For instance, an alleged criminal suspected of a crime has been convicted and this reinforces the views that the system can protect and serve the community. Society admires the idea of convicting people rather than letting them into the society again and risking the danger that can happen. In many cases, officers and prosecutors will use their power to arrest and indict the person that best fits the description of the suspect of the crime. Therefore, the alleged criminal will most likely be convicted based on the description and circumstances of the individual. However, this plainly shows that the system fails to aid the innocent who were merely in the wrong place at the wrong
This argument by Kant shows that offenders will get what they deserve when they commit a wrongful act, but some criminals or murderers don’t really know what is going on, thus they are not deserving of punishment. Kant believes in universalizing the maxims which you act on, hence a murderer has willed that the same thing be done to him which makes the death penalty morally required according to Kant(Kant, pg 240). This shows that Kant is a strong supporter of the death penalty because without it how would we be able to rightfully punish murderers. Therefore all murderers ought to be sentenced to death row and if they are not proven inno... ... middle of paper ... ...idivist murders, in which murderers are given the opportunity to kill innocent people while they are sentenced. Therefore, no matter how you look at it the retributivists have two risks while Bedau only has one.
The adult justice system focuses on punishment, which does not emphasize sending convicts down the right path once, or if, they are released. Juveniles commit sixteen percent of violent crimes that lead to an arrest. Even though sixteen percent is a small number, these crimes still need to be punished using a proper system. In Maryland, judges can waive the juvenile court jurisdiction for any crime that occurs if the juvenile is over fifteen. The judge can waive juvenile court jurisdiction for any capital crime as long the juvenile is seven or older.
They have just as much responsibility and knowledge of their actions just as adults do, so they deserve the same punishment if they commit the same crime. Believe it or not, teens commit the same level of crimes that adults commit. Crimes will get even worse in the future if nothing is strictly done about the unnecessary violent actions. An idea to prevent the crimes from continuing is to punish juveniles and adults equally. Juvenile punishments do not provide the harsh consequences juveniles deserve.
Adult classification enables the judicial system to punish offenders to the fullest extent of the law. Juveniles should be held responsible for their actions because they have values and morals and are able to realize consequences just as well as adults. The tougher punishments given by adult courts discourage other young people from committing crimes and help to keep society safer fro everyone. Justice is served for criminal and victim when the punishment allowed by adult courts compensates for the crime committed. When juveniles are tried as adults in the criminal justice program, society as a whole benefits.
Methods such as the Reid technique, are not helping to reach a true confession from the actual culprit but are instead putting innocent people through so much stress and tension that many start to convince themselves that they may have actually committed the crime they are accused of. These people are essentially confessing because they feel trapped and human nature tells us to try to find an escape. Current interrogation methods are hurting the innocent instead of helping
Instead of the harsh punishment this murderer deserves, a lighter sentence is giving because of one issue, age. After the startling news, that your loved one will not being getting the justice they deserve, the pain and heartbreak will only intensify and multiply. Many aspects that are taken into consideration when finding a verdict and sentencing an individual are for the most part important, but when it comes to a crime it should be judged fairly. A juvenile has the same amount of responsibility as an adult and vice versa. There are all sorts of things that set juveni... ... middle of paper ... ...ly a difference in age, if the crime is the same?
If these teenagers are committing... ... middle of paper ... ...re as runaways or thieves. These crimes are not anywhere near as violent and harmful to society. It may actually damage the mild criminals to have contact with youths who have committed violent crimes. In conclusion, public opinion on the issue is reasonably conclusive. A majority percent of the population believes that imprisonment is the way to prevent future crimes in both adults and juveniles.
5) While that sounds great in theory, the problem arises when the public is unaware of these laws. If the punishment for breaking a law in unknown, than the fear for breaking the law is nowhere to be found. According to Dr. Mulhausen, mandatory minimum drug sentences are necessary for combatting indeterminate sentences done by judges. With these indeterminate sentences, Dr. Mulhausen feared that judges were giving criminals a second chance at life at the expense of the safety of the ppublic. By doing this, criminals who should have been spending time in jail, were let free and often went on to victimize others instead of using their second chance for good.
If capital punishment were carried out more it would prove to be the crime preventative it was partly intended to be. Most criminals would think twice before committing murder if they knew their own lives were at stake. Use of the death penalty as intended by law could actually reduce the number of violent murders by eliminating some of the repeat offenders. The death penalty has always been and continues to be a very controversial issue. In the future, many problems could be resolved keeping the death penalty and not getting rid of it.