. Because of their intersectional identities as women of color etc., their evidence did not hold up against the evidence of the powerful men who wronged them. Sexual violence against women has long been an issue dominated by male opinions and decisions, and these examples only prove how ideologies surrounding sexual violence from far in the past are still in place today, disempowering women. In 1991, Clarence Thomas was Nominated …show more content…

She was taken to the hospital where they found injuries and DNA evidence of a sexual encounter between the two. The media rushed to the story, casting a negative light on Diallo and immediately trying to discredit her, “[There was a] media carnival accusing Nafi Diallo of prostitution, having HIV/AIDS, being undocumented, lying about her taxes, having unsavory friends…[they] provided graphic details, often exaggerated, of her biography” (Fine 9), the media was villainizing her, trying to prove her as an untrustworthy person so her rape could be discredited. It was advocated she go to trial, but eventually the charges were dropped as Diallo was found “not credible”. Strauss-Kahn eventually admitted they there was a sexual encounter between the two, but claimed it was consensual. Despite all the medical and forensic evidence against him, it became another case of “he said, she said”, as a powerful white politician from France, Strauss-Kahn 's evidence counted more than Diallo’s, a woman black asylum seeker from Guinea. Her intersectional identity as a black person, a woman, an immigrant, a poor woman, a single mother etc. has left her disempowered in a situation (that of sexual violence) that is controlled by …show more content…

Throughout her questioning she remained composed and consistent, providing the panel with eloquent answers to their questions. Hill chose to come forward, years after her harassment, because she knew it was the right thing to do. She provided the public with a depiction of a composed and educated black woman standing up against sexual violence, a depiction that was new to much of the American public. Diallo however, became a scapegoat in the media, with rumors of her sexual promiscuity, bad morals, untrustworthiness etc. being circulated. She was portrayed as a sexually and morally deviant black woman, which is a very common stereotype

Open Document