The Pros And Cons Of NAFTA
analytical Essay
2266 words
Introduction
Free trade is a policy that lifts all trade tariffs and barriers and thus encouraging the free movement of goods (imports and exports) between nations. Agreements to free trade establish free markets where countries can engage in trade in a free and conducive environment. This type of trade is made possible by free trade agreements made between countries. According to the International Trade Administration, these agreements help minimize barriers to exports form the US, protect their interests as well as enhance the rule of law in member countries. NAFTA is one of such agreements.
Free trade comes with its share of pros and cons. It is responsible for increased economic growth, better business environments, encourages investment
…show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Explains that nafta had its consequences that affected the three countries, though not in equal measure.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement (nafta) was negotiated and put into force by the us, canada and mexico in january 1994.
- Explains that nafta was the first bilateral trade agreement between the us and canada.
- Analyzes the gdp of the us, canada and mexico before nafta (in billions of dollars).
- Analyzes the gdp of the us, canada and mexico after nafta (in billions of dollars).
- Analyzes how the gdp of the three countries rose considerably before nafta was enacted, but the agreement impacted on them differently.
- Explains that trade between the us and its nafta partners increased considerably after this trade agreement. canada and mexico accounted for 34% of all us exports.
- Explains that nafta helped the auto industry become globally competitive by helping it develop its supply chains and outsource its manufacturing work.
- Explains that free trade is a policy that lifts all trade tariffs and barriers and encourages the free movement of goods between nations.
- Explains how nafta improved trade conditions for mexico, canada, and the us. market opening measures led to removal of tariffs and quotas on imports from mexico.
- Explains that the us, canada and mexico became stakeholders of the nafta after it was enacted and passed into law.
Some of the consequences of free trade as seen in the case of NAFTA include outsourcing of jobs to other countries, crowding out of domestic industries, poor working conditions among others. NAFTA led to shifts in jobs and production to Mexico as a result of free trade (Villareal & Fergusson, 2015). It has also been blamed for stagnation of wages in the US because of people moving to work in Mexico and Canada and companies also moving there because of the low production costs. According to the centre for Economic and policy research, a surge of imports lead to the US loosing 600,000 jobs in only two decades (Villareal & Fergusson, 2015). In Mexico, the trade is estimated to have put two million workers out of work due to agriculture that is highly subsidized by the US. This then led to increased rates of immigration into the US as people searched for better means of living (Weisbrot et al, 2014). Canada did not suffer any extreme effects as result of NAFTA. However, the productivity gap between itself and the US economy was not closed because its labour productivity remained at 72% as that of US levels (Villareal & Fergusson, …show more content…
Figure 2: GDP of the US, Canada and Mexico after NAFTA (in billions of dollars).
YEAR USA CANADA MEXICO
1992 $702.34 $592.40 $363.61
1994 $711.56 $578.14 $527.32
1996 $699.93 $628.59 $397.40
1998 $850.32 $631.81 $502.01
2000 $1,089 $742.90 $683.65
2002 $1,105 $758 $741.56
2004 $1,356 $1,023 $770.27
2006 $1,398 $1,315 $965.28
Source: Compiled from Centre for Economic Policy Report and International Trade Administration.
Related
- analytical
- opinionated
- NAFTA: The North American Free Trade Agreementanalytical essayThroughout history, the United States has initiated policies, peace agreements, or laws which were believed to bring prosperity, and success, however those policies as a result were created in the U.S. best self-interest. One of these policies is known as NAFTA, which was a trade agreement created to open up free trade around the globe, however this policy backfired, deeply scaring and deteriorating the Latin American economy, and its people. Specifically, NAFTA known as the North American Free Trade Agreement, took effect on January 1, 1994 was a treaty which entered by the United States, Canada, and Mexico used to eliminate tariff barriers, in order to encourage economic prosperity between these three countries. A quarter century later, the
In this essay, the author
- Explains that nafta, a trade agreement between the united states, canada, and mexico, has brought wealth to the 1st world developed countries, but its aftermath has affected millions of people in the western hemisphere.
- States that the north american free trade agreement was intended to ease trade on imports and exports, by eliminating tariff barriers, in order to encourage competition and venture opportunities.
- Analyzes how the impact of the north american free trade agreement has resulted in a decrease in quality of living, unemployment and poverty.
- Analyzes how the effects of nafta have directly impacted the socioeconomic structure of mexico.
1078 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of NAFTAanalytical essayWhen thinking about North American and its countries it is hard not to think about the North American Free Trade Agreement. Well, it may be easy to not think about but of this essay let just say that everyone thinks about it. This trade agreement was implanted over 20 years ago and the affects of this agreement are still being talked about today. This agreement is being talked about because of the numerous criticisms it has received since in was enacted in 1994. Where the agreement was actually beneficially is not the main topic of discussion. In this essay, it will examine the main criticism of NAFTA and tried to explain how they came to be. The main argument is that NAFTA is more known for its criticism then what is has done to create better trade among its members.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the north american free trade agreement has been criticized since it was enacted in 1994. the main argument is that nafta is more known for its criticism than what it has done to create better trade among its members.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement (nafta) was a trilateral free-trade deal that came into being in january 1994.
- Opines that nafta will create more jobs than it destroys. the current trade surplus between the u.s. and mexico was simulated based on the overvaluation of the mexican peso.
- Opines that nafta was criticized for its impact on the mexican economy and promises made when it was created, but it created an open and free trade network between the u.s., canada and mexico.
- Analyzes how nafta's impact on mexico has been a source of disagreement on the success of the trade agreement.
1323 wordsRead More - NAFTA and Mexicoanalytical essayMexico’s economy is undergoing a stunning transformation. Seven years after the launch of the North American Free Trade Agreement, it is fast becoming an industrial power. Free trade with the U.S. and Canada is turning the country from a mere assembler of cheap, low-quality goods into a reliable exporter of sophisticated products from auto breaks to laptops computers. Although Mexico has seen economic growth lately, it still faces tremendous problems in the aftermath of the 1995 recession and the revolution that took place in the Chiapas which still wages on today. The purpose of this paper is to explore the effects that NAFTA has had on the economy and it’s people during the implementation of NAFTA and in what NAFTA will bring in the future.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that nafta was the last straw for the indigenous people of chiapas. their revolt was inspired by five centuries of oppression and injustice.
- Analyzes how decentralized production implies a decomposition of the industrial working class to include more marginal workers and, especially, more women. the invisibility of workers makes them politically, if not economically, marginal.
- Explains lemco, jonathan, and robson, william. ties beyond trade: labor and environmental issues under the nafta.
- Opines that the president, the peso, market and those indians. the economist 24 dec 1994: 43.
- Analyzes the impact of the north american free trade agreement on mexico's economy and its people.
- Explains that the zapatistas feared the nafta would worsen their debilitating problems. they knew the treaty would affect them personally.
- Analyzes the impact of the north american free trade agreement on mexico's environment. the impoverished border region is known for poor drinking water, inadequate sewage treatment, and mass squatter settlements.
- Introduces lourdes beneria and shelley feldman in unequal burden.
- Describes the letters and communiques of subcomandante marcos and the zapatista army of national liberation.
3032 wordsRead More - NAFTA: Not for Americaanalytical essayAmerica’s economy is flat lining. We are bleeding jobs and hemorrhaging revenue. One out of every seven citizens is on financial life support and our government needs to do something stat. One of the first steps in the road to recovery is repealing the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA, because it is dangerous to our economic stability and future.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that repealing the north atlantic free trade agreement, or nafta, is dangerous to america's economic stability and future.
- Explains that nafta took effect on january 1, 1994 with the culmination of all quota and tariff repeals on jan 1, 2008. it was designed to expand trade between canada, mexico, and the united states by reducing restrictions imposed by tariffs and encouraging foreign direct investment in the developing economies.
- Opines that some goals have been achieved since nafta's passing; mexican exports have greatly risen, certain individuals and corporations have made record breaking profits, and relations have improved between mexico and canada.
- Explains that nafta has changed the government-banking dynamic, contributed to the outsourcing of hundreds of thousands of jobs from the united states, driven wages down, reduced tax revenue in america while costing billions of dollars, and increased america's trade deficit by billion.
- Analyzes how nafta brought about changes by rescinding a 1973 law to protect american companies and investors by prohibiting investment and quotas on key mexican markets. foreign investors capitalized on the opportunity to integrate themselves into mexico's commercial banking system.
- Argues that the most notable change has been in terms of lost employment for americans. between 1994 and 2002, 897,000 american jobs were outsourced to mexico.
- Explains that as jobs are funneled out of america into less regulated mexico, the jobs that do remain pay less. average weekly wages dropped from $800 to $683 which added up to $7.6 billion in outsourced wages.
- Explains that nafta has widened the gap between the poorest and richest members of society in america and mexico.
- Explains that wages have been driven down and environmental and worker protection efforts negatively affected as resources and labor are exploited to maximize profits for the wealthy.
- Argues that american taxpayers pay approximately $19 billion annually in subsidies to mexico, effectively paying to undercut themselves.
- Explains that when people lose their livelihood, they are forced to look for alternatives -- work for nothing in substandard working conditions or try to make it out of the country and illegally immigrate to the united states in hopes of creating a better life.
- Explains that americans are losing mexican interest as an export venue, but mexicans are proud to be expanding their share of the global market.
- Explains that america's exports to mexico are down 36 percent, while our import growth has expanded 50 percent. this has greatly contributed to our ever expanding trade deficit by $107.3 billion or $21 billion annually.
- Explains that china and mexico are expanding their mutual trade horizons at an unprecedented rate. china's weak peso is offsetting higher transportation costs and increased chinese labor costs. mexico wants to eliminate its dependence on america.
- Opines that it is no longer financially sound for america to support nafta, especially when mexico isn't interested in maintaining america as a key market.
- Explains salas, faux, and scott's "revising nafta: still not working for north america’s workers."
1342 wordsRead More - The Expansion of The North American Free Trade Agreementopinionated essayThe North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) entered into force on January 1, 1994. It created the world's largest free trade area: 380 million people producing nearly $8 trillion worth of goods and services. One of NAFTA's primary objectives is to, "contribute to the harmonious development and expansion of world trade and provide a catalyst to broader international cooperation" (US Trade Rep.). To ensure its role in advancing world trade NAFTA must expand its boundaries to the Caribbean as well as Central and South America.
In this essay, the author
- States that the north american free trade agreement (nafta) entered into force on january 1, 1994. it created the world's largest free trade area.
- Explains that twenty trade agreements have been negotiated within the hemisphere without us participation. the eu has agreed to sign a free trade agreement with the nations of mercosur.
- Opines that it would be a great failure for the us not to take the lead in negotiating this trade pact.
- Concludes that market integration has produced more jobs than lost due to nafta.
- Opines that nafta will stimulate democratic advancements in latin america and the caribbean, where 19 of 20 nations have established institutions of democracy.
- Opines that it is time for the us to end a tiresome debate and step forward to lead the western hemisphere to global economic prosperity
- Recommends that the us take part in leading the western hemisphere into agreement in the ftaa by merging nafta, mercosur, caricom, and the andean region.
- Explains solis, luis. peace equation: the need for further regional cooperation.
- States that the expansion of nafta into central and south america will benefit us trade by reducing tariffs in one of the fastest growing regions in the world.
- Explains that us trade with canada and mexico has grown 44 percent since nafta was signed, compared with 33 percent for the rest of the world. the us must look to the western hemisphere for further economic prosperity.
- Cites clinton, bill, herman, alexis, king, robin, and maises naim. "free trade express?" the future of hemisheric intergration.
1703 wordsRead More - NAFTAopinionated essayNAFTA Since the beginning of civilization, trade has been an important issue. Christopher Columbus sailed to the Americas in search of a faster and safer trade route to India. We as Americans fought for our independence over trade related issues, such as tariffs and rules on with whom we were allowed to export and import goods. Our people have always fought for the rights and ability to buy and sell what they want at a reasonable price.
In this essay, the author
- Explains nafta's advantages and disadvantages, including the ability to do something more efficiently with less labor or resources than another country.
- Opines that nafta has not helped the job market in the u.s. or mexico.
- Explains that american factories are moving across the mexican border where the rules and environmental standards are more slacked, while americans are losing jobs and have a trade deficit with mexico.
- Opines that mexico's maquiladora factories will have to become more spaced out, creating more jobs and raising the wages of mexican workers.
- Explains that they have always had a negative opinion of nafta, but they were surprisingly reaffirmed in their previous opinion.
- Explains the purpose of the north american free trade agreement (nafta) in article 102: objectives.
- Argues that nafta has enriched international corporations, but it hasn't brought much benefit to workers or the environment. the us has lost 766,000 jobs due to the agreement, while mexico has seen a nearly 21% drop in manufacturing wages.
- Opines that nafta has done more harm or good since its implementation. the us trade surplus with mexico quickly turned into a deficit, and at least half-million jobs have been lost.
- Describes the key points to remember regarding the north american free trade agreement.
- Explains the north american free trade agreement (nafta): deepening economic integration and resposes to competition.
2320 wordsRead More - Pros And Cons Of NAFTAanalytical essayThe North American Free Trade Agreement—NAFTA—was an important agreement signed between three countries—the U.S., Mexico and Canada. NAFTA played an important role between each of these countries’ relations with one another through imports and exports. Throughout the presidential elections throughout the years, NAFTA has been highly debated on whether or not it has helped benefit the economy of these countries or if it has caused a lot detrimental issues. NAFTA promised many benefits for these countries, but not all of their promises were carried through; many views across the political spectrum also have their indifferences about NAFTA.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement (nafta) was an important agreement signed between the u.s., mexico and canada.
- Explains that nafta was signed in 1994 with the goals of eliminating tariffs, promoting free trade and bringing mexico out of poverty and decreasing the immigration numbers.
- Explains that the clinton administration envisioned that nafta would create high-wage u.s jobs that would help expand businesses and the economy.
- Explains that mexico's economy was unstable and unfair in comparison to the u.s. and canada’s economic standing. the overvalued peso in mexico caused many problems economically.
- Explains that mexican workers were making it difficult for american citizens to get a job because many companies favored cheap labor. nafta created more job opportunities for many people.
- Analyzes mckee's argument that the u.s. economy has gained 30 million jobs since 1993, but many of those jobs were ones that didn't pay well nor did they offer work benefits and protections.
- Analyzes how mexico's maquiladora plants imported materials, assembled them and re-exported them to the u.s., but the only benefit was the creation of jobs. nafta defenders recognized the flaws of the agreement.
- Explains that nafta was successful because there was an increase in trade between three countries, which caused mexican exports to the u.s. to increase by 14 percent.
- Explains that mexico's trading relationship with the u.s. was important, but it also hurt its economy.
- Analyzes how bernie sanders viewed nafta's impact as negative by witnessing poor working conditions and low wage pay in mexico. he also observed that american chain companies laid off many u.s. workers to seek low-wage labor.
- Analyzes how donald trump doesn't support nafta and plans to redirect the u.s. in a different direction.
- Explains that nafta was supposed to help benefit the u.s., mexico and canada, but it did the opposite. the benefits didn't amount to any real changes in improving the economy.
1531 wordsRead More - A Discussion of the Negative Impact of NAFTA on North Americaanalytical essayA Discussion of the Negative Impact of NAFTA on North America The North American Free Trade Agreement was passed in November of 1993 and went into effect on January 1, 1994. The agreement aimed to eliminate tariffs between Canada, Mexico and the United States, leading to the eventual creation of free trade among these three countries by the year 2008. Supporters of NAFTA billed the agreement as a wonderful opportunity to create jobs, stimulate competition, and free North America from harsh and often unfair tariffs that restricted trade between the three nations. From a theoretical perspective, NAFTA appeared to have the makings of a highly beneficial relationship between Canada, Mexico and the United States.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes salas, carlos, the impact of nafta on wages and incomes in mexico.
- Analyzes the economic and social impact of the north american free trade agreement on mexico, canada, and the united states.
- Argues that nafta has played a major role in the modernization of mexico. while free trade benefits mexican relations with the us, it fails to translate over to the global economy.
- Explains that nafta has created lopsided trade industries and substantial dependencies in mexico, canada and the united states.
- Argues that nafta cannot be solely blamed for the economic downturn facing mexico, canada and the united states.
2934 wordsRead More - The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)analytical essayThe North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), came into effect on January 1, 1994, creating the largest free trade region in the world, generating economic growth and helping to raise the standard of living for the people of all three countries participating. By strengthening the rules and procedures governing trade and investment, the NAFTA has shown to be a great base for adding to Canada’s prosperity and has set a valuable example of the benefits of trade liberalization for the rest of the world. NAFTA was designed with many economic results in mind. Hopes were that not only trade would be easier, cheaper, and easier for all countries involved, but economic wealth and growth would follow. The support for NAFTA was spilt among the citizens of Canada, half saw the potential, while the rest seeing it to have a terrible effect on Canadian employment. Roughly 20 years has past since putting this agreement in place, and the NAFTA agreement has proven to been a mixed blessing for this country.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how the north american free trade agreement has impacted the imports and exports of goods to canada positively.
- Explains that canada has benefited directly from nafta as every one in five jobs are linked to international trade.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement (nafta) created the largest free trade region in the world, generating economic growth and raising the standard of living for all three countries participating.
- Analyzes how the north american free trade agreement has benefited canada as it has increased investments. the agreement lowers risk for foreign investors as they are given the same protection as local or domestic investors.
1359 wordsRead More - The Problems with NAFTA Not Helping Economiesopinionated essayThe Problems with NAFTA Not Helping Economies "The free trade argument states that, if each nation produces what it does best and permits trade, over the long run all will enjoy lower prices and higher levels of output, income, and consumption that could be achieved in isolation. " The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), started in January of 1994, created a situation in North America in which there are no taxes on most products imported and exported between the three countries. Ideally, the governments of Canada, the U.S. and Mexico believed that breaking the trading barriers would increase jobs and other things as it improved each of their economies. NAFTA, however, has not necessarily helped the economies in the way in which the governments had projected. There was much speculation before the signing of the treaty that NAFTA would not work out the way it was projected to.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the free trade argument states that if each nation produces what it does best and permits trade, over the long run all will enjoy lower prices and higher levels of output, income, and consumption.
- Explains that the north american free trade agreement (nafta) created a situation in north america where there are no taxes on most products imported and exported between the three countries.
- Analyzes how nafta has slammed the middle class back into poverty in canada and the united states.
- Opines that nafta creates a "trinational superpower" and attracts foreign investors.
- Opines that nafta affects the environment, as it reduces maquiladoras along the u.s.-mexico border.
1075 wordsRead More