The Pros And Cons Of Rapid Climate Change

1072 Words3 Pages

In the article by Scott G. McNall (2010). Rapid Climate Change: What is to be done? The author discusses the issues of the rapid climate changes globally, that are effecting the entire earth with the warming of the Northern and Southern poles, the melting of the ice causing permafrost and methane gas to be released into the atmosphere. The author notes that, it is important that the global community understands the critical problem that is gradually destroying the earth with rapid climate changes. I will assessed the writer’s dialogue and acknowledge the writer as the author, in the following assessments, (1. Precision, (2. Citations and References, (3. Comparisons and Contrast, (4. Points of views of advantages and disadvantages, (5. Supported opinions, (6. Alternative views and arguments, (7. The Assumption of the article, (8. The Consequences of Reasoning, (9. The main point of view, (10. Conclusion. The …show more content…

But to make a better case, using the data and evidence that is presented by world renowned agencies, such as the National Geographical Society, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and the United States Department on Global Climate Change Agency, would be more preferable for more in-depth research. I have reviewed the article Rapid Climate Change: What is to be done? By Scott G. McNall (2010) and I have assessed it in the approaches of precision, citations and references, comparisons and contrast, points of views of advantages and disadvantages, supported opinions, alternative views and arguments. The author was also assessed by the assumption of the article along with the consequences of reasoning, the author’s main point of view and on how that the author could have presented a stronger

More about The Pros And Cons Of Rapid Climate Change

Open Document