More handpicked essays just for you.
University Education Should be Free
Advantages and disadvantages of free education
Pros and cons of free college
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: University Education Should be Free
In recent news between political candidates such as Bernie Sanders, free university education has been a controversial topic. Primary and secondary education is offered for free all around the world. Education is seen as necessary. With higher education there is disagreement when it comes. Students must pay tuition to attend universities ,and they may take out student loans or grants. The state offers financial assistance to students and their families. In some countries higher education is a free because everyone has a right to attend. There are many pros and cons to free university education, but the cons outweigh the pros. Therefore, higher education should not be free. The cost to the state is far too great to maintain free higher education. The cost of paying for free higher education is very high. “In the OECD 1.9% of GDP, a third of education expenditure is spent on tertiary education” (OECD 225). For countries to survive, they have to rethink what they can afford to provide to citizens. It seems fair that all states should offer access to primary and secondary opportunities to their citizens. College is not essential to life in the same way. People can be functional and responsible citizens without it. For this reason, the state must consider college in the same way it does any The pros outweigh the cons. The cost to the state is far too great to maintain free higher education. Keeping up with a system of free higher education leads to an uneven distribution of resources. Free higher education benefits one subset of society at the expense of everyone. The state control of acceptance and curriculum criteria has negative effects. There are other ways to make higher education affordable instead of making it free. The financial aid offered to students could increase but higher education should not be
First and foremost, Trade Schools, Colleges and Universities states, “After all, more and more of today's jobs are knowledge-based or require advanced technical skills. So a better-educated workforce would help fill many of the skills gaps that prevent America's economy from growing faster.” If more people attended college then there would be more jobs to fill in America’s economy. There have been droughts in America’s economy, but with free college tuition, droughts would decrease. It would not be fair that someone who could be successful at the job would not be granted the ability to get the job because they don’t have a piece of paper with a signature on it compared to someone who does average or mediocre at the job and had the opportunity to go to college. Making college free also comes with consequences. So graduation numbers might drop, or the people who do graduate might not be as well prepared for the workforce. Also, with more people choosing to attend public colleges because of their tuition-free status, many schools might have to create wait lists or expand the ones they already have. State budgets could become strained, which might lead to cuts and decreased access to the programs that students want to take. Here is the weakness, although it benefits many students, the nation's existing
college can be until they actually experience it. Some will succeed while others don 't have the time and patience for it; as a result, those will be forced to drop out. Stuart M. Butler, states that Less than 20% of students who attend a Community college will graduate within 3 Years, and 15% of those students will continue and get a bachelor’s degree within 6 years (Butler). This evidence suggests that students who attend at a community college and get a degree is very low, and is even lower to those students who will continue to get a higher education after 2 years of community college. So why should the government be paying for a student’s education, if less than half of students will graduate. Is that not a waste of the government’s money? Free college will not help students because students will not take advantage of it. But instead would rather abuse the program. This will affect the students in the future because students will not be getting a degree. This will lead to students having a harder time getting a high paying job to support themselves in the
Why should we be allowed to have the opportunity to have free higher education or decrease the cost of it? Going to college should be our right and cost of tuition should not affect our decision on whether to go or not. The ability to have free higher education with little or no cost can open the door and create many great different paths for us. The more education we have, the more opportunities grow, but that can’t happen to all of us due to tuition costs or even being in debt with loans for not being able to have the money to being with. With tuition being eliminated or decreased, people would attend college more not saying a lot would, but just the fact that more people would consider college. Germany abolished tuition which provides a model for the United
Along with less funding for the lower levels of education, comes a weaker education. So college might be free, but if you can’t even get into college (due to standardized test scores, GPA, etc.), then what is the point of having tuition-less college? As you can see, there are more drawbacks than benefits to free college tuition once you look past the surface of it. Like I said before, at a glance, it seems perfect, flawless. However, take a deeper look and see all of the things that would need to change in order to sustain nationwide tuition-free higher education.
Ultimately, the United States should bring forth a free, government subsidized, higher education, because of its benefit to the economy, creation of equal opportunity, and the resolution of the student loan crisis. Even though it will require funding, there are certainly innocuous alternatives that could provide this rather than putting the extra stress on average American taxpayers.
