The Pros And Cons Of Competency-Based Higher Education

1352 Words3 Pages

Competency-Based Education: Past, Present and Future

The debates over competency-based higher education (CBE) has been going on for at least 5 years with a significant media coverage since President Obama and Arne Duncan pushed for outcome-based assessment of higher education, more transparency of student learning, flexibility and lower costs. However, before looking into the current situation of CBE in the American higher education, pros, cons and the challenges of its adaptation, let us look in the past to have a better understanding of what CBE is.
Kate Ford (2014), Director of Information and Research Analysis at the Center for Innovation in Learning and Student Success, identifies several phases in the development of CBE in the U.S. with …show more content…

She refers to the “practice of giving credit for prior learning ... to help war veterans [WWI] earn high school equivalency through competency-based exams” (Miller, 2015). I would argue, that CBE model was first developed in 1900s when “American society had undergone significant shifting of resources and expectations towards defining the high school diploma as the “benchmark of education literacy” (Hunter and Harmon, 1979 as cited in Kasworm, 1980) (Kasworm, 1980). Kasworm writes that Competency-Based Adult Education (CBAE) programs started at that time allowed adults to take short courses, master missing skills to be considered literate (basic English reading and writing and math) and based on that to receive a High School Diploma. (That initiative was not dropped over time, moreover, it was adopted nation-wide and currently The National External Diploma Program, the derivative of the first CBAE program, “allows adults to demonstrate …show more content…

First, not all students will benefit from this type of learning. Second, Johann N. Neem (2013) argues that CBE “makes sense for those vocational fields ... where the primary goal is certification.” She continues with the statement that the purpose of education is “not to train but to change people, and this takes seat time” (Neem, 2013). Another concern is the quality of education voiced by faculty members and missing element of classroom participation and debate (Kamenetz, 2013), which has proven to foster learning.
Besides the concerns, there are many challenges for implementing CBE across all colleges and universities that lie in the basis of the American higher education system. The first one is the Carnegie Unit that is time-based and that is a basis for awarding financial aid to students (Silva et al, 2015). The second one is the complexity of re-designing curriculum into interrelated competencies and the problem of identifying these competencies in the current diverse educational landscape (Silva et al,

Open Document