The Pros And Cons Of Privatization Of Health Care

1085 Words3 Pages

Every countries’ governments seek to deliver high quality health care and reasonable cost to all citizens. However, all nations have not equality health care service and reasonable cost. Canada government provides equality health care services and public facilities to the citizens. However, Canada Health Care System has been the subject of controversies compared to the United States Health Care System. Some people may agree with the idea because people should not wait longer for surgeries or examinations, patients have high quality of medicals and better services. However, if change the health care system, Canada government cannot intervene in the health care system, Canada citizens pay higher medical cost and do not get equality services. …show more content…

Hospitals and insurance companies want to earn money. Hospital cost will expensive to citizens. According to Ed cooper and Liz Taylor (1994), Provide by the provincial governments through taxes to patients free to choose doctors and physicians on a fee for service basis. Compared to Unite State, the government does not have a purposeful health care system. Therefore, hospitals make marketing for their business profits and charge to citizens smaller pay because uninsured and reduced fees by large payers. Furthermore, Private Health Insurances cost will expensive to citizen. According to Odette, under the Canada Health Act, the provinces provide publicly insured, but except dental care, cosmetic surgery and additional hospital room amenities not covered by their provincial plan. Therefore, Canada private health insurance are not expensive compared to US. Consumer Reports said (2014), US private health insurances are getting expensive because insurances dose not fully protect to citizens and people want to get premiums health insurance for their coverage. The cost of health care in the US is the highest per person in the industrialized world and growing the fastest. Last, Cooper, Taylor (1994) said, “Financial incentives encourage expensive high-tech diagnosis, treatment, and specialization; there is not enough primary care” (paragraph 8). Hospitals and doctors want to easy to cure and does not want to see many …show more content…

Elaine Bernard (n.d) observes, “All Canadians, rich and poor, regardless of state of their health, age, or employment status, are covered by the same comprehensive system.” (Paragraph 7). However, if change the health care system in Canada, Poor people cannot go to hospital. Canada health care provide equality healthcare to poor people and rich people. However, if change the health care system, people should have some insurance of health coverage or have a lot of money. For example, when I visited in Philippines for three months, I went to a hospital because of stomach ache. I received a treatment fast, but a woman still waiting a doctor with hold her son. The boy was bleeding head because he got a car accident. However, doctors refuse to cure the boy because a mother did not have money. Doctors and hospitals want to accept rich people and move to rich place. The US physicians are disappeared in low-income areas instead move into high-income areas for the wealthiest and privately funded patients (Cooper, Taylor, 1994). Increase medical services gap between rich and poor. Rich people want to get premium services and high quality doctors and medicines. However, poor people cannot provide primary health care because doctors move to rich place. According to Health Insurance (2016), four-fifths of all Americans have private health insurance, but a sizable people cannot

Open Document