The Pros And Cons Of Arson

1890 Words4 Pages

Arson has been occurring for many years and about 500,000 fires are set intentionally each year. Arson is defined as any willful or malicious burning or attempt to burn, the property of another or cause physical harm to another. Fire data has been collected since 1977 by the National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) and the amount of fires has been declining ever since. In the past few decades, there has come about a number of serial arsonists- an offender who sets three or more fires with a cooling-off period between the fires (Douglas, et al, 1992). There are numerous serial arsonists who have been caught, some of which include, Peter Dinsdale, Robert Lee Oyler, Thomas Sweatt, and Paul Keller. While the number of fires across the country have …show more content…

He was born with epilepsy, partial paralysis, and a deformed arm, while also living in different children’s homes as he grew up, which showed that he had an unstable home life. He was single and worked as a laborer in Britain. He was not well-educated and as a juvenile he was labeled a pyromaniac because he believed the tingling in his fingers meant it was time to light a fire. He had no known mental illnesses that led him to start the fires, he set three fires purposely knowing there were people in the house because he held a grudge against them (Blanco). Dinsdale’s profile shows that as a young boy he had a fascination with fire and it only worsened as he grew older and began using arson as a weapon. Dinsdale has many of the factors that would consider him to be a serial arsonist, which include, less educated with more trade skills, an unstable home life, set the fires at places he was comfortable around, had a physical disability, and admitted to the arsons when he was …show more content…

Investigators offered a $500,000 reward with any information on who started the fire, while they were already investigating Oyler for some smaller fires earlier in the year. They found cigarettes, which ignited the fires at the scenes, and found his DNA on them. The police arrested Oyler for those fires and then charged him for the Esperanza fire without any DNA evidence. The ignitors for the Esperanza fire were identical to the ones at the other fires which are what convicted Oyler to this fire (Bill). If the police had not found DNA evidence at the scene and connected it to DNA evidence they found at smaller fires earlier that year, Oyler could have killed many more people and damaged much more property. Oyler’s motive is unknown, but what is known is that he had a fascination with fire since he set so many. Oyler was convicted of five counts of first-degree murder, twenty counts of arson, and seventeen counts of arson using an incendiary device. He was sentenced to death on June 5th, 2009, for starting the Esperanza wildfire

Open Document