It is important, especially in a very diverse country like the United States for people to be able to communicate and understand each other. Tressie Mcmillan’s “Why College is Necessary” states, “College is the domain of the relatively privileged, and will likely stay that way for the foreseeable future, even if tuition is eliminated” (115). It can be perceived that by having both wealthy and people who are not as wealthy going to college together, could help people understand compassion and therefore the wealthy could better comprehend the issues that people not as fortunate as they, face. Even though education is seen as only for those that can afford it, if it were made free there would be more diversity. Tressie Mcmillan’s comment is significant because it states something that a lot of people can understand no matter what side they are on when it comes to free college. With higher education comes the knowledge about what really happened in history, this can help people better understand where others come from when they feel differently. In the Michael Moore film, when students had their free tuition threatened, they came together with others from different cultures to help fight what they believed in. Having something as small as free tuition could also inspire students in the United States to come together instead of
The article is written by Matt Bruenig who is a writer primarily focused on economic and political issues that especially affect poverty and inequality system. This essay discusses the idea of free college in the U.S. Topics include the different definitions of “ free college” and various benefits for different class-based students which lead to the inequality of free college plan. The meaning of “free college” varies from one to another. Some believe that it is sponsoring tuition to zero, while others believe that it means not only sponsoring tuition to zero but also living grants. Since there are many different views toward the definition of free college, government may need to declare it clearly. The author also mentions about the lack of equality of free college plan is another problem. Many researches show that the free colleges plan benefits middle-class and higher-class students more than poor students. This is a current and
Nothing in life is free, including college. Many people feel that by offering tuition-free schooling we are not only creating another financial strain for our nation but we are also taking away the motivation students need to obtain a higher degree. Neither of these things are true. Bernie Sanders believes that it is a "national disgrace that hundreds of thousands of Americans don't go to school not because they aren't qualified but because they cannot afford it”, and Mr. Sanders is right. Tuition free schooling would be beneficial to thousands of students; it would be an absolute game changer—especially in the Yakima Valley. Our students would be given the opportunity to learn more than they ever thought possible due to free schooling (given
The first reason college should be free because of how it affects the economy. When people attend college about 60% of young adults earn more when they get their bachelor's degree. Because college graduates are more educated, they can make a requisition for higher paying jobs. In fact, jobs that require a college degree will provide more than the average salary. The free college will also help economic growth. For instance, America's economy depends on people buying products, so college graduates (who have a higher income salary) will get more commodities which will help America grow
A college education is necessary today in society. Students can focus on their academics and try to get a high score. The cost of education for each student has become more difficult to afford. Thus, many students and teachers wonder if free college tuition must be granted. Free education must be responsible and funded by the U.S. government because it will help students focus on their studies, and encourage them to work harder in school. Even thought many people think that education must be free, it is very important for many reasons such as the economy, quality of education, and value of a college degree.
Clearly, the merits of having free higher education outweigh the drawbacks in immeasurable ways, benefiting the individual learners, states, and the nation at large. Having education in higher education free to all would ensure that every citizen get an equal opportunity in life regardless of their social status, it would allow people to concentrate on nation-building rather than loan payment after school, it would make the nation skill-sufficient and all citizens be more productive. Most importantly, education is a basic right that everyone deserves and money should not be a hindrance, thus, education should be free for all.
Free higher education has been seen successfully in places such as Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway and Germany to name a few. Most see this as a positive example to show if they can do it, than why can’t we. Germany is seemingly proof that free higher education can be accomplished easily by means of protest and by participation in politics (Wiener). This is definitely not the case here in America. The reason why that education system would work is because these countries are all vastly different from the U.S. According to the article “Free College in Europe isn’t Really Free,” the U.S. has an enrollment rate of 94% while Germany and other European countries are at about 62% enrollment (Jackson). With a much smaller country than us, they also have a significantly smaller amount of people attending college. Our country is simply much too large and populated to be able to achieve that. These countries also pay much more in taxes than we do. Therefore, free higher education is an unrealistic expectation for such a vast country as
Yes, I strongly believe that college education should be free for everyone because Education is a basic necessity of our society these days. Free education wouldn’t just benefit one generation or one society but it can benefit the whole nation. If a nation is educated, then it can benefit the whole country and it can get better job opportunities for its citizens because in today’s world we can see highly paid jobs are knowledge based or require advanced technical skills. So in my opinion more educated nation would help remove all those flaws which are keeping country’s economy from growing rapidly. If the education is free in college then it can help a lot of those students who got good grades in their high schools but could not get into the college because of their financial situation. This way these kind of needy students who deserves to get a good degree and basically these students are future of America but they could not get it through
Independent.Leadership.Equality. All of these are three characteristics as to what free university education can provide to citizens.Higher education should be free of charge for the citizens of the United States.In the US the average cost for colleges per year is $8,893. Many middle class and under class people cannot afford such costs. It is true that the government will give you grants but most of the time students never get funding from them (Emmons 3). Most people of today can hardly afford a car let alone the fees and tuition of college. Also, it could provide equality to all people. Allowing everyone an equal opportunity to go to college and make something of themselves. It provides a way for poorer families to break free from their social strata that they have been put into (“This House Believes University Education Should Be Free” 4). This is why it is important to make university education free.In the end citizens of the US would benefit from university free education.
Free education allows everyone to study but with low intensity or levels of education. For example, governments with low incomes would not have enough money to employ professional teachers or provide students with all the technological equipment necessary in their studies; it is too expensive. In addition, with free education, the number of students will be impressive. It is important to emphasize that education is not the only responsibility that governments have. They also economically support other public institutions. According to OECD (2008), the major challenge for countries is to secure sufficient funding levels to enable tertiary education institutions to meet the growing expectations of society and respond to the growing demand by students. However, education without cost allows people the same rights and opportunities necessary to the development of an educated society with moral and ethical