The Pros And Cons Of Hydrocarbon Recovery

1956 Words4 Pages

Hydrocarbon recovery forms the crux of the oil and gas energy. Ever since petroleum was established as a source of energy, the oil and industry has always persevered to improve and optimize conventional recovery techniques in an effort to boost production and profits. Nevertheless, the increased over- dependency on hydrocarbons has exhausted reserved from the most commercially viable wells/plays, which is to say that wells requiring standard exploration and production techniques are now on a decline. However, oil and gas deposits are very much available in many regions as shown in Figure 1.1. Most of them exist as unconventional resources usually treated as possible reserves.

Figure 1 - Distribution of oil reserves
When dealing with unconventional resources, conventional recovery methods become obsolete. In fact, the costs of recovering unconventional resources are significantly higher than conventional resources due to presence of additional, more sophisticated processes such as hydraulic fracturing and steam assisted gravity drainage. An example of an unconventional resource would be shale rock, which contains shale oil and shale gas. Unlike regular sedimentary rocks, shale rock requires a combination of hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling in order to be commercially viable for further marketing purposes. Unsurprisingly, unconventional hydrocarbon recovery poses much more of a challenge than regular techniques and should therefore be considered a resource play rather than an exploration play.
This paper serves to examine the prospect of using a single perforation cluster as opposed to multiple perforation clusters within a single stage. Institutively speaking, the usage of multiple clusters is thought to result in a h...

... middle of paper ...

...f pathways to promote hydrocarbons flow, by increasing the number of perforation clusters within a single stage of a play, we risk reducing the initial gas rate and overall gas recovery due to a decrease in the width(s) growth of the center and sub center surfaces of the fractures. Based on the analysis of the Marcellus Shale, an optimal number of clusters would be approximately between 1-6. However, given that each formation is unique, it is important to analyze other parameters in order to determine the best/optimal number of clusters for a specific region.
2) However, the problem above can potentially be adjusted by introducing a fair cluster spacing mechanism. Based on the analysis of all four cases, a higher degree of spacing results in a greater recovery factor potentially due to a decrease in the mechanical interaction between rocks (pore systems).

More about The Pros And Cons Of Hydrocarbon Recovery

Open Document