The Pros And Cons Of Open Adoption Research In Social Work

Open adoption is not a new topic in Social Work, but the desire of seeking why it is necessary has become important as the rise of openness continues to escalate. Open adoption began to rise in the 20th century. Most research points to the conclusion that open adoption is becoming more beneficial. It is a common belief in adoption research that if this cycle continues to rise, it can set new boundaries on the adoption triangle. Since open adoption consists of the expansion of families, it also sets a goal of redefining kinship. A standard family usually consists of the norm: father, mother, and their children, but when combining birth and adoptive relatives a child now has to adjust to having two mothers and two fathers. This literature review showcases several data used while researchers conducted studies on finding out about kinship in an open adoption and the pros and cons of open adoption. The results of the listed studies indicate that the

Both birth and adoptive parents have to be willing to cooperate so that a healthy relationship is formed. Commitment is another aspect that is required. If all parties agree on carrying out this process, commitment has to be solid and consistent so that the adoptees will not have inconsistency and confusing growing up. Counseling should be another factor to consider so the birth parents can release any grief and regrets they have had and feel better about the decision they made. Open adoption is something that can impact the adoptee’s life: emotionally and mentally. The old-fashioned practice of how Americans and many other societies view adoption have significantly changed. Brodzinsky (2011) collaborates on connections made by adoptees as he analyzed and collected data on communicative and structural openness in during adoption experiences. Every single adoption experience, regardless of the level of openness, presents distinct opportunities and