Retributivism says that punishment is necessary to achieve justice (Steffen 9).Capital punishment permanently removes the worst criminals from society and should prove much safer for the rest of us than long term or permanent incarceration. It is self evident that dead criminals cannot commit any further crimes, either within prison or after escaping or being released from it (“Arguments”). The death penalty also serves as a better financial solution versus someone serving a life long sentence. Money is not an inexhaustible commodity and the government may very well, better spend our money on the old, the young and the sick, etc. rather than on the long term imprisonments of murders and rapist(“Arguments”).
Is it better to execute them or incarcerate them? This paper will discuss the pros and cons of the death penalty and my personal view regarding this matter. On one hand, proponents of the death penalty believe that it will deter crime. One of the authors in the book that we have been using in class, Louis Pojman, argues that the fear of the death penalty can cause criminals and soon-to-be criminals from committing any sort of heinous crime. Today, the legal teams representing criminals on death row usually try to stall the execution as long as they can.
Congress or a legislature has the right to prescribe the death penalty, but they can’t inflict unnecessary pain . When congress prescribes it, it is known as Capital Punishment because it deals with capital crimes. The Supreme Court believes that the punishment does not violate the eighth amendment because the amendment shapes the procedure for how it is done. To decide a death sentence, the jury must be guided with circumstances of the criminal, then the court must conduct an individual sentencing process. The amendment requires the court to look at a few factors when seeing if it violates.
Capital Punishment loosely based assumption Capital punishment, also referred to as the death penalty, is the judicially ordered execution of a prisoner as a punishment for a serious crime, such as murder. Currently, in the United States, capital punishment is legal; however, it continues to create controversial disputes throughout the country. The first dispute revolves around the misconception that capital punishment attempts to teach society not to kill by killing. The second argument is whether society has an obligation to enforce capital punishment; thirdly, whether the death penalty is a means of vengeance or a means of justice; lastly, one of the most controversial discussions, is whether capital punishment is considered a form of cruel and unusual punishment. Although the death penalty has its faults, I believe it to be an appropriate form of punishment suited for the heinous crime committed.
I agree with this statement because once a person is convicted of a harsh enough crime to be condemned to life in prison they should not be dependent on society’s hard earned cash. Not only does capital punishment clear up room in our already overcrowded prisons, but... ... middle of paper ... ...ty believe that the death penalty serves as the ultimate justice and that it will, in the end, deter murderers and promote the sacredness of human life. Abolitionists view it as harsh, unfair, and contradictory. They see hypocrisy in punishing murder by engaging in murder. Arguments for the death penalty are matched by those that support its abolition; the fight to abolish capital punishment seems to be far from over and only time will tell the story.
Although criminal justice is supposed to protect the citizens in the surrounding areas, sometimes it can be a dangerous way for miscommunication to occur and things to be done or said wrongfully. The death penalty is an example of this incidence. To those that support the death penalty, capital punishment is in lines with the U.S. Constitution while simultaneously providing equity and justice to all; the death penalty is also more cost efficient than alternative sentencing. Whereas those that oppose the death penalty regard it as a form of unjust, ineffective, and immoral punishment. More than seventy percent of voters support the death penalty and according to followers of capital punishment, capital punishment upholds our society ((Sharp , 1997).
With the increase in vicious crimes today, the government must act just as harsh with our justice system to try and prevent these types of crimes. Non-supporters argue that the death penalty is inhumane and should be considered murder. People of this malicious caliber must be dealt with in the same way, an eye for an eye. Putting these criminals to death doesn’t solve the crime that they committed, but it helps the victim’s family and friends to feel a sense of justification for what’s happened to them. The Death Penalty is nothing new to our society.
The benefits of having the death penalty in place is that some crimes are worthy of death, it is cheaper to kill someone then to house them in jail, depending on your faith people are for it, and it is determint to keep people from committing crimes. Some of the crimes that people commit are so horrendous that you should be put to death for what they have done. It would be a privilege for them to still be alive. Depending on the state it costs more to house prisoners than the death penalty. Depending on your faith people are for the death penalty because they go by the verse of Matthew 5:38 “You have heard that it was said,”An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth”.
I think this situation closely resembles how capital punishment deters future crimes. When your life is on the line people tend to hold back these vicious urges. In the article Center for Individual Freedom (CFIF). "The Death Penalty Deters Murder." The Ethics of Capital Punishment, "When discussing moral justification for capital punishment, one of the main issues is whether the death penalty actually deters criminals from committing murder.
It is a form of punishment that is a deterrent for other criminals. Also, capital punishment is a way to prevent the criminal being put to death from committing any further crimes. In most cases, the death penalty is only used whenever a crime is so evil that the individual must be dealt with by an equally strong method. Crimes that usually have the possibility of the death penalty are various across the United States and can include treason and murder (Death Penalty Information Center). There are a few states that give extra stipulations on capital punishment, but for this essay, the focus shall just be on those two crimes.