More handpicked essays just for you.
Successful accomplishments by Donald Trump
Successful accomplishments by Donald Trump
Successful accomplishments by Donald Trump
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Successful accomplishments by Donald Trump
President Trump has been successful in fulfilling his promise to combat radical Islamic terrorism. Coalition forces have dropped more weapons in March 2017 targeting ISIS than any other month since the Operation Inherent Resolve started in August 2014 (Woody, 2017). According to statistics from the Air Forces Central Command, coalition forces dropped 10,918 weapons within the first three months of 2017, approximately 60% more weapons dropped than the first three months of 2016 under the Obama administration (Combined Forces, 2017). With more weapons dropped, ISIS will not only continue losing its senior leaders and territory, but also its command and control. In April, the most powerful non-nuclear bomb in the U.S. military’s arsenal targeted
Immigration has always been a hot topic in America. There are many pros and cons, which makes it a delicate issue when it comes to debates. In an attempt to reform immigration, President Obama has issued an executive order that will overhaul the nation’s immigration system as we know it. The president’s changes will affect nearly 11 million undocumented immigrants who are currently residing in America. Focusing on 4 main changes, Obamas’ plan focuses on many aspects from enhancing border security to developing new processes in which workers can enter the country.
It is obvious the Republican Party has no brains. If they elect Donald Trump to run for president, they are going to lose big time. They can blame themselves for being so stupid. The establishment runs the Republican Party. They are the ones who lose major elections. The leadership of the Republican Party shifts the blame to conservative wing of the Republican Party; however, it is the moderate wing of the Republican Party who loses elections. Does John McClain ring a bell? If the Republican Party hopes to win the presidency, they must run a conservative or face another trouncing in the next election. It is that simple. Therefore, the Republicans had better wake up fast if they want to
Byman’s first argument is that US drone strikes are extremely efficient in their purpose: eliminating high value targets in foreign countries that pose a threat to national security. He cities a study done by the New America Foundation, which found that “U.S. drones have killed an estimated 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban, and other jihadist operatives in Pakistan and Yemen” (Byman 1). Of these 3,300 militants, over 50 were senior leaders of either Al Qaeda or the Taliban. Additionally, drone strikes indirectly hinder communication between terrorist leaders and their operatives. In an effort to avoid detection, many foreign militants have stopped using cell phones and other electronic forms of communication. Although the elimination of technology makes it harder to find high value targets, it also significantly impacts their ability to communicate, which reduces the amount of organized attacks. Without considering the cost of civilian casualties or other negative impacts associated with the drone strikes, it is clear that UAV drones have been effective in eliminating foreign threats.
The Obama Administration did maintain the policy of Bush 43 of using massive troops, such as the Afghan surge in 2009 but steadily reverted to the draconian measure of using drones. The arrivals of Hagel and Brennan, in agreement with VP Biden’s view, earlier this year made a better case for this change from counterinsurgency to counterterrorism (NYT’s “In Step on ‘Light Footprints’, Nominees Reflect A Shift”). This is where there is a departure from Bush 43. This is not to assert that the use of the aforementioned are unquestionably productive since they tend to produce ...
In spectacularly calloused fashion, the Trump administration recently announced the termination of the Obama-era Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, or DACA. With thousands of hard-earned collegiate degrees, blossoming careers and immeasurable amounts of gratitude and patriotism, DACA recipients have inspired the successes of future generations. Yet, with the stunning overconfidence of a seasoned gambler and the bumbling inexperience of an amateur, President Trump may have just jeopardized the futures of thousands of dreamers and America’s identity, gratifying his own electoral base through the destruction our nation’s identity.
Since the economic crises of the 1970’s great shift in economic policy and ideology has occurred in several western countries, Particularly the united states. In the 1980’s under the lead of Ronald Wilson Reagan the president of the united states (1981-1989) the government undertook a series of reforms which greatly affected the economic outlook on not only the US but the world. The movement which determined this shift in policy is often referred to as neo-conservatism, and the people who make up this movement are called neo-conservatives. Neo-conservatism is seen as a fantasy in modern politics. For its opponents it is a distinct political movement that emphasizes the blending of military power with Wilsonian idealism (Mearsheimer 2005), however for its supporters it is seen as a ‘persuasion’ that individuals of many types drift into and out of (Kristol 1995: ix). Regardless of which view is correct, it is now
Donald Trump is a highly successful business titan, real estate mogul, reality television personality, and now a 2016 presidential candidate. Since announcing his candidacy this past June, he has been very loquacious on his views pertaining to foreign policy. He takes a very realist approach when addressing these issues. His views are very much in line with the belief that the international political arena is not dominated by altruistic ideologies, but rather nation-states that are self-interested. His foreign policy platform centers on using hard power to achieve America’s goals in the Middle East and to eradicate illegal immigration.
There are two category’s in today’s society Those who oppose illegal immigration and want the immigrants to be forced back to their originating countries. Those who oppose illegal immigration but would prefer that illegal immigrants that reside within the United States are granted citizenship options. There are obviously quite a number of people that are opposed to illegal immigration. Almost all of us can say we are children of immigrants Many immigrants risk their lives to reach the United States so that they may provide their families a better life. Some immigration supporters also feel that the risks the immigrants take to get here are far too great. They feel the United States government is placing these individual 's lives at risk by
Republicanism is different from other forms of democracy as it defines itself based on the fact people have fundamental rights that cannot be taken away by a majority of voters. The founding of republicanism in America seemed to be the true beginning of who we are and what we have become today. When settlers decided to come to America instead of staying in Britain it was based on the idea that America was a blank slate. They could make it whatever they wanted it to be. Base it on whatever beliefs and ideologies they chose. The Americans believed that republic would be the form of government that would be less likely to become corrupted. During the Revolutionary War, the leaders of America soon realized that, in order to function as a whole bodied nation, the United States needed a government that would protect the rights and goals of citizen’s from
Immigration reform has been one of the “hot” topics that have been consistently at the forefront of many American discussions. At this time, there are more illegal immigrants in our country than legal immigrants. This is a major controversy in the realm of other social policies. Illegal immigration, or undocumented immigrants, refers to foreign people entering the United States without government permission or violating the immigration law. This is typically done by sneaking into the country or staying beyond the allotted time frame.
The United States of America started out as a haven for refugees and immigrants. A place, The New World, where people came to escape persecution in their home countries. Some came to America seeking a refuge from political persecution, others were escaping religious persecution, others just wanted a new place to start their lives again with a clean slate, others still came as slaves and prisoners expelled from home to go and survive in the wilderness of the new world or die all together (Haines xi).
In 1992, Ross Perot declared during the 1992 presidential campaign that if implemented, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) would create a “giant sucking sound” of jobs going south to cheaper labor markets of Mexico. Granted, Perot heard the sound, however, he missed the market. In June 2007, Candidate Obama conceded the failings in NAFTA subsequently as President; he endeavors using the invisible hand of geopolitics by drawing Japan closer through the Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPP). In the process, he isolates the true “sound” of China’ comparative advantage by upgrading existing standards (NAFTA) and setting new high standards (TPP) that includes forty percent of the global economy. However, Thomas Sowell in Applied Economics:
As the source states, liberalism emphasizes heavily upon the will of the people, meaning that at its core, liberalism is only viable as an ideology until illiberal acts become the will of the people. There are often times when the people within a liberal society call for illiberal acts, often relating to security, economic equality, and social programs. Each of these are often debated upon, and acs are created in relation to it for the benefit of the people, yet they render liberalism unviable. When the viability is assessed using the reasoning discussed in the source, liberalism is no longer viable when the will of the people, and their betterment, is illiberal.
As both "conservatism" and "liberalism" have had various meanings sooner or later and transversely countries, the word liberal conservatism has been used in relatively different sanity. In political science, the word is used to pass on to ideologies that merge the support of capitalism, for instance value for contracts, protection of private property and free market require reference to validate with the principle in natural discrimination, the significance of religion, and the worth of traditional integrity need reference to validate in the course of a construction of inadequate, legitimate, representative government (Abdou & Zaazou 2013). It contrasts with traditional liberalism and particularly aristocratic conservatism, rejecting the belief of correspondence as a little in discordance with human nature, instead emphasizing the thought of natural inequality (Crozier. 2012).As the conservative thought in democratic countries hold typical liberal institutions such as the rule of law, private property, market economy, and constitutional representative government, the liberal factor of liberal conservatism
The drawbacks and criticisms faced by Trump and his administration was substantial and swift. Prominent interest advocacy groups such as United We Dream, an organization that supports and empower undocumented people to develop their leadership, organizing, advocacy and lobbying abilities to fight for justice and dignity for immigrants through youth led campaigns at the local, state, and federal level, said in a statement, “with this move, Trump is fulling a sick white supremacist scheme to terrorize young people of color. But make no mistake – we will not be pushed into the shadows by these racist politicians. This is our home and we are here to stay” (Christina Jimenez, United We Dream). The American Civil Liberties Union an interest and advocacy