The Pros And Cons Of NAFTA

652 Words2 Pages

In 1992, Ross Perot declared during the 1992 presidential campaign that if implemented, NAFTA (North American Free Trade Agreement) would create a “giant sucking sound” of jobs going south to cheaper labor markets of Mexico. Granted, Perot heard the sound, however, he missed the market. In June 2007, Candidate Obama conceded the failings in NAFTA subsequently as President; he endeavors using the invisible hand of geopolitics by drawing Japan closer through the Transpacific Partnership Agreement (TPP). In the process, he isolates the true “sound” of China’ comparative advantage by upgrading existing standards (NAFTA) and setting new high standards (TPP) that includes forty percent of the global economy. However, Thomas Sowell in Applied Economics: …show more content…

Schott, experts at the Peterson Institute for International Economics and the authors of NAFTA Revisited disclosed, “NAFTA was designed to promote economic growth by spurring competition in domestic markets and promoting investment from both domestic and foreign sources." Consequently, with foreign investors growing progressively agitated with the freedom of competition inside China, regardless, the invisible hand effect of NAFTA has US workers’ wages at a pace below labor productivity. Mohammed Aly Sergie writing for the CFR in NAFTA's Economic Impact discloses Alden alternately proclaiming, “Income inequality in the United States has risen in recent years, in part due to pressures on the U.S. manufacturing base.” Will the TPP level the playing field for American workers and American businesses towards a comparative advantage? History indicates to listen for the sucking sound for marginal benefit

Open Document