The Pros And Cons Of Good Cinema

What is good cinema? It has taken me all semester in order to fully respond to this question adequately. With this final assignment given, I am able to properly depict what in my view is seen as good cinema. The films that are under scrutiny this week are personally viewed as what could be the two most possibly, textbook perfect films that could be deemed as good cinema within this entire semester. “White” and “Synecdoche” could easily be seen to the general public as something of not good cinema because of the little to non-action, or the ability of this film to be considered as less powerful impact on its viewers seen by Universal Studios or any other company of its kind. These two movies are similar in the sense they both portray their films plots, character symmetry, and context of the films all come together to prove the framework is reckoned as good cinema. The deciding factor as to what can be seen as good cinema is well represented when one’s ability to be questioned throughout the film and to accurately respond to those questions afterwards with no hesitant is where the answer lies. Both movies show a droopy demeanor towards that is almost constantly leaving you on the edge of our seats. As the audience progresses the knowledge of these films, depending on the individual you either love or hate the way the movie can change its context drastically.

Since assignment 5 offered our insights of whether or not the two of out of three trilogy films were deemed as good cinema, it is only natural that the third and final film to complete the trilogy falls in that direction as well. “Taken as a whole- which is the only way the three, closely intertwined episodes should be taken- the trilogy charts a movement from a deep sense of...

... middle of paper ...

...d films of the trilogy, we were able to follow and interpret the main themes of the entire trilogy. I thoroughly enjoyed the way this film was laid out. The names of the film as colors are not meant to be a coincidence; it’s strictly there for a reason. “White” signifies equality, Karol want’s to seek revenge on his divorced wife. “White is finally the color of marriage, which haunts Karol in his flashbacks to his wedding day, and which gracefully recurs at the end of the film” (King and Kehr). I’m sure if I were to watch the trilogy in the order of what was expected for it’s audience, then I would think the same way in that this film/trilogy would be deemed as good cinema. Personally films don’t need specific scenes that make you ball you eyes out in order for it be regarded as good cinema, rather the only thing needed is the fact that it questions it’s audience.