By protecting those kids who were younger from the age of 18 juveniles always used the system as a game and said, “ I ain’t sixteen yet,” they cant do anything to me. If the government then protects them and the juveniles get no punishment, that means that the government is giving them a second chance repeating crimes. In the 1950’s juvenile delinquents who were caught doing something illegal were not treated like an adult, because that delinquent was “not criminally responsible... by reason of infancy.” A hearing though would be held but in private to protect the child’s identity. But in the 1960’s the juvenile court system changed and it gave juveniles who were called “respondents” instead criminals, the rights to have a lawyer represent them. On top of that Milad2 it also gives protection like the criminal court system gives adults who are responsible to serious penalties if guilty.
Juveniles still have the possibility of rehabilitating their lifestyle. Not every juvenile will change, but if one can be saved then the purpose of the system has been successful. The punitive approach has attracted a more rebellious attitude in juveniles, making them repeat offenders. The self-fulfilling prophecies of the Label Theory can help justify why some youth chose to engage in delinquent acts in multiple times. Those offenders are just fulfilling that prophecy that is embedded into their mind early in their childhood by their surroundings.
The children may lose respect and affection for their parents to resist their influences or the power of their suggestion.”(Bridges). Bridges book explains that children who are raised in an environment where they have delinquent parents are more likely to become a delinquent child. She also mentions that children that have delinquent parents grow up being rebellious to their parents commands which a sign of future delinquency. As a result, children who are raised in corrupted environments is a major risk factor for youth crime.
More and more children are committing delinquent crimes and we have to figure out what is the root to all of these crimes. Bad parenting does have a relationship with juvenile delinquency. Juvenile delinquency is the committing of criminal acts by a young person, especially one below the age 18. Kids under the age of 18 need guidance and good parents in their life because we are so young and have a lack of experience in certain situations. Nowadays parents influence their children to do things that would be considered bad and could land the child in jail, which isn’t good at all because the most important person in the child’s life is helping them make bad choices that could cost them their lives.
When children can be sent to jail for something as minor as a smash and grab burglary, the judicial system has errors. The laws that send juveniles to adult prisons are inhumane, immoral, and unjust. Kids are often incompetent, which leads to unfair trials. Adult prisons are also very dangerous for minors, and in many cases this leads to more juvenile crimes. People support sending juveniles to adult prisons for many reasons.
For example, bad behavior, drug abuse, rape, murder, etc., but teenagers should learn from their parents mistakes. Teenagers should not be charged differently, if they are in juvenile hall or jail because at the end they still committed a crime. Many people blame the parents when their child’s commit a crime. “Moral are inherent from birth” (Wilde 1). Teenagers should learn from mistakes that they might see around, wether it comes from family members or others.
Another reason why I think juvenile offenders should not be tried as adults is because many of these juveniles come from an unfit home that can lead them to call out for attention by committing a crime and see if anyone would care. For example, my friend was very young when she started to display bad behaviors to call out for her parents ... ... middle of paper ... ...hange their lives forever. I think juvenile offenders should not be sentence nor tried as adults. Let’s also consider the lack of maturity in these juvenile offenders and let’s ponder that their mental capacity is still developing. Nevertheless, let’s not forget how an unfit, abusive, and peer pressure can influences them to commit a crime without thinking.
As you can see, the Seal 2 juvenile justice system is an extremely toxic one, because kids can take advantage of their situation and easily manipulate the outcome in their favor. Some youths are even known to commit crimes without much thought, due to the fact that know they can not be tried as an adult. Another major issue regarding this topic, is that trying kids as adults is hazardous to their well-being and that they should be placed in rehabilitation centers rather than jail. According to the “Coalition for Juvenile Justice”, “young people were deemed to be capable of being rehabilitated and changed.” With that being said, it is a wide misconception that therapy and counseling is the solution to all our problems. Some are under the impression that if we forced children to discuss their behavior with professionals than they are perfectly fit to be welcomed back into society.
To What Degree Does Society View Pedophilia As A Crime? Throughout the world, the protection of children is the main priority. When it comes to the United States, pedophiles are recognized as a threat to the wellbeing of kids of ages of 13 and under. Pedophilia is a mental disorder that can be treated; however, there is no cure for it. This means that pedophiles could be aided in a manner that protects both the pedophile and the youth.
Violence has been a contributing negative factor to society throughout history. Many researchers believe that the use of violent media, particularly video games, play a huge role in the downward trend of behavior and attitude of youth, and that this behavior continues to spiral out of control. However, other researchers believe that since violence has been occurring since the beginning of time, that adolescence are as capable today of violence, as they were a thousand years ago. Research has been found to link violent maladaptive behavior to the use of video games, but other researchers believe that the outcome is inconsistent to the findings, since the results are often skewed. Meta-analysis have statistically proven that violent video games have a negative effect on the behavioral outcome of youth, but due to the combining of meta-analysis, results tend to be distorted and the findings communicate a more vigorous outcome